Eco-Design Approaches in Modern Machine Tool Construction

Year : 2025 | Volume : 12 | Issue : 03 | Page : 23 29
    By

    Sneha Varshney,

  1. Student, Department of Mechanical Engineering, United College of Engineering and Research, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India

Abstract

In the contemporary landscape of manufacturing, sustainability is no longer optional; it is imperative. Within this context, machine tool construction presents a unique set of challenges and opportunities: these heavy, energy-intensive pieces of capital equipment operate across long lifecycles, consume substantial embodied energy and materials, and eventually require disposal or remanufacture. This study explores eco-design approaches tailored specifically to modern machine tools, covering the full lifecycle from material sourcing and structure through operational efficiency, modularity, and remanufacturing, to end-of-life. Key strategies include lightweight and hybrid structural materials, modular and reconfigurable design enabling upgrades rather than replacement, energy-efficient drives and controls, digital monitoring for predictive maintenance, and lifecycle assessment (LCA) frameworks to guide choices. The review draws on recent literature in machine tool energy-consumption modelling, remanufacturing of conventional machines into CNC tools, modular “green” machine tool concepts, and eco-mechatronics design philosophy. It highlights how manufacturers of machine tools can integrate sustainability criteria, including resource efficiency, recyclability, energy use, and circular economy principles, into their design, manufacturing, and business models. The study also discusses barriers to adoption (cost, standards, market acceptance) and proposes a roadmap for future research and industrial implementation. Ultimately, the aim is to provide both an academic synthesis and a practical blueprint for how eco-design can help machine tool builders and users deliver improved environmental performance without sacrificing precision, reliability, or competitiveness.

Keywords: Lifecycle assessment, ultra high-performance concrete, life cycle costing, eco-comparison ratio

[This article belongs to Trends in Machine design ]

How to cite this article:
Sneha Varshney. Eco-Design Approaches in Modern Machine Tool Construction. Trends in Machine design. 2025; 12(03):23-29.
How to cite this URL:
Sneha Varshney. Eco-Design Approaches in Modern Machine Tool Construction. Trends in Machine design. 2025; 12(03):23-29. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/tmd/article=2025/view=235066


References

  1. Ahmad S, Wong KY, Ming LT, Wong WP. Sustainable product design and development: A review of tools, applications, and research prospects. Resour Conserv Recycl. 2018; 132: 49–61.
  2. Calleja-Ochoa A, Gonzalez-Barrio H, Polvorosa-Teijeiro R, Lopez-De La Calle Marcaide L. Multitasking machines: Evolution, resources, processes and scheduling. DYNA. 2017; 92(6): 637–642.
  3. Oleaga I, Pardo C, Zulaika JJ, Bustillo A. A machine-learning based solution for chatter prediction in heavy-duty milling machines. Measurement. 2018; 128: 34–44.
  4. Brundage MP, Bernstein WZ, Hoffenson S, Chang Q, Nishi H. Analyzing environmental sustainability methods for use earlier in the product lifecycle. J Clean Prod. 2018; 187: 877–892.
  5. Schweizer ML, Nair R. A practical guide to systematic literature reviews and meta-analyses in infection prevention: Planning, challenges, and execution. Am J Infect Control. 2017; 45(11): 1292–1294.
  6. Yoon HS, Kim ES, Kim MS, Lee JY, Lee GB, Ahn SH. Towards greener machine tools—A review on energy saving strategies and technologies. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2015; 48: 870–891.
  7. Rivero A, López de Lacalle LN, Penalva ML. Tool wear detection in dry high-speed milling based upon the analysis of machine internal signals. Mechatronics. 2008; 18(10): 627–633.
  8. Kamal A, Al-Ghamdi SG, Koc M. Revaluing the costs and benefits of energy efficiency: A systematic review. Energy Res Soc Sci. 2019; 54: 68–84.
  9. Padayachee J, Bright G. Modular machine tools: Design and barriers to industrial implementation. J Manuf Syst. 2012; 31(2): 92–102.
  10. Battaïa O, Dolgui A, Guschinsky N. Decision support for design of reconfigurable rotary machining systems for family part production. Int J Prod Res. 2017; 55(5): 1368–1385.

Regular Issue Subscription Review Article
Volume 12
Issue 03
Received 06/11/2025
Accepted 11/11/2025
Published 24/11/2025
Publication Time 18 Days


Login


My IP

PlumX Metrics