Adaptive E-Learning Algorithms and Heutagogy: A Systematic Analysis

Year : 2025 | Volume : 16 | Issue : 03 | Page : 33 38
    By

    Rupali A. Vinchurkar,

  • Gajendra R. Bamnote,

  1. Assistant Professor, PG Department of Computer Application, Prof. Ram Meghe Institute of Technology and Research, Badnera, Maharashtra, India
  2. Principal, Professor, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Prof. Ram Meghe Institute of Technology and Research, Badnera, Maharashtra, India

Abstract

The proliferation of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) technologies has transformed the digital education landscape by enabling adaptive e-learning systems capable of personalizing content and optimizing learning paths. This study provides a systematic analysis of adaptive e-learning algorithms within the framework of heutagogy, an educational paradigm that emphasizes learner autonomy, self-direction, and capability development. The convergence of adaptive technologies with heutagogical principles offers new avenues for creating more engaging and personalized learning environments. A critical review is conducted on three prominent algorithmic approaches: Bayesian Knowledge Tracing (BKT), Deep Knowledge Tracing (DKT), and Reinforcement Learning (RL). These models are evaluated based on their capacity to track learner progress, predict future performance, and adjust instructional strategies in real time. BKT models student knowledge probabilistically, DKT applies deep learning via recurrent neural networks to model learning sequences, and RL uses policy optimization to maximize long-term learning outcomes through feedback mechanisms. Empirical evidence from recent studies suggests that these AI-powered systems significantly enhance learner engagement, retention, and academic performance. However, challenges such as data privacy, algorithmic fairness, model interpretability, and ethical deployment remain central to future development. The study discusses the role of explainable AI (XAI) in addressing these challenges and proposes directions for integrating adaptive systems more ethically and effectively into heutagogical learning environments.

Keywords: Adaptive learning, heutagogy, artificial intelligence in education, self-directed learning, deep knowledge tracing (DKT)

[This article belongs to Journal of Computer Technology & Applications ]

How to cite this article:
Rupali A. Vinchurkar, Gajendra R. Bamnote. Adaptive E-Learning Algorithms and Heutagogy: A Systematic Analysis. Journal of Computer Technology & Applications. 2025; 16(03):33-38.
How to cite this URL:
Rupali A. Vinchurkar, Gajendra R. Bamnote. Adaptive E-Learning Algorithms and Heutagogy: A Systematic Analysis. Journal of Computer Technology & Applications. 2025; 16(03):33-38. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/jocta/article=2025/view=226948


References

  1. Corbett AT, Anderson JR. Knowledge tracing: Modeling the acquisition of procedural knowledge. User Model User-Adap Interact. 1994 Dec; 4(4): 253–78.
  2. Piech C, Bassen J, Huang J, Ganguli S, Sahami M, Guibas LJ, Sohl-Dickstein J. Deep knowledge tracing. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 28. 2015; 1: 505–513.
  3. Shen S, Mostafavi B. Exploring induced pedagogical strategies through a Markov decision process framework: Lessons learned. J Educ Data Min. 2018 Dec; 10(3): 27–68.
  4. Mandel T, Liu YE, Levine S, Brunskill E, Popovic Z. Offline policy evaluation across representations with applications to educational games. In AAMAS. 2014 May 5; 1077–1084.
  5. Kovanović V, Joksimović S, Gašević D, Siemens G, Hatala M. What public media reveals about MOOC s: A systematic analysis of news reports. Br J Educ Technol. 2015 May; 46(3): 510–27.
  6. Blaschke LM. Heutagogy and lifelong learning: A review of heutagogical practice and self-determined learning. Int Rev Res Open Distrib Learn. 2012 Jan 31; 13(1): 56–71.
  7. Correia A, Lobo V. Enhancing critical thinking in education through AI-driven gamification: The development and impact of the Adaptive Critical Thinking Enhancement System (ACTES). In EDULEARN24 Proceedings; IATED. 2024; 7768–7777.
  8. Molnar C. (2020). Interpretable machine learning. [Online]. Lulu.com. https://d1wqtxts1xzle7. cloudfront.net/103712558/Christoph_Molnar_Interpretable_Machine_Learning_lulu.com_20210426_-libre.pdf?1687621251=&response-content-disposition=inline%3B+filename%3D Interpretable_Machine_Learning.pdf&Expires=1753684236&Signature=YVvkqkYt1NRG5mV3vfVjdRZPjh4Q2ByvEbibpVf0EC-X6fVfctu5BrCjV6mlFZsY0HmkCmgsCbidbtEBFNx7ORcq 1hmRRCHenv4F1lvujJdBRtPu14zf2XLWRNDRqbOGj3VRuS17UotCIzFuKmi~LqGyXY0ZtpMfLWSGrzLn8vPZ5GEQoDCIX1Z~alidQkk~omuAxUlze~B~26zxhEM~N8xIjnHe7YC2tLKkFVmAfJI3RIDRznLq26tewUdnnLPMVkKFAPCpSaL3DuCrmiPaJbDuFEBOhrwJDnx5JTnJpqUbM8L1emewBypHdo3zbqKAQEprV3qiPZtKELeV8sclCA__&Key-Pair-Id=APKAJLOHF5GG SLRBV4ZA
  9. Boateng O, Boateng B. Algorithmic bias in educational systems: Examining the impact of AI-driven decision making in modern education. World J Adv Res Rev. 2025; 25(1): 2012–7.
  10. D’Mello SK, Graesser AC. 31 Feeling, Thinking, and Computing with Affect-Aware Learning. The Oxford handbook of affective computing. Oxford Academic; England. 2014 Dec 2; 419–434.
Regular Issue Subscription Original Research
Volume 16
Issue 03
Received 12/05/2025
Accepted 21/07/2025
Published 07/08/2025
Publication Time 87 Days
33


My IP

PlumX Metrics