Eco-Efficient Skies: Life Cycle Assessment and Carbon Footprint Minimization of Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Composites in Aerospace Application

Year : 2026 | Volume : 14 | Special Issue 03 | Page : 147 160
By

Krupal Pawar,

Eknath Bayas,

Shekhar Rahane,

Rajeshkumar Sambhe,

Balaprasad Kurpatwar,

  1. Assistant Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Rajiv Gandhi College of Engineering, SPPU, Karjule Harya, Dist. Ahilyanagar, Maharashtra, India
  2. Assistant Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Amrutvahini College of Engineering, SPPU, Sangamner, Dist. Ahilyanagar, Maharashtra, India
  3. Assistant Professor, Department of Basic Sciences, Nutan Maharashtra Institute of Engineering & Technology, SPPU, Pune, Maharashtra, India
  4. Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Jawaharlal Darda Institute of Engineering & Technology, SGBAU, Yavatmal, Maharashtra, India
  5. Associate Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Adsul’s Technical Campus, SPPU, Chas, Dist. Ahilyanagar, Maharashtra, India

Abstract

The increasing integration of fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) composites in aerospace structures necessitates a rigorous evaluation of their environmental sustainability throughout their entire life cycle. This study presents a comprehensive life cycle assessment (LCA) and carbon footprint analysis of carbon fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP) and glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) composites applied to structural and semi-structural components in commercial aerospace applications. Following ISO 14040/14044 standards and employing the ReCiPe 2016 Midpoint (H) impact assessment methodology, a cradle-to-grave boundary was established encompassing raw material extraction, fiber and matrix production, composite manufacturing, in-service operational phase, and end-of-life treatment. Functional unit was defined as 1 kg of composite structural component delivering equivalent mechanical performance to aluminum alloy AA2024-T3. Results indicate that CFRP manufacturing generates 26.4 kg CO₂ eq./kg compared to 22.8 kg CO₂ eq./kg for GFRP; however, the operational carbon savings attributable to weight reduction approximately 30–50% over aluminum result in a net lifecycle benefit of 189–340 kg CO₂ eq. per kilogram saved over a 25-year aircraft service life. End-of-life recycling via pyrolysis reduced embodied carbon by 12–15%, while combined circular economy strategies achieved up to 59–73% reduction. Bio-based thermoplastic matrices and recycled carbon fiber (rCF) substitution are identified as high-impact decarbonization levers. This study establishes a quantitative sustainability roadmap for aerospace composite material selection, offering decision-support metrics for eco-efficient aircraft design aligned with ICAO Carbon Offsetting and Reduction Scheme for International Aviation (CORSIA) targets.

Keywords: Life cycle assessment; Carbon footprint; Fiber-reinforced polymer composites; Aerospace sustainability; CFRP recycling; Eco-efficient design; Circular economy; CORSIA.

[This article belongs to Special Issue under section in Journal of Polymer & Composites (jopc)]

How to cite this article: Krupal Pawar, Eknath Bayas, Shekhar Rahane, Rajeshkumar Sambhe, Balaprasad Kurpatwar. Eco-Efficient Skies: Life Cycle Assessment and Carbon Footprint Minimization of Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Composites in Aerospace Application. Journal of Polymer & Composites. 2026; 14(03):147-160.
How to cite this URL: Krupal Pawar, Eknath Bayas, Shekhar Rahane, Rajeshkumar Sambhe, Balaprasad Kurpatwar. Eco-Efficient Skies: Life Cycle Assessment and Carbon Footprint Minimization of Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Composites in Aerospace Application. Journal of Polymer & Composites. 2026; 14(03):147-160. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/jopc/article=2026/view=245976

References

  1. International Civil Aviation Organization. Annual report of the council 2023: Aviation and climate (ICAO Doc 10164). ICAO; 2023. ICAO Annual Report 2023
  2. International Civil Aviation Organization. CORSIA phase II implementation standards and recommended practices. ICAO; 2023. ICAO CORSIA
  3. Borges CE, Chícharo A, Araújo A, Silva J, Santos RM. Designing of carbon fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP) composites for a second-life in the aeronautic industry. Front Mater. 2023;10:1179270. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmats.2023.1179270
  4. Shelly D, Singhal V, Jaidka S, et al. Mechanical performance of bio-based fiber reinforced polymer composites: A review. Polym Compos. 2025;46(S3):S9–S43. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.30000
  5. Sakamoto K, Kawajiri K, Hatori H, Tahara K. Impact of the manufacturing processes of aromatic-polymer-based carbon fiber on life cycle greenhouse gas emissions. Sustainability. 2022;14(6):3541. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14063541
  6. Kolb M, Bey A, Herrmann F. Recyclability of composites in commercial aviation: Industrial specificities, readiness and challenges. J Compos Sci. 2025;9(9):471. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs9090471
  7. Skosana SJ, Khoathane C, Malwela T. Driving towards sustainability: A review of natural fiber reinforced polymer composites for eco-friendly automotive light-weighting. J Reinf Plast Compos. 2024;43(11):982–999. https://doi.org/10.1177/08927057241254324
  8. IndustryARC Research. Aerospace thermoplastic composites market – Forecast (2025–2031). IndustryARC; 2024. IndustryARC Report
  9. Butenegro JA, Bahrami M, Swolfs Y, et al. Novel sustainable composites incorporating a biobased thermoplastic matrix and recycled aerospace prepreg waste. Polymers. 2023;15(16):3447. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15163447
  10. Wu M, Sadhukhan J, Murphy R, Bharadwaj U, Cui X. A novel life cycle assessment and life cycle costing framework for carbon fibre-reinforced composite materials in the aviation industry. Int J Life Cycle Assess. 2023;28(5):566–589. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-023-02164-y
  11. Ramachandran K, Gnanasagaran CL, Vekariya A. Life cycle assessment of carbon fiber and bio-fiber composites prepared via vacuum bagging technique. J Manuf Process. 2023;89:124–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2023.01.024
  12. Kozlowski A, Tronchetti M, Bergmann A. Development of life cycle inventories for hybrid-electric aircraft configurations spanning 2030–2050. Environ Sci Technol. 2022;56(2):1267–1277. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c05556
  13. Vega-Leal C, Zárate-Pérez C, Gomez-Culebro VA, et al. Mechanical recycling of carbon fibre reinforced polymers. Part 1: Influence of cutting speed on recycled particles and composites properties. Int J Sustain Eng. 2024;17(1):159–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/
    2024.2324359
  14. Yuan M, Li Z, Teng Z. Progress and prospects of recycling technology for carbon fiber reinforced polymer. Front Mater. 2024;11:1484544. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmats.2024.1484544
  15. Medina-Mira R, Acosta-Villaverde JL, Fuentes CA. Development of a sustainable chemical recycling process of carbon fibers from epoxy-based composites. Compos Part B Eng. 2025;298:112520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2025.112520
  16. Puttegowda M. Eco-friendly composites: Exploring the potential of natural fiber reinforcement. Discov Appl Sci. 2025;7(5):401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-025-06981-8
  17. Deng B, Zhang X, Li Y. Beyond durability: The transformative journey of carbon fiber reinforced epoxy composites through advanced interfacial engineering, self-healing, and vitrimer-enabled recycling. Adv Compos Hybrid Mater. 2025;8:241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42114-025-01544-2
  18. Elizondo R. How lightweighting and advanced materials can power aviation to net zero. Aerosp Glob News. 2025 Dec. Aerospace Global News Article
  19. Ayrilmis N, Kanat G, Yildiz Avsar E, Palanisamy S, Ashori A. Utilizing waste manhole covers and fiberboard as reinforcing fillers for thermoplastic composites. J Reinf Plast Compos. 2024;44(17–18):1108–1118. https://doi.org/10.1177/07316844241238507
  20. Manickaraj K, Palanisamy S, Santulli C, Ayrilmis N, Siengchin S. Value-added utilization of agricultural wastes in biocomposite production: Characteristics and applications. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.15368
  21. Ramasubbu R, Kayambu A, Palanisamy S, Ayrilmis N. Mechanical properties of epoxy composites reinforced with Areca catechu fibers containing silicon carbide. BioResources. 2024;19(2):2353–2370. https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.19.2.2353-2370
  22. Palanisamy S, Santulli C, Ayrilmis N, Ramasubbu R, Rajini N. Tensile properties and fracture morphology of Acacia caesia bark fibers treated with different alkali concentrations. J Nat Fibers. 2022;19(15):11258–11269. https://doi.org/10.1080/15440478.2021.2022562
  23. Mylsamy B, Aruchamy K, Shanmugam SMK, Palanisamy S, Ayrilmis N. Improving performance of composites: Natural and synthetic fibre hybridisation techniques in composite materials – A review. Mater Chem Phys. 2025;334:130439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2025.130439
  24. Manickaraj K, Karthik A, Palanisamy S, Jayamani M, Ali SK, Sankar SL, Al-Farraj SA. Improving mechanical performance of hybrid polymer composites: Incorporating banana stem leaf and jute fibers with tamarind shell powder. BioResources. 2025;20(1):1998–2025. https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.20.1.1998-2025
Special Issue Subscription Original Research
Volume 14
Special Issue 03
Received 25/05/2026
Accepted 02/06/2026
Published 10/06/2026
Publication Time 16 Days

Login

My IP

PlumX Metrics