CRITICAL REVIEW OF STUDY OF CONVENTIONAL AND PRE ENGINEERED BUILDING

Year : 2025 | Volume : 15 | Issue : 03 | Page : 48 53
    By

    Narendra M. Shete,

  • C. P. Pise,

  • Amol Kamble,

Abstract

Human race has steadily evolved over past centuries. Development of new technology, vigorous research, consistent efforts, indomitable will to find solutions for the problems, are the key factors to shape our future in way that everyone gets safe, secure and satisfactory life. Construction industries provides basic but most valuable service or product or we can say that construction industries fulfill the basic needs of individual and group of people by providing house (Residential Buildings) or structures like Industrial Buildings in exchange of money or fund. New development in construction industries can greatly affect the day to day life of every human being as in the sense of economy, safety and pacing of construction. In early 20 century metal buildings have helps humankind to make it through the fierce world war II era & in the early days of Industrial revolution. PEB is modern day solution for all the lacking structural aspects of conventional building construction. In this paper study has carried out of previous research done by other author on PEB structures. Some individual have mentioned in their paper that how PEB is practical to save money & time as compared to CSB. While other have explored the comparison between PEB & CSB and their results like deflection, quantity of steel required, seismic analysis and much more. CSB and PEB have same core concepts of structural frame work, only difference is that PEB structure’s components, parts are fabricated in industry or shop according to structural design and then assembled at site. While CSB structures are built by old way by constructing with available section in market, as of core frame work of industrial buildings there are two types 1) Building for short span consist of a frame made of continuous or double cantilevered girders over the columns. 2) Industrial building consist of steel structures supported on columns. Most of the author have used Staad Pro. Software for designing and analysis purposes.

Keywords: PEB structures, Comparison between PEB and CSB structures, Staad Pro., Structural optimization, PEB structural performance

[This article belongs to Recent Trends in Civil Engineering & Technology ]

How to cite this article:
Narendra M. Shete, C. P. Pise, Amol Kamble. CRITICAL REVIEW OF STUDY OF CONVENTIONAL AND PRE ENGINEERED BUILDING. Recent Trends in Civil Engineering & Technology. 2025; 15(03):48-53.
How to cite this URL:
Narendra M. Shete, C. P. Pise, Amol Kamble. CRITICAL REVIEW OF STUDY OF CONVENTIONAL AND PRE ENGINEERED BUILDING. Recent Trends in Civil Engineering & Technology. 2025; 15(03):48-53. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/rtcet/article=2025/view=216542


References

  • Muthu Meena M, Mr. Kammalakannan P., (2017) “Comparative study of seismic analysis and design of pre-engineered building with conventional industrial building on different bay spacing”. IJIRSET, Volume 06, Issue 5, May 2017, pages 8491-8497.
  • Balamuralikrishnan R, Ibrahim Shabbir Mohammedali, (2019) “Comparative study of two story car showroom using pre-engineered building (PEB) concepts based on British standards and Euro code”. Civil Engineering Journal, Volume 05, No 04, April 2019, pages 881-891.
  • Subodh S. Patil, Raviraj V. Jadhav, Pritam A. Mali, Mahesh M. Bhanuse, Murgesh R. Katty, (2017) “Analysis and design of pre-engineered building of an industrial warehouse”. TROI Researchgate, Volume 04, Issue 12, January 2017, pages 39-43.
  • Shrunkhal V Bhagatkar, Farman Iqbal Shaikh, Bhanu Prakash Gupta, Deepak Khorta, (2015) “A study on pre-engineered building – a construction technique”. IJERA, Volume 05, Issue 3 part 2, March 2015, pages 05-09.
  • Aijaz Ahmad Zende, Prof. A. V. Kulkarni, Aslam Hutagi, (2013) “Comparative study of analysis and design of pre-engineered building and conventional frame”. IOC2-JMCE, Volume 05, Issue 1, January- February 2013, pages 32-43.
  • Sai kiran Gone, Kailash Rao, Praadeep kumar Ramancharla, (2014) “Comparison of design procedure of pre-engineered building (PEB): a case study”. International Journal of Civil, Architectural, Structural and Construction Engineering, Volume 08, no. 4, 2014, pages 480-484.
  • Sravan Kumar, Sanjeev Rao, Madan Mohan, Dr. Sreenath Reddy, (2014) “Design and analysis of pre-engineered industrial building (PEB)”. IJAEM, Volume 03, no. 06, November 2014, pages 26-29.
  • Aakash Varma, Dr. Rajeev Chandak, (2022) “Analysis and design of pre-engineered building with different parameters”, IJRASET, volume 10, Issue 3, March 2022, page 1794-1802.
  • Swati Wakchaure, N. C. Dubey, (2016) “Design and comparative study of pre-engineered building”. IJEDR, Volume 04, Issue 2, 2016, pages 2108-2113.
  • Chetan Gurjar, Prof. J.N. Vyas, (2020) “Seismic analysis of pre-engineering steel structure using vertical irregularity”. IJSART, Volume 06, Issue 10, October 2020, pages 37-43.s
  • Sharayu S. Patil, Prof. S. P. Nirkhe, Dr. G. R. Gandhe, (2021) “Parametric evaluation of pre-engineered building (PEB) and conventional steel sheds”. IRJET, Volume 08, Issue 06, June 2021, pages 4558-4566.
  • Apurv Rajendra Thorat, Santosh K. Patil, (2017) “A study of performance of pre-engineered building of an industrial warehouse for dynamic load”. IRJET, Volume 04, Issue 06, June 2017, pages 2240-2246.
  • Nitin K. Jaiswal, Prof. Lavina Talawala, (2021) “Seismic evaluation of pre-engineered building & conventional steel building”. IRJET, Volume 08, Issue 01, January 2021, pages 1736-1739.
  • Rishabh V. Thakare, Rohan Kumar Choudhari, (2021) “Analysis & design of pentagonal shaped PEB structure with inclined column”. JETIER, Volume 08, Issue 8, August 2021, pages b658-b665.
  • Vishnu Sai, P. Poluraju, B. Venkat Rao, (2021) “Structural performance of pre-engineered building : A comparative study”. ICACE (IOP), 2021.
  • Sarda, M., Deshpande, B., Deo, S., & Karanjkar, R. (2018). A comparative study on Maslow’s theory and Indian Ashrama system. International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering, 8(2), 48-50.
  • Deo, S., & Deo, S. (2019). Cybersquatting: Threat to domain name. International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering, 8(6), 1432-1434.
  • Deo, S., & Deo, D. S. (2019). Domain name and its protection in India. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering.
  • Sarda, M., Deshpande, B., Deo, S., & Pathak, M. A. (2018). Intellectual Property And Mechanical Engineering-A Study Emphasizing The Importance Of Knowledge Of Intellectual Property Rights Amongst Mechanical Engineers. International Journal of Social Science and Economic Research, 3(12), 6591-6596.
  • Deo, S. S. (2016). Protection of good samaritans: A study in the light of supreme court’s decision in save life foundation case. Int J Law, 6, 12-3.
  • Sawant, R. A., & Mulani, A. O. (2022). Automatic PCB Track Design Machine. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, 7(9)
  • ABHANGRAO, M. R. et al. (2017). Design And Implementation Of 8-bit Vedic Multiplier. International Journal of Research Publications in Engineering and Technology (ISSN No: 2454-7875).
  • Gadade, B. et al. (2024). Iot based smart school bus and student monitoring system. Naturalista Campano, 28(1), 730-737.
  • Mulani, A. O. (2024). A Comprehensive Survey on Semi-Automatic Solar-Powered Pesticide Sprayers for Farming. Journal of Energy Engineering and Thermodynamics (JEET) ISSN, 2815-0945.
  • Salunkhe, S. S. et al. (2024). Solar Mount Design Using High-Density Polyethylene. NATURALISTA CAMPANO, 28(1).
Regular Issue Subscription Review Article
Volume 15
Issue 03
Received 22/04/2025
Accepted 20/06/2025
Published 09/07/2025
Publication Time 78 Days
315

Login


My IP

PlumX Metrics