This is an unedited manuscript accepted for publication and provided as an Article in Press for early access at the author’s request. The article will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and galley proof review before final publication. Please be aware that errors may be identified during production that could affect the content. All legal disclaimers of the journal apply.
Kakali Das,
Amrita Mitra,
Sagardeep Ghosh,
Suchismita Maiti,
Soumyabrata Saha,
Pushpita Roy,
Anubrata Mondal,
Pijush Dutta,
- Assistant Professor, Department of Computer Science & Engineering, Greater Kolkata College of Engineering and Management, West Bengal, India
- Assistant Professor, Department of Computer Science & Engineering, Greater Kolkata College of Engineering and Management, West Bengal, India
- Assistant Professor, Department of Computer Science & Engineering, Greater Kolkata College of Engineering and Management, West Bengal, India
- Associate Professor, Department of Information Technology, Narula Institute of Technology, West Bengal, India
- Associate Professor, Department of Information Technology, JIS College of Engineering, West Bengal, India
- Assistant Professor, Department of Information Technology, Narula Institute of Technology, West Bengal, India
- Assistant Professor, Department of Electrical Engineering, Greater Kolkata College of Engineering and Management, West Bengal, India
- Assistant Professor, Department of Electrical Engineering, Greater Kolkata College of Engineering and Management, West Bengal, India
Abstract
The accurate forecasting of polymer viscosity at various physicochemical conditions has been quite critical due to the nonlinear interactions and interrelations between the variables. This paper suggests a better hybrid modelling framework, which involves the use of Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) and more advanced versions of Quantum Particle Swarm Optimization (QPSO) to better predict polymer viscosity. The input parameters taken are, namely, log (shear rate), polymer concentration, NaCl concentration, Ca 2+ concentration, and temperature, and the output response is log(viscosity). The proposed framework systematically compares classical Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), QPSO, Differential QPSO (DQPSO), and Gaussian QPSO (GQPSO) to optimize ANN weights and bias parameters. Of these, GQPSO uses a mechanism of Gaussian mutation to enhance population diversity, preventing premature convergence. Mean squared error (MSE), root mean square error (RMSE), relative error, and fitness value are used to assess the performance of each model on testing and cross-validation data. The findings show that predictive accuracy is definitely improved with the change of the optimization strategy towards GQPSO. The ANN-GQPSO model has the lowest values of RMSE and the greatest values of fitness, indicating better convergence and strength. Further analysis of the comparative study reveals that the Gaussian mutation improves the global search ability, which allows the model to break out of local minima and more accurately represent intricate nonlinear correlations in the data set. Besides the performance indicators, the study provides evidence of the significance of optimization schemes in modeling polymer systems with the help of neural networks. The model proposed, ANN-GQPSO, is a fixed and computationally valuable system to forecast the viscosity of polymers that does not have to make use of high-scale tests.
Keywords: Quantum Particle Swarm Optimization (QPSO), Gaussian Mutation, Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Polymer Rheology, Hybrid Optimization Framework

Kakali Das, Amrita Mitra, Sagardeep Ghosh, Suchismita Maiti, Soumyabrata Saha, Pushpita Roy, Anubrata Mondal, Pijush Dutta. Study of an Improved Quantum Particle Swarm Optimization-Based Framework for Neural Network Optimization in Modelling of Polymer Data. Journal of Polymer & Composites. 2026; 14(04):-.
Kakali Das, Amrita Mitra, Sagardeep Ghosh, Suchismita Maiti, Soumyabrata Saha, Pushpita Roy, Anubrata Mondal, Pijush Dutta. Study of an Improved Quantum Particle Swarm Optimization-Based Framework for Neural Network Optimization in Modelling of Polymer Data. Journal of Polymer & Composites. 2026; 14(04):-. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/jopc/article=2026/view=248867
References
1. Bird RB, Armstrong RC, Hassager O. Dynamics of polymeric liquids. Vol. 1: Fluid mechanics. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley; 1987.
2. Mezger TG. The rheology handbook. 3rd ed. Hannover: Vincentz Network; 2014.
3. Malkin AY, Isayev AI. Rheology: Concepts, methods, and applications. 3rd ed. Toronto: ChemTec Publishing; 2017.
4. Lake LW. Enhanced oil recovery. Englewood Cliffs (NJ): Prentice Hall; 1989.
5. Sharma P, Singh A. Modeling of viscosity of polymer solutions using machine learning approaches. J Appl Polym Sci. 2019;136(24):47685. doi:10.1002/app.47685.
6. Haykin S. Neural networks and learning machines. 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River (NJ): Prentice Hall; 2009.
7. Bishop CM. Pattern recognition and machine learning. New York: Springer; 2006.
8. Hornik K, Stinchcombe M, White H. Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators. Neural Netw. 1989;2(5):359-366.
9. Kennedy J, Eberhart R. Particle swarm optimization. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks (ICNN); 1995. p. 1942-1948.
10. Clerc M, Kennedy J. The particle swarm—Explosion, stability, and convergence in a multidimensional complex space. IEEE Trans Evol Comput. 2002;6(1):58-73.
11. Sun J, Feng B, Xu W. Particle swarm optimization with quantum behavior. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC); 2004. p. 325-331.
12. Fang W, Sun J, Ding Y, Wu X, Xu W. A review of quantum-behaved particle swarm optimization. IETE Tech Rev. 2010;27(4):336-348.
13. Mondal S, Mukherjee S, Chakraborty S. Gaussian quantum particle swarm optimization for engineering optimization problems. Appl Soft Comput. 2024;145:110567.
14. Chen X, Liu Y, Zhang H. Machine learning-based prediction of material properties: A review. Mater Today Commun. 2022;31:103564. doi:10.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.103564.
15. Demir H. Application of artificial neural networks for modeling engineering systems. Eng Appl Artif Intell. 2020;92:103654. doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2020.103654.
16. Zhang Y, Wang S, Ji G. Deep learning for material property prediction: A review. Comput Mater Sci. 2021;188:110197. doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2020.110197.
17. Mirjalili S, Mirjalili SM, Lewis A. Particle swarm optimization: Theory, literature review, and applications. Swarm Evol Comput. 2021;61:100824. doi:10.1016/j.swevo.2020.100824.
18. Li X, Zhang Y, Wang S. Improved particle swarm optimization for high-dimensional optimization problems. Swarm Evol Comput. 2022;68:101012. doi:10.1016/j.swevo.2021.101012.
19. Sun J, Li H, Xu W. Revisiting quantum-behaved particle swarm optimization: Recent advances and applications. Inf Sci. 2021;565:161-183. doi:10.1016/j.ins.2021.02.046.
20. Fang W, Sun J, Ding Y, Wu X, Xu W. Advances in quantum-behaved particle swarm optimization: Theory and applications. Appl Soft Comput. 2022;120:108676. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2022.108676.
21. Li Y, Chen M, Zhou Q. Differential quantum particle swarm optimization for global optimization. Appl Math Comput. 2023;438:127563. doi:10.1016/j.amc.2022.127563.
22. Wang Z, Kawamoto K, Hirota K, Yan F. Multi-strategy quantum particle swarm optimization for efficient path planning of mobile robots. J Supercomput. 2025;81(15):1460. doi:10.1007/s11227-025-07901-8
23. Sharma P, Singh A. Machine learning approaches for predicting the viscosity of polymer solutions. J Appl Polym Sci. 2021;138(15):50231. doi:10.1002/app.50231.
24. Dutta P, Kumar A. Modeling and optimization of a liquid flow process using an artificial neural network-based flower pollination algorithm. J Intell Syst. 2019;29(1):787-798.
25. Dutta P, Kumar A. Design an intelligent calibration technique using optimized GA-ANN for a liquid flow control system. J Eur Syst Autom. 2017;50(4-6):449.
26. Verma AK. Polymer dataset [Internet]. Kaggle; Available from: https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/akverma9/polymer-dataset
27. Dutta P, Cengiz K, Kumar A. Study of bio-inspired neural networks for the prediction of liquid flow in a process control system. In: Cognitive Big Data Intelligence with a Metaheuristic Approach. Academic Press; 2022. p. 173-191.
28. Chattaraj S, Islam ST, Dutta P, Das M. Study of improved quantum particle swarm optimization for modeling of wasted surgical masks. Sigma. 2026;44(1):115-126.
29. Yu S. Differential evolution quantum particle swarm optimization for solving job-shop scheduling problem. In: Proceedings of the Chinese Control and Decision Conference (CCDC); 2019. p. 559-564.
30. Sahoo A, Singh P. Advancements in quantum-PSO and its application in sustainable development. In: Applications of Artificial Intelligence, Big Data and Internet of Things in Sustainable Development. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 2022. p. 309-347.
31. Zhou NR, Xia SH, Ma Y, Zhang Y. Quantum particle swarm optimization algorithm with the truncated mean stabilization strategy. Quantum Inf Process. 2022;21(2):42.
32. Jana B, Mazumdar BD, Ghatak A, Mishra M. Mutation-based quantum particle swarm optimisation: A novel approach to global optimisation. In: Quantum Computing. Boca Raton (FL): Auerbach Publications; 2025. p. 201-220.
33. Chaubey C, Khare R. Enhancing quality of services using genetic quantum behaved particle swarm optimization for location dependent services. Sādhanā. 2024;49(2):179.
34. Gan S, Hu H, Li S, Peng Q, Yan T, Gong H, Zhang Y. Optimization of power output in plateau photovoltaic power stations using a hybrid Kepler and Gaussian quantum particle swarm algorithm. Discover Artificial Intelligence. 2025;5(1):161.

Journal of Polymer & Composites
| Volume | 14 |
| 04 | |
| Received | 17/04/2026 |
| Accepted | 10/06/2026 |
| Published | 03/07/2026 |
| Publication Time | 77 Days |
Login
PlumX Metrics