Classification and Comparison of Routing Protocols in Wireless Sensor Networks

Year : 2025 | Volume : 03 | Issue : 02 | Page : 35 44
    By

    Shallu Hassija,

  • Sunil Sikka,

  • Meenu Vijarania,

  1. Research Scholar, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Amity University, Gurugram, Haryana, India
  2. Professor, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Amity University, Gurugram, Haryana, India
  3. Associate Professor, School of Engineering and Technology, Kr. Mangalam University, Gurugram, Haryana, India

Abstract

Recent developments and the overlap of multiple technologies, including distributed signal processing, ad-hoc network routing protocols, embedded systems, integrated circuits, micro electro-mechanical systems, microprocessor hardware, and nanotechnology, have rendered the idea of Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) possible. Sensor network nodes are finite with regard to energy, processing capability, and communication bandwidth. Yet, since they can vary with respect to the application and network structure, the routing protocols have received the most emphasis. In order to prolong the lifespan of the sensor nodes, effective routing protocols need to be designed. While monitoring and reporting occurrences is the primary purpose of sensor networks, no single routing protocol can be used for all applications since sensor networks rely on their applications. In this research, we are dealing with the difficulties of sensor network design and proposing classification and comparison of routing protocols. This comparison highlights the significant features that must be considered when designing and comparing new routing protocols for sensor networks.

Keywords: Sensor networks, design issues, routing protocols, applications

[This article belongs to International Journal of Wireless Security and Networks ]

How to cite this article:
Shallu Hassija, Sunil Sikka, Meenu Vijarania. Classification and Comparison of Routing Protocols in Wireless Sensor Networks. International Journal of Wireless Security and Networks. 2025; 03(02):35-44.
How to cite this URL:
Shallu Hassija, Sunil Sikka, Meenu Vijarania. Classification and Comparison of Routing Protocols in Wireless Sensor Networks. International Journal of Wireless Security and Networks. 2025; 03(02):35-44. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/ijwsn/article=2025/view=232830


References

  1. Akyildiz IF, Su W, Sankarasubramaniam Y, Cayirci E. A survey on sensor networks. IEEE Commun Mag. 2002 Aug 31; 40(8): 102–14.
  2. Doumit SS, Agrawal DP. Self-organizing and energy-efficient network of sensors. In IEEE MILCOM 2002. Proceedings. 2002 Oct 7; 2: 1245–1250.
  3. Subramanian L, Katz RH. An architecture for building self-configurable systems. 2000 First Annual Workshop on Mobile and Ad Hoc Networking and Computing. MobiHOC (Cat. No.00EX444), Boston, MA, USA. 2000. pp. 63-73. doi: 10.1109/MOBHOC.2000.869214.
  4. Pan J, Hou YT, Cai L, Shi Y, Shen SX. Topology control for wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 9th annual international conference on Mobile computing and networking. 2003 Sep 14; 286–299.
  5. Callaway E, Gorday P, Hester L, Gutierrez JA, Naeve M, Heile B, Bahl V. Home networking with IEEE 802.15. 4: a developing standard for low-rate wireless personal area networks. IEEE Commun Mag. 2002 Aug 31; 40(8): 70–7.
  6. Shen CC, Srisathapornphat C, Jaikaeo C. Sensor information networking architecture and applications. IEEE Pers Commun. 2001 Aug 31; 8(4): 52–9.
  7. Romer K, Mattern F. The design space of wireless sensor networks. IEEE Wirel Commun. 2004 Dec 20; 11(6): 54–61.
  8. Shi E, Perrig A. Designing secure sensor networks. IEEE Wirel Commun. 2004 Dec 20; 11(6): 38–43.
  9. Akyildiz IF, Su W, Sankarasubramaniam Y, Cayirci E. A survey on sensor networks. IEEE Commun Mag. 2002 Aug 31; 40(8): 102–14.
  10. Gutierrez JA, Naeve M, Callaway E, Bourgeois M, Mitter V, Heile B. IEEE 802.15. 4: a developing standard for low-power low-cost wireless personal area networks. IEEE Netw. 2001 Oct 31; 15(5): 12–9.
  11. Al-Karaki JN, Al-Mashaqbeh GA. Energy-centric routing in wireless sensor networks. Microprocess Microsyst. 2007 Jun 1; 31(4): 252–62.
  12. Heinzelman WB, Murphy AL, Carvalho HS, Perillo MA. Middleware to support sensor network applications. IEEE Netw. 2004 Jun 28; 18(1): 6–14.
  13. Yao Y, Gehrke J. The cougar approach to in-network query processing in sensor networks. ACM Sigmod Rec. 2002 Sep 1; 31(3): 9–18.
  14. Al–Karaki JN, Kamal AE. Routing techniques in wireless sensor networks: a survey. IEEE Wirel Commun. 2004 Dec 20; 11(6): 6–28.
  15. Kulik J, Heinzelman W, Balakrishnan H. Negotiation-based protocols for disseminating information in wireless sensor networks. Wirel Netw. 2002 Mar; 8(2): 169–85.
  16. Tilak S, Abu-Ghazaleh NB, Heinzelman W. A taxonomy of wireless micro-sensor network models. ACM SIGMOBILE Mob Comput Commun Rev. 2002 Apr 1; 6(2): 28–36.
  17. Krishnamachari B, Estrin D, Wicker S. Modelling data-centric routing in wireless sensor networks. In IEEE infocom. 2002 Jun; 2: 39–44.
  18. Heinzelman WR, Kulik J, Balakrishnan H. Adaptive protocols for information dissemination in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 5th annual ACM/IEEE international conference on Mobile computing and networking. 1999 Aug 1; 174–185.
  19. Intanagonwiwat C, Govindan R, Estrin D. Directed diffusion: A scalable and robust communication paradigm for sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 6th annual international conference on Mobile computing and networking. 2000 Aug 1; 56–67.
  20. Braginsky D, Estrin D. Rumor routing algorthim for sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM international workshop on Wireless sensor networks and applications. 2002 Sep 28; 22–31.
  21. Schurgers C, Srivastava MB. Energy efficient routing in wireless sensor networks. In 2001 IEEE MILCOM proceedings communications for network-centric operations: creating the information force (Cat. No. 01CH37277). 2001 Oct 28; 1: 357–361.
  22. Chu M, Haussecker H, Zhao F. Scalable information-driven sensor querying and routing for ad hoc heterogeneous sensor networks. Int J High Perform Comput Appl. 2002 Aug; 16(3): 293–313.
  23. Sadagopan N, Krishnamachari B, Helmy A. The ACQUIRE mechanism for efficient querying in sensor networks. In Proceedings of the First IEEE International Workshop on Sensor Network Protocols and Applications, 2003. 2003 May 11; 149–155.
  24. Heinzelman WR, Chandrakasan A, Balakrishnan H. Energy–efficient communication protocol for wireless microsensor networks. In IEEE Proceedings of the 33rd annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences. 2000 Jan 7; 10p.
  25. Manjeshwar A, Agrawal DP. APTEEN: A hybrid protocol for efficient routing and comprehensive information retrieval in wireless sensor networks. In Parallel and distributed processing symposium, international; IEEE Computer Society. 2002 Apr 1; 3: 0195b–0195b.
  26. Lindsey S, Raghavendra CS. PEGASIS: Power-efficient gathering in sensor information systems. In Proceedings, IEEE aerospace conference. 2002 Mar 9; 3: 3–3.
  27. Xu Y, Heidemann J, Estrin D. Geography-informed energy conservation for ad hoc routing. In Proceedings of the 7th annual international conference on Mobile computing and networking. 2001 Jul 16; 70–84.
  28. Chen B, Jamieson K, Balakrishnan H, Morris R. Span: An energy-efficient coordination algorithm for topology maintenance in ad hoc wireless networks. In Proceedings of the 7th annual international conference on Mobile computing and networking. 2001 Jul 16; 85–96.
  29. Yu Y, Govindan R, Estrin D. Geographical and energy aware routing: a recursive data dissemination protocol for wireless sensor networks. UCLA Comput Sci Dep Tech Rep. 2001 May;UCLA/CSD-TR-01-0023:159-69.
  30. Sohrabi K, Gao J, Ailawadhi V, Pottie GJ. Protocols for self-organization of a wireless sensor network. IEEE Pers Commun. 2000 Oct 31; 7(5): 16–27.
  31. He T, Stankovic JA, Lu C, Abdelzaher T. SPEED: A stateless protocol for real–time communication in sensor networks. In 23rd IEEE International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems, 2003 Proceedings. 2003 May 19; 46–55.
  32. Mainwaring A, Culler D, Polastre J, Szewczyk R, Anderson J. Wireless sensor networks for habitat monitoring. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM international workshop on Wireless sensor networks and applications. 2002 Sep 28; 88–97.
  33. Biagioni E, Bridges K, Chee BJ. PODS: A remote ecological Micro sensor network. EURASIP J Wirel Commun Netw archive. 2005.
  34. Bonnet P, Gehrke J, Seshadri P. Querying the physical world. IEEE Pers Commun. 2002 Aug 6; 7(5): 10–5.
  35. Schwiebert L, Gupta SK, Weinmann J. Research challenges in wireless networks of biomedical sensors. In Proceedings of the 7th annual international conference on Mobile computing and networking. 2001 Jul 16; 151–165.
  36. Baldus H, Klabunde K, Muesch G. Reliable set-up of medical body-sensor networks. In European Workshop on Wireless Sensor Networks. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2004 Jan 19; 353–363.
  37. Römer K. Tracking real–world phenomena with smart dust. In European Workshop on Wireless Sensor Networks. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2004 Jan 19; 28–43.
  38. Kidd CD, Orr R, Abowd GD, Atkeson CG, Essa IA, MacIntyre B, Mynatt E, Starner TE, News tetter W. The aware home: A living laboratory for ubiquitous computing research. In International workshop on cooperative buildings. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 1999 Oct 1; 191–198.
Regular Issue Subscription Original Research
Volume 03
Issue 02
Received 10/07/2025
Accepted 25/08/2025
Published 09/09/2025
Publication Time 61 Days
105

Login


My IP

PlumX Metrics