Intelligent Medical Devices and Robotics in Modern Healthcare: Technological Advancements and Economic Considerations

Notice

This is an unedited manuscript accepted for publication and provided as an Article in Press for early access at the author’s request. The article will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and galley proof review before final publication. Please be aware that errors may be identified during production that could affect the content. All legal disclaimers of the journal apply.

Year : 2024 | Volume :11 | Issue : 03 | Page : –
By
vector

N.B. Mahesh Kumar,

  1. Associate Professor, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Hindusthan Institute of Technology College, Malumichampatti, Tamil Nadu, India

Abstract document.addEventListener(‘DOMContentLoaded’,function(){frmFrontForm.scrollToID(‘frm_container_abs_110672’);});Edit Abstract & Keyword

The integration of robots and intelligent medical devices in Intensive Care Units (ICUs) represents a significant advancement in healthcare technology. These systems, including robotic assistants, automated monitoring tools, and AI-powered diagnostic devices, are designed to enhance patient care, streamline workflows, and reduce human error. Robots in the ICU can assist with routine tasks such as medication delivery, patient repositioning, and even basic surgeries, enabling healthcare professionals to focus on critical patient needs. AI-powered intelligent medical devices utilize machine learning algorithms for real-time data analysis, improving the accuracy of patient monitoring and supporting better clinical decision-making. By continuously analyzing vital signs and medical data, these devices can predict potential complications and alert medical staff to intervene proactively. Despite the potential benefits, the adoption of robots and intelligent systems in ICUs raises several ethical and logistical concerns, including patient privacy, data security, and the potential for technology-induced errors. The human-machine collaboration in such critical environments also requires careful consideration of the role of healthcare professionals and the extent of automation. This paper explores the capabilities, challenges, and future implications of integrating robotics and intelligent medical devices in ICU settings, aiming to evaluate their impact on patient outcomes and the efficiency of critical care practices.

Keywords: medical devices, Intensive Care Units (ICUs), artificial intelligence, machine learning, and robotics, data security

[This article belongs to Journal of Advancements in Robotics (joarb)]

How to cite this article:
N.B. Mahesh Kumar. Intelligent Medical Devices and Robotics in Modern Healthcare: Technological Advancements and Economic Considerations. Journal of Advancements in Robotics. 2024; 11(03):-.
How to cite this URL:
N.B. Mahesh Kumar. Intelligent Medical Devices and Robotics in Modern Healthcare: Technological Advancements and Economic Considerations. Journal of Advancements in Robotics. 2024; 11(03):-. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/joarb/article=2024/view=0

Full Text PDF

Full Text PDF

References
document.addEventListener(‘DOMContentLoaded’,function(){frmFrontForm.scrollToID(‘frm_container_ref_110672’);});Edit

  1. Lai TJ, Heggie R, Kamaruzaman HF, Bouttell J, Boyd K. Economic Evaluations of Robotic-Assisted Surgery: Methods, Challenges and Opportunities. Applied Health Economics and Health Policy. 2024 Sep 27:1-5.
  2. Laptev VA, Ershova IV, Feyzrakhmanova DR. Medical applications of artificial intelligence (legal aspects and future prospects). Laws. 2021 Dec 29;11(1):3.
  3. Tian S, Yang W, Le Grange JM, Wang P, Huang W, Ye Z. Smart healthcare: making medical care more intelligent. Global Health Journal. 2019 Sep 1;3(3):62-5.
  4. Fiani B, Quadri SA, Farooqui M, Cathel A, Berman B, Noel J, Siddiqi J. Impact of robot-assisted spine surgery on health care quality and neurosurgical economics: a systemic review. Neurosurgical review. 2020 Feb;43:17-25.
  5. Kakhi K, Alizadehsani R, Kabir HD, Khosravi A, Nahavandi S, Acharya UR. The internet of medical things and artificial intelligence: trends, challenges, and opportunities. Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering. 2022 Jul 1;42(3):749-71.
  6. Iavazzo C, Gkegkes ID. Cost–benefit analysis of robotic surgery in gynaecological oncology. Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2017 Nov 1;45:7-18.
  7. Shuaib A, Arian H, Shuaib A. The increasing role of artificial intelligence in health care: will robots replace doctors in the future?. International journal of general medicine. 2020 Oct 19:891-6.
  8. Chauhan C, Singh A, Luthra S. Barriers to industry 4.0 adoption and its performance implications: An empirical investigation of emerging economy. Journal of cleaner production. 2021 Feb 20;285:124809.
  9. Rajan PV, Khlopas A, Klika A, Molloy R, Krebs V, Piuzzi NS. The cost-effectiveness of robotic-assisted versus manual total knee arthroplasty: a Markov model–based evaluation. JAAOS-Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2022 Feb 15;30(4):168-76.
  10. Navath S. Transforming Healthcare: The Impact and Future of Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare. Journal of Artificial intelligence and Machine Learning. 2021;1(1):16-21.
  11. Turchetti G, Palla I, Pierotti F, Cuschieri A. Economic evaluation of da Vinci-assisted robotic surgery: a systematic review. Surgical endoscopy. 2012 Mar;26:598-606.
  12. Kudratillaev M, Yakhshiboyev RE. The Role of Indigenous Medical Devices and Equipment Development in Medicine. Economics and Innovative Technologies. 2023 Oct 24;11(5):327-41.
  13. Camarillo DB, Krummel TM, Salisbury Jr JK. Robotic technology in surgery: past, present, and future. The American Journal of Surgery. 2004 Oct 1;188(4):2-15.
  14. Adeghe EP, Okolo CA, Ojeyinka OT. A review of emerging trends in telemedicine: Healthcare delivery transformations. International Journal of Life Science Research Archive. 2024;6(1):137-47.
  15. Fuertes-Guiró F, Girabent-Farrés M, Viteri-Velasco E. Opportunity cost in the economic evaluation of da Vinci robotic assisted surgery. The European Journal of Health Economics. 2016 Apr;17:245-56.
  16. Lo K, Stephenson M, Lockwood C. The economic cost of robotic rehabilitation for adult stroke patients: a systematic review. JBI Evidence Synthesis. 2019 Apr 1;17(4):520-47.
  17. Prabhod KJ. The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Reducing Healthcare Costs and Improving Operational Efficiency. Quarterly Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovations. 2024 Apr 16;9(2):47-59.
  18. Tan A, Ashrafian H, Scott AJ, Mason SE, Harling L, Athanasiou T, Darzi A. Robotic surgery: disruptive innovation or unfulfilled promise? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the first 30 years. Surgical endoscopy. 2016 Oct;30:4330-52.
  19. Hoeffel D, Goldstein L, Intwala D, Kaindl L, Dineen A, Patel L, Mayle R. Systematic review and meta-analysis of economic and healthcare resource utilization outcomes for robotic versus manual total knee arthroplasty. Journal of Robotic Surgery. 2023 Dec;17(6):2899-910.
  20. Fosch-Villaronga E, Drukarch H. On Healthcare Robots: Concepts, definitions, and considerations for healthcare robot governance. arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.03468. 2021 Jun 7.
Regular Issue Subscription Review Article
Volume 11
Issue 03
Received 18/10/2024
Accepted 23/10/2024
Published 04/11/2024
262

function myFunction2() {
var x = document.getElementById(“browsefigure”);
if (x.style.display === “block”) {
x.style.display = “none”;
}
else { x.style.display = “Block”; }
}
document.querySelector(“.prevBtn”).addEventListener(“click”, () => {
changeSlides(-1);
});
document.querySelector(“.nextBtn”).addEventListener(“click”, () => {
changeSlides(1);
});
var slideIndex = 1;
showSlides(slideIndex);
function changeSlides(n) {
showSlides((slideIndex += n));
}
function currentSlide(n) {
showSlides((slideIndex = n));
}
function showSlides(n) {
var i;
var slides = document.getElementsByClassName(“Slide”);
var dots = document.getElementsByClassName(“Navdot”);
if (n > slides.length) { slideIndex = 1; }
if (n (item.style.display = “none”));
Array.from(dots).forEach(
item => (item.className = item.className.replace(” selected”, “”))
);
slides[slideIndex – 1].style.display = “block”;
dots[slideIndex – 1].className += ” selected”;
}