Pranjal Maher,
Amruta Chopde,
Shubham Paradhe,
Shaikh Md Yasin,
Abstract
This study presents the structural design and analysis of a G+4 residential building, with a specific focus on ductile detailing to enhance seismic performance. Ductility plays a crucial role in enabling structures to absorb and dissipate energy during seismic events, thereby minimizing structural damage and improving safety. The project emphasizes key reinforcement strategies such as beam-column junction detailing and confining reinforcement, which are critical to preventing brittle failures and improving overall structural integrity. To ensure a comprehensive evaluation, the project utilizes industry-standard software tools including AutoCAD for architectural planning, ETABS for structural modelling and load analysis, and RCDC for detailed reinforcement and design calculations. The process begins with developing an accurate building layout in AutoCAD, followed by importing the plan into ETABS for three-dimensional modelling. Various loading conditions such as dead loads, live loads, and seismic forces are applied to assess the structural response under realistic scenarios. Special attention is given to the beam-column joint regions, where enhanced reinforcement techniques are employed to effectively transfer loads and improve joint ductility. Through a combination of design optimization and simulation, the study investigates the role of ductile detailing in improving resilience and reducing potential failure points during seismic events. The ultimate objective of this research is to demonstrate how proper ductile design and reinforcement strategies can significantly improve the earthquake resistance of urban buildings. The findings aim to contribute to better structural practices, offering valuable insights for engineers and designers seeking to enhance the safety and sustainability of mid-rise reinforced concrete structures in seismic zones
Keywords: Ductile detailing, seismic performance, ETABS, RCDC, AutoCAD, reinforced concrete, beam-column joint, confining reinforcement, earthquake-resistant design, structural modelling
[This article belongs to Journal of Structural Engineering and Management ]
Pranjal Maher, Amruta Chopde, Shubham Paradhe, Shaikh Md Yasin. Design and Analysis of G+4 Building with Ductile Detailing. Journal of Structural Engineering and Management. 2025; 12(02):1-9.
Pranjal Maher, Amruta Chopde, Shubham Paradhe, Shaikh Md Yasin. Design and Analysis of G+4 Building with Ductile Detailing. Journal of Structural Engineering and Management. 2025; 12(02):1-9. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/josem/article=2025/view=232937
References
- Sardar S, Hama A. Evaluation of p-delta effect in structural seismic response. MATEC Web Conf. 2018; 162: 04019. doi:10.1051/matecconf/201816204019
- Gawande S, Amte U, Agrawal S, Saonerkar A, Dabhekar K, Khedikar I, et al. Seismic analysis of tall structures. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci. 2021; 822: 012028. doi:10.1088/1755-1315/822/1/012028.
- Upadhyay H, et al. Dynamic analysis of G+15 multi-storied RCC commercial buildings with different plan configuration in seismic zone V using ETABS 2018. Int Res J Eng Technol. 2021; 8(8): 308–313.
- Azhar CK. Design and analysis of (G+4) residential building using ETABS. Int J Res Appl Sci Eng Technol. 2022; 10(7): 235–239.
- Chiluka S, Oggu P. Performance assessment of ductile detailing code-based reinforced concrete special moment resisting frames. IJE Trans C. 2023; 36(3): 457–464.
- Shajahan M, et al. Analysis and design of multi-storey building using ETABS. Int J Multidiscip Res. 2024; 6(2): 1–27.
- Yunus M. Seismic response spectrum analysis (zone V) of a G+10 steel framed structure using different grades of steel. Int J Dev Res. 2024; 14(8): 66368–66371.
- Thapa A, Thapa S, Thapa K, Gwachha J. Numerical modeling, analysis and structural design of G+4 RC building with re-entrant corners. Asian J Eng Technol. 2024 Dec;12(1):6–17. doi: https://doi.org/10.24203/wpvg1q26.
- Pourali N, Khosravi H, Dehestani M. An investigation of P-delta effect in conventional seismic design and direct displacement-based design using elasto-plastic SDOF systems. Bull Earthq Eng. 2019; 17: 313–336. doi:10.1007/s10518-018-0460-3.
- Sahu PK, Chaturvedi A. Seismic analysis of tall multistorey structure considering variable column condition using ETABS. Int J Sci Res Civil Eng. 2023; 7(5): 20–26.

Journal of Structural Engineering and Management
| Volume | 12 |
| Issue | 02 |
| Received | 04/04/2025 |
| Accepted | 09/04/2025 |
| Published | 11/04/2025 |
| Publication Time | 7 Days |
Login
PlumX Metrics