This is an unedited manuscript accepted for publication and provided as an Article in Press for early access at the author’s request. The article will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and galley proof review before final publication. Please be aware that errors may be identified during production that could affect the content. All legal disclaimers of the journal apply.
Kausar Marfani,
- Assistant Professor, Training and Placement Officer Noble University, Bhesan Road, Bamagam, Junagadh., Gujarat, India
Abstract
Considering the precious contribution of AI in the field of literature as a co-author is a fascinating idea, but this idea has white colour galore, so black and grey swans are also tremendous. It can make author’s tidious and time consuming endeavors very simplified that is Green swans but as the same time author’s creativity is inguinity, its cognitive also can be deteriorated that is grey swan before the advent of AI or huminist AI found by Mustufa 2 Suleman of Microsoft writer was poring out his ethics, creativity, imagination, social and humanistics views but, unfortunately after the advent of AI most of the creativity has been clouded and stiffled by AI. So, I have covered the versatality and universality swiftness rapidity, error free nature, accuration, holistic paradigm, such as improving literally qualities, enabling author to be more proliofic more furtile dis advantages that AI will delete all the human ability, viability, creativity, imaginativeness, cognative etc.. also AI can be detrimental to literary creation at the same time positive factor in making literature totally holistic, out of this world and purely pragmatic boosting Author’s inguinity and cognitive. Hence, AI is great as well as gory both it midwives Gulliver and Liliputians both, it sires Alpha literary artist as well as delta, so, how you use, abuse overuse or rough use,indiscrimately use this can be a Demon or Divine so, selecting AI is good but opting for Humanist AI is great, as Humanist AI is absulately Human friendly, not lack luster elements. And this research design is descriptive, based on research methodology with secondary data collection. The outcome of all these endeavours concludes in aiming AI as a tool to yield positive dividends to the society in general and literary, literary people and literary men of letters to derive unprecedented dividends making their creativity and creation totally out of this world.
Keywords: Alpha and Delta, Demon or Devine, Great and Gory, Gray and Green Swans, Humanist AI.
Kausar Marfani. Literature in the Age of Artificial Intelligence “Artificial Intelligence as Co-Author in Holistic Paradigm”. OmniScience: A Multi-disciplinary Journal. 2026; 16(01):-.
Kausar Marfani. Literature in the Age of Artificial Intelligence “Artificial Intelligence as Co-Author in Holistic Paradigm”. OmniScience: A Multi-disciplinary Journal. 2026; 16(01):-. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/osmj/article=2026/view=241218
References
1. Sanjna Gulia (2024), Independent researcher in artificial intelligence and contemporary writing studies, The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Enhancing Creative Writing Practices and Redefining the Modern Authorial Process
2. Silvana Colella (2025), Faculty of literary and cultural studies within European research institutions, Human and Machine Collaboration in Writing: An Analytical Study of Causal Authorship Models
3. Adam Cheng (2025), Research community focused on healthcare simulation and scholarly communication, Applications of Generative AI in Academic Writing: Benefits, Limitations, and Ethical Considerations 14
4. Jia Chaudhari (2025), Artificial intelligence and neural computation research domain, Exploring Creativity and Originality in Text Produced by Neural Network–Based AI Systems
5. Henrickson (2026), Interdisciplinary research in digital humanities and computational literature, Questioning the Concept of Authorship in the Context of Computer- Generated Texts
6. Asha Sharma (2023), Indian higher education and academic writing environments, The Emergence of Generative AI as an Implicit Collaborator in University-Level Academic Writing
7. Anil Kumar Mishra (2023), Indian social science research and publication landscape, Trends in AI-Supported Research Output: A Bibliometric Review of Indian Social Science Scholarship
8. Astha Ojha (2023), Indian legal studies and intellectual property scholarship, Legal and Copyright Implications of Artificial Intelligence–Generated Texts in India
9. Anita Rao (2024), Studies in academic and literary knowledge production, Artificial Intelligence as a Collaborative Agent in Academic and Creative Writing Processes 10. Neha Verma (2024), Ethics, governance, and policy studies in Indian universities, Ethical Challenges and Policy Considerations of Using Generative AI in Higher Education Writing Practice
11. Johnson, D. (2025). The impact of AI on editing and proofreading in academic writing.
12. Martinez, S. (2024). Democratizing writing through artificial intelligence tools.
13. Patel, A. (2025). Homogenization of writing styles in the age of artificial intelligence.
14. Clarke, E. (2023). AI-assisted creativity: A study of human–machine collaboration in writing.
15. Desai, R. (2026). Humanist AI: Aligning artificial intelligence with human values in creative domains.
16. Khan, F. (2025). Artificial intelligence in multilingual writing and global communication.
OmniScience: A Multi-disciplinary Journal
| Volume | 16 |
| 01 | |
| Received | 17/03/2026 |
| Accepted | 28/04/2026 |
| Published | 28/04/2026 |
| Publication Time | 42 Days |
Login
PlumX Metrics