Comparative Assessment of Polymers and composites for Solar Panels: Fundamentals, Performance Metrics, Manufacturing, and Sustainability

Notice

This is an unedited manuscript accepted for publication and provided as an Article in Press for early access at the author’s request. The article will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and galley proof review before final publication. Please be aware that errors may be identified during production that could affect the content. All legal disclaimers of the journal apply.

Year : 2026 | Volume : 14 | 03 | Page :
    By

    Shashi Gandhar,

  • S B Kumar,

  • Diksha Chopade,

  • Kusum Tharani,

  • Prakhar Priyadarshi,

  • Abhishek Gandhar,

  1. Associate Professor, Department of Electrical & Electronics Engineering, Bharati Vidyapeeth’s College of Engineering, New Delhi, India
  2. Associate Professor, Department of Electronics & Communication Engineering, Bharati Vidyapeeth’s College of Engineering, New Delhi, India
  3. Research Scholar, Department of Electrical Engineering, Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University) College of Engineering, Pune, Maharashtra, India
  4. Professor, Department of Electrical & Electronics Engineering, Bharati Vidyapeeth’s College of Engineering, New Delhi, India
  5. Professor, Department of Information Technology, Bharati Vidyapeeth’s College of Engineering, New Delhi, India
  6. Professor, Department of Electrical & Electronics Engineering, Bharati Vidyapeeth’s College of Engineering, New Delhi, India

Abstract

This paper presents a comprehensive review of the main types of Photo Voltaic polymers and composites such as crystalline silicon (both mono- and poly-Si), thin-film tech (CdTe, CIGS, a-Si), perovskites, and organic/dye-sensitized cells and analyses the parameters  such as efficiency, fill factor, open-circuit voltage, temperature response, and degradation. The analysis focusses on polymers and composites and manufacturing techniques like vapor deposition, roll-to-roll printing, and both solution and vapor techniques for perovskites. This paper deals with performance analysis and a comparative assessment of different architectures, lead-free perovskites, greener absorber polymers and composites, and more nonconventional types. Silicon is still leading material because of proven technology, economical perspective but perovskite–silicon type modules and new thin-film technologies are advanced technologies with higher efficiency. This paper gives a detailed review of recent technologically advanced polymers and composites for manufacturing the solar panels. The presented comprehensive assessment of these polymers and composites can be a helpful framework for researchers and academicians working on solar photovoltaic polymers and composites and and their mythologies. The review also highlights emerging research trends, environmental considerations, and long‑term stability challenges, offering insights into future directions for material innovation and scalable fabrication. These added perspectives support broader understanding of the sustainable energy development achieved by the next‑generation PV materials.

Keywords: Crystalline silicon; thin-film; perovskite; OPV; DSSC; life cycle assessment; tandem cells; recycling.

How to cite this article:
Shashi Gandhar, S B Kumar, Diksha Chopade, Kusum Tharani, Prakhar Priyadarshi, Abhishek Gandhar. Comparative Assessment of Polymers and composites for Solar Panels: Fundamentals, Performance Metrics, Manufacturing, and Sustainability. Journal of Polymer & Composites. 2026; 14(03):-.
How to cite this URL:
Shashi Gandhar, S B Kumar, Diksha Chopade, Kusum Tharani, Prakhar Priyadarshi, Abhishek Gandhar. Comparative Assessment of Polymers and composites for Solar Panels: Fundamentals, Performance Metrics, Manufacturing, and Sustainability. Journal of Polymer & Composites. 2026; 14(03):-. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/jopc/article=2026/view=243761


References

[1] W. Shockley and H. J. Queisser, “Detailed balance limit of efficiency of p–n junction solar cells,” J. Appl. Phys., vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 510–519, 1961.

[2] B. Roedern, K. Zweibel, and H. S. Ullal, “The role of polycrystalline thin-film PV technologies for achieving midterm market-competitive PV modules,” in Proc. IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conf. (PVSC), 2005, pp. 183–188, doi: 10.1109/PVSC.2005.1488101.

[3] M. A. Green et al., “Solar cell efficiency tables,” Prog. Photovolt.: Res. Appl. (version information not specified).

[4] A. Gandhar, S. Vijay, A. Mohapatra, J. Datta, and S. Shukla, “An informative review on recent development of renewable energy system,” J. Inf. Optim. Sci., vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 419–427, 2022, doi: 10.1080/02522667.2022.2048516.

[5] S. Y. Myong et al., “Superstrate type flexible thin-film Si solar cells using flexible glass substrates,” Thin Solid Films, 2014.

[6] M. A. Green, E. D. Dunlop, M. Yoshita, N. Kopidakis, K. Bothe, G. Siefer, and X. Hao, “Solar cell efficiency tables (Version 63),” Prog. Photovolt.: Res. Appl., vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 3–13, 2023, doi: 10.1002/pip.3750.

[7] A. Mdallal, A. Yasin, M. Mahmoud, M. A. Abdelkareem, A. H. Alami, and A. G. Olabi, “A comprehensive review on solar photovoltaics: Navigating generational shifts, innovations, and sustainability,” Sustainable Horizons, vol. 13, Art. no. 100137, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.horiz.2025.100137.

[8] P. Dale and M. Scarpulla, “Efficiency versus effort: A better way to compare best photovoltaic research cell efficiencies?” Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells, vol. 251, Art. no. 112097, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.solmat.2022.112097.

[9] T. Hasarmani, R. Holmukhe, A. Gandhar, and S. Bhardwaj, “Optimum sizing and performance assessment of solar PV–DG hybrid system for energy self sufficiency of jaggery making units,” in Proc. IEEE Bangalore Humanitarian Technology Conf. (B-HTC), Oct. 8–10, 2020.

[10] H. Ali and H. A. Khan, “Techno-economic evaluation of two 42 kWp polycrystalline-Si and CIS thin-film based PV rooftop systems in Pakistan,” Renew. Energy, vol. 152, pp. 347–357, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2019.12.144.

[11] H. K. R. Rao, E. Gemechu, U. Thakur, K. Shankar, and A. Kumar, “Techno-economic assessment of titanium dioxide nanorod-based perovskite solar cells: From lab-scale to large-scale manufacturing,” Appl. Energy, vol. 298, Art. no. 117251, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117251.

[12] J. Ramanujam, D. M. Bishop, T. K. Todorov, O. Gunawan, J. Rath, R. Nekovei, E. Artegiani, and A. Romeo, “Flexible CIGS, CdTe and a-Si:H based thin film solar cells: A review,” Prog. Mater. Sci., vol. 110, Art. no. 100619, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2019.100619.

[13] P. G. C. N. T. Pilapitiya and A. S. Ratnayake, “The world of plastic waste: A review,” Cleaner Materials, vol. 11, Art. no. 100220, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.clema.2024.100220.

[14] S. J. Kim, “Nanostructured photovoltaic devices for next generation solar cell,” 2008.

[15] W. Zhang, M. Saliba, S. D. Stranks, Y. Sun, X. Shi, U. Wiesner, and H. J. Snaith, “Enhancement of perovskite-based solar cells employing core–shell metal nanoparticles,” Nano Lett., vol. 13, no. 9, pp. 4505–4510, 2013, doi: 10.1021/nl4024287.

[16] C. D. Rodríguez-Gallegos et al., “Global techno-economic performance of bifacial and tracking photovoltaic systems,” Joule, vol. 4, no. 7, pp. 1514–1541, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.joule.2020.05.005.

Ahead of Print Subscription Review Article
Volume 14
03
Received 05/03/2026
Accepted 21/03/2026
Published 13/05/2026
Publication Time 69 Days
2

Login


My IP

PlumX Metrics