Rethinking Stocking Density in Broilers: Assessments of Physiological, Behavioral, and Environmental Impacts

Year : 2026 | Volume : 16 | 02 | Page :
    By

    Md. Emran Hossain,

  1. Professor, Department of Animal Science and Nutrition, Chattogram Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Khulshi, Chattogram, b

Abstract

High stocking density in broiler production is a common practice aimed at maximizing space utilization and economic returns. However, it poses significant challenges to the performance, health, and welfare of the birds. This study explores the multifaceted impacts of elevated stocking density on broiler chickens, highlighting the physiological, behavioral, and environmental factors that deteriorate their overall well-being. Increased stocking density is associated with reduced growth rates, poor feed conversion efficiency, compromised immune function, and heightened susceptibility to respiratory diseases. Additionally, overcrowding impairs welfare through limited mobility, increased incidence of leg disorders, feather pecking, and stress-related behaviors, while also exacerbating litter quality and ammonia buildup, further contributing to health risks. The study examines how these adverse effects cumulatively result in higher mortality rates and reduced productivity, underscoring the need for optimal stocking density management to ensure sustainable broiler production. The findings emphasize the importance of balancing economic considerations with animal welfare and health to promote both ethical and productive poultry farming practices.

Keywords: Broiler, health, performance, productivity, stocking density, welfare

How to cite this article:
Md. Emran Hossain. Rethinking Stocking Density in Broilers: Assessments of Physiological, Behavioral, and Environmental Impacts. Research and Reviews : A Journal of Life Sciences. 2026; 16(02):-.
How to cite this URL:
Md. Emran Hossain. Rethinking Stocking Density in Broilers: Assessments of Physiological, Behavioral, and Environmental Impacts. Research and Reviews : A Journal of Life Sciences. 2026; 16(02):-. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/rrjols/article=2026/view=244056


References

  1. E. L. T. Chung, N. A. A. Bakar, N. A. A. Fauzi, F. F. A. Jesse, and T. C. Loh, “How Stocking Density Affects Broiler Chicken Production? A Comprehensive Review,” Poult. Sci. J., 2026, Accessed: Mar. 27, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&profile=ehost&scope=site&authtype=crawler&jrnl=23456604&AN=191554848&h=YLM03iPVL2GUSWdlLCiFFXrKWIUZCXNQg3%2FhFCKsTTE6MlwpduY08CtGOaHVVX1OYy0Ndt1h%2BDEy40je5Ll%2BVA%3D%3D&crl=c
  2. D. Bai et al., “Comprehensive analysis of the effects of high stocking density stress on broiler health,” frontiersin.org, vol. 12, Jan. 2026, doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1741407.
  3. M. N.-P. S. and Management and  undefined 2025, “Improving bone health in broiler chickens: integrating population density, housing, and nutritional strategies for enhanced welfare and productivity,” Springer, vol. 2, no. 1, Dec. 2025, doi: 10.1186/s44364-025-00017-y.
  4. S. Zhou et al., “Evaluating broiler welfare and behavior as affected by growth rate and stocking density,” Poult. Sci., vol. 103, no. 4, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2024.103459.
  5. B. Tainika, A. Şekeroğlu, A. Akyol, and Z. Waithaka Ng’ang’a, “Effect of stocking density on broilers behaviour and welfare indices,” journals.ekb.eg, vol. 79, no. 2, pp. 285–329, 2023, doi: 10.1080/00439339.2023.2175343.
  6. T. Shynkaruk, K. Long, C. LeBlanc, and K. Schwean-Lardner, “Impact of stocking density on the welfare and productivity of broiler chickens reared to 34 d of age,” J. Appl. Poult. Res., vol. 32, no. 2, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.japr.2023.100344.
  7. S. S. Nielsen et al., “Welfare of broilers on farm,” Wiley Online Libr., vol. 21, no. 2, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.7788.
  8. J. A. J. van der Eijk, H. Gunnink, S. Melis, J. W. van Riel, and I. C. de Jong, “Reducing stocking density benefits behaviour of fast- and slower-growing broilers,” Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., vol. 257, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2022.105754.
  9. K. K. Thema, C. M. Mnisi, and V. Mlambo, “Dietary strategies to alleviate high-stocking-density-induced stress in broiler chickens–a comprehensive review,” aab.copernicus.org, vol. 17, no. 10 October, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275811.
  10. J. Son, H. J. Kim, E. C. Hong, and H. K. Kang, “Effects of Stocking Density on Growth Performance, Antioxidant Status, and Meat Quality of Finisher Broiler Chickens under High Temperature,” Antioxidants, vol. 11, no. 5, 2022, doi: 10.3390/antiox11050871.
  11. M. I. El Sabry, S. S. A. Hassan, M. M. Zaki, and F. K. R. Stino, “Stocking density: a clue for improving social behavior, welfare, health indices along with productivity performances of quail (Coturnix coturnix)—a review,” Springer, vol. 54, no. 1, p. 83, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.1007/s11250-022-03083-0.
  12.  M. Zabir et al., “Impacts of stocking density rates on welfare, growth, and hemato-biochemical profile in broiler chickens,” J. Adv. Vet. Anim. Res., vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 642–649, 2021, doi: 10.5455/javar.2021.h556.
  13. S. Jhetam, “The impact of stocking density on the performance, health and welfare of turkey hens,” 2021, Accessed: Mar. 27, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://harvest.usask.ca/bitstream/10388/13514/1/JHETAM-THESIS-2021.pdf
  14. T. Van Limbergen et al., “Risk factors for poor health and performance in European broiler production systems,” Springer, vol. 16, no. 1, Aug. 2020, doi: 10.1186/s12917-020-02484-3.
  15.  I. C. De Jong and D. Guémené, “Major welfare issues in broiler breeders,” Worlds. Poult. Sci. J., vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 73–82, 2011, doi: 10.1017/S0043933911000067.
  16.  S. Meseret, “A review of poultry welfare in conventional production system,” Livest. Res. Rural Dev., vol. 28, no. 12, 2016, Accessed: Mar. 27, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Selam-Meseret/publication/311321712_A_review_of_poultry_welfare_in_conventional_production_system/links/58419bc908ae8e63e6218f2e/A-review-of-poultry-welfare-in-conventional-production-system.pdf
  17. S. Karaarslan and A. Nazlıgül, “Effects of lighting, stocking density, and access to perches on leg health variables as welfare indicators in broiler chickens,” Livest. Sci., vol. 218, pp. 31–36, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2018.10.008.
  18.  D. G. Thomas et al., “Influence of stocking density on the performance, carcass characteristics and selected welfare indicators of broiler chickens,” Taylor Fr., vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 76–81, 2004, doi: 10.1080/00480169.2004.36408.
  19. J. A. McLean, C. J. Savory, and N. H. C. Sparks, “Welfare of male and female broiler chickens in relation to stocking density, as indicated by performance, health and behaviour,” Anim. Welf., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 55–73, 2002, doi: 10.1017/s0962728600024313.
  20. A. M. Abudabos, E. M. Samara, E. O. S. Hussein, M. Q. Al-Ghadi, and R. M. Al-Atiyat, “Impacts of stocking density on the performance and welfare of broiler chickens,” Taylor Fr., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 66–71, 2013, doi: 10.4081/ijas.2013.e11.
  21.  I. Estevez, “Density allowances for broilers: Where to set the limits?,” Poult. Sci., vol. 86, no. 6, pp. 1265–1272, 2007, doi: 10.1093/ps/86.6.1265.
  22. P. E. Simitzis et al., “Impact of stocking density on broiler growth performance, meat characteristics, behavioural components and indicators of physiological and oxidative stress,” Taylor Fr., vol. 53, no. 6, pp. 721–730, Dec. 2012, doi: 10.1080/00071668.2012.745930.
  23. W. Bessei, “Welfare of broilers: A review,” Worlds. Poult. Sci. J., vol. 62, no. 3, 2006, doi: 10.1079/WPS2005108.
  24.  M. A. Erasmus, “A review of the effects of stocking density on Turkey behavior, welfare, and productivity,” Poult. Sci., vol. 96, no. 8, pp. 2540–2545, 2017, doi: 10.3382/ps/pex075.
  25.   V. Ravindran, D. V. Thomas, D. G. Thomas, and P. C. H. Morel, “Performance and welfare of broilers as affected by stocking density and zinc bacitracin supplementation,” Wiley Online Libr., vol. 77, no. 1, pp. 110–116, Feb. 2006, doi: 10.1111/j.1740-0929.2006.00327.x.
  26. C. L. Bailie, C. Ijichi, and N. E. O’Connell, “Effects of stocking density and string provision on welfare-related measures in commercial broiler chickens in windowed houses,” Poult. Sci., vol. 97, no. 5, pp. 1503–1510, 2018, doi: 10.3382/ps/pey026.
  27. M. Houshmand, K. Azhar, I. Zulkifli, M. H. Bejo, and A. Kamyab, “Effects of prebiotic, protein level, and stocking density on performance, immunity, and stress indicators of broilers,” Poult. Sci., vol. 91, no. 2, pp. 393–401, 2012, doi: 10.3382/ps.2010-01050.
  28. Z. Skrbic, Z. Pavlovski, M. Lukic, V. Petricevic, M. Djukic-Stojcic, and D. Zikic, “The effect of stocking density on individual broiler welfare parameters: 2. Different broiler stocking densities,” Biotechnol. Anim. Husb., vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 17–24, 2011, doi: 10.2298/bah1101017s.
  29. X. M. Li et al., “Effects of stocking density on growth performance, growth regulatory factors, and endocrine hormones in broilers under appropriate environments,” Poult. Sci., vol. 98, no. 12, pp. 6611–6617, 2019, doi: 10.3382/ps/pez505.
  30. D. Goo, J. H. Kim, G. H. Park, J. B. Delos Reyes, and D. Y. Kil, “Effect of stocking density and dietary tryptophan on growth performance and intestinal barrier function in broiler chickens,” Poult. Sci., vol. 98, no. 10, pp. 4504–4508, 2019, doi: 10.3382/ps/pez215.
  31. C. J. Nicol et al., “Effects of stocking density, flock size and management on the welfare of laying hens in single-tier aviaries,” Taylor Fr., vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 135–146, Apr. 2006, doi: 10.1080/00071660600610609.
  32. A. Martrenchar, D. Huonnic, J. P. Cotte, E. Boilletot, and J. P. Morisse, “Influence of stocking density on behavioural, health and productivity traits of turkeys in large flocks,” Taylor Fr., vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 323–331, 1999, doi: 10.1080/00071669987403.
  33. A. L. Hall, “The effect of stocking density on the welfare and behaviour of broiler chickens reared commercially,” Anim. Welf., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 23–40, 2001, doi: 10.1017/s096272860002323x.
  34. P. Najafi et al., “Environmental temperature and stocking density effects on acute phase proteins, heat shock protein 70, circulating corticosterone and performance in broiler chickens,” Springer, vol. 59, no. 11, pp. 1577–1583, Nov. 2015, doi: 10.1007/s00484-015-0964-3.
  35. V. Tsiouris, I. Georgopoulou, C. Batzios, N. Pappaioannou, R. Ducatelle, and P. Fortomaris, “High stocking density as a predisposing factor for necrotic enteritis in broiler chicks,” Taylor Fr., vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 59–66, Mar. 2015, doi: 10.1080/03079457.2014.1000820.
  36. S. Buijs, L. Keeling, S. Rettenbacher, E. van Poucke, and F. A. M. Tuyttens, “Stocking density effects on broiler welfare: Identifying sensitive ranges for different indicators,” Poult. Sci., vol. 88, no. 8, pp. 1536–1543, 2009, doi: 10.3382/ps.2009-00007.
  37. A. Meluzzi, F. S.-I. J. of A. Science, and  undefined 2009, “Welfare of broiler chickens,” Taylor Fr., vol. 8, no. SUPPL. 1, pp. 161–173, 2009, doi: 10.4081/ijas.2009.s1.161.
  38. A. L. Hall, “The effect of stocking density on the welfare and behaviour of broiler chickens reared commercially,” Anim. Welf., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 23–40, 2001, doi: 10.1017/s096272860002323x.
Ahead of Print Subscription Review Article
Volume 16
02
Received 02/04/2026
Accepted 14/05/2026
Published 14/05/2026
Publication Time 42 Days
29

Login


My IP

PlumX Metrics