H Rahman,
A Akter,
M M Rahman,
M M Islam,
R Momotaz,
T H Tabassum,
M Nazneen,
Salma Sarker,
- Senior Scientific Officer, Horticulture Research Centre (HRC), Regional Agricultural Research Station (RARS), Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute (BARI),, Jamalpur-2000, Bangladesh
- Senior Scientific Officer, Horticulture Research Centre (HRC), Regional Agricultural Research Station (RARS), Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute (BARI),, Jamalpur-2000, Bangladesh
- Principal Scientific Officer, Plant Pathology Division, Regional Agricultural Research Station (RARS), Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute (BARI),, Jamalpur-2000, Bangladesh
- Principal Scientific Officer, Plant Pathology Division, Regional Agricultural Research Station (RARS), Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute (BARI),, Joydebpur, Gazipur-1701, Bangladesh
- Senior Scientific Officer, Plant Pathology Division, Regional Agricultural Research Station (RARS), Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute (BARI),, Joydebpur, Gazipur-1701, Bangladesh
- Scientific Officer, Plant Pathology Division, Regional Agricultural Research Station (RARS), Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute (BARI),, Joydebpur, Gazipur-1701, Bangladesh
- Scientific Officer, Plant Pathology Division, Regional Agricultural Research Station (RARS), Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute (BARI),, Joydebpur, Gazipur-1701, Bangladesh
- Assistant Professor, Department of Plant Pathology, Faculty of Agriculture, Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University, Sher-e-Bangla Nagar, Dhaka-1207, Bangladesh
Abstract
A field experiment was conducted at the field of Plant Pathology Division, Regional Agricultural Research Station (RARS), Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute (BARI), Jamalpur-2000, Bangladesh during February to July 2024 to assessment the efficacy/effectiveness of thirty-five (35) new fungicides received from Pesticide Technical Advisory Committee (PTAC), Bangladesh with control treatment against anthracnose disease of mango. Most of the fungicides under inspection were able to control the disease successfully. This study suggests that fungicidal spray significantly affected the development of anthracnose in mangoes. Most of the fungicides used in this study were successful in preventing anthracnose, but they all decreased the disease’s incidence and severity to varying degrees when compared to the control. Efficacy of different new fungicides ranged from 68.65 to 99.17%. Thirty-five (35) fungicides inhibited the disease by over 90%. However, only five (5) fungicides were able to inhibit the disease by less than 80%. Regarding the effectiveness of several new fungicides, the following efficient fungicidal treatments are recommended in order of higher to lower efficacy: Azoxystrobin 20% + Difenoconazole 12.5% SC > Carbendazim 50% WDG > Trifloxystrobin 25% + Tebuconazole 50% WDG > Tricyclazole 75% WP > Mancozeb 50% + Carbendazim 25% 75 WP. Most of the fungicides that were being studied were successful in controlling the disease. According to the study, fungicides that managed the disease increased fruit yields and, as a result, yielded the highest profits. Azoxystrobin 20% + Difenoconazole 12.5% SC was the most effective spray over control, followed by Carbendazim 50% WDG and Trifloxystrobin 25% + Tebuconazole 50% WDG. The findings demonstrated the benefits of controlling mango anthracnose with fungicides. The best methods to prevent mango anthracnose and guarantee effective mango cultivation, according to the mango producers, are to spray Azoxystrobin 20% + Difenoconazole 12.5% SC, Carbendazim 50% WDG, and Trifloxystrobin 25% + Tebuconazole 50% WDG.
Keywords: Anthracnose disease, colletotrichum gloeosporioides, correlation study, disease incidence, disease severity, efficacy of different new fungicides, mango, yield (kg/plant)
[This article belongs to International Journal of Trends in Horticulture ]
H Rahman, A Akter, M M Rahman, M M Islam, R Momotaz, T H Tabassum, M Nazneen, Salma Sarker. Evaluation of New Fungicides for the Management of Mango Anthracnose Disease Caused by Colletotrichum Gloeosporioides. International Journal of Trends in Horticulture. 2026; 03(01):1-16.
H Rahman, A Akter, M M Rahman, M M Islam, R Momotaz, T H Tabassum, M Nazneen, Salma Sarker. Evaluation of New Fungicides for the Management of Mango Anthracnose Disease Caused by Colletotrichum Gloeosporioides. International Journal of Trends in Horticulture. 2026; 03(01):1-16. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/ijthc/article=2026/view=241442
References
1. Fitzell RD and Peak CM. The epidemiology of anthracnose of mango: inoculum sources, spore production and dispersal. Ann. App. Biol. 1984; 104:53-59.
2. Prusky D. Mango Diseases: An overview. Acta Hort. 1991; 291:279-287.
3. Muirhead IF and Grattidge R. Mango Diseases. In: Proceedings of the CSIRO. 1st Australian Mango Research Workshop. 1984. Cairns, 1986; pp.248-252. CSIRO.
4. Dodd JC, Jeffries P and Jeder MJ. Management strategies to control latent infection in tropical fruit.
Aspects of Applied Biology. 1989; 20:49-56.
5. Singh DB and Chundawat BS. Post-harvest treatments of ripening changes and quality of mango fruits cv. ‘Kesar’ and ‘Amrapali’. Acta. Hort. 1991; 291: 472-478.
6. Quroshi SU and Meah MB. Postharvest loss in mango owing to stem-end rot. Internat. J. of Trop. Agric. 1991; 9(2): 98-105.
7. Splanding DH. Resistance of Mango pathogens to fungicides used to control postharvest diseases.
Plant Disease. 1982; 66:1185-1186.
8. Quimio AJ and Quimio TH. Post-harvest control of Philippine mango anthracnose by benomyl.
Philippine Agriculturist. 1974; 58:147-155.
9. Ahmed HU, Hossain MM, Alam SMK, Haq MI and Hossain M. Efficacy of different fungicides in controlling anthracnose and sooty mould of mango. Bangladesh J. Agril. Res. 1991; 16(1): 74-78.
10. Mortuza MG, Reza MMA, Kader KA and Iqbal SM. Effect of pre-harvest fungicidal spray on post-harvest disease control in mango. Bangladesh J. Agril. Res. 2000; 25(4): 671-676
11. Mortuza MG, Islam MS and Alam SMK. Efficacy of fungicides to control post-harvest anthracnose and stem-end rot of mango. Bangladesh J. Plant Pathol. 2003; 19(1&2): 87-92.
12. Bondad ND, Cabauatan RM, Laude SS, Mercado EL, Operio ECN, Sarabia AS and Tolentino EP. Aspects of mango flowering and fruiting. Department of Horticulture, UPLB, Laguna, Philippines. 1980; 186p.
13. Singh RS. Introduction to Principles of Plant Pathology. Third Edition, Oxford & IBH publishing Co. 66 J. Path., New Delhi 110001. 1984; 328 p.
14. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2025.
15. Sundravadana S, Alice D, Kuttalam S, Samiyappan R. Efficacy of azoxystrobin on Colletotrichum gloeosporioides Penz growth and on controlling mango anthracnose. J Agric Biol Sci. 2007; 2(3):11–15.
16. Venkataravanappa AV, Nagund VB. Sensitivity of mango anthracnose to fungicides. Ann Plant Prot Sci. 2008; 16(1): 203–267.
17. Kumar A. Management of anthracnose disease of mango by pre and post-harvest treatments. Ann Plant Prot Sci. 2014; 22:390–394.

International Journal of Trends in Horticulture
| Volume | 03 |
| Issue | 01 |
| Received | 17/11/2025 |
| Accepted | 23/01/2026 |
| Published | 29/04/2026 |
| Publication Time | 163 Days |
Login
PlumX Metrics