Determining the Best Long-Term Luting Cement for Implant Retained Prosthesis Based on Bond Strength and Surface Integrity

Open Access

Year : 2024 | Volume :12 | Special Issue : 04 | Page : 119-129
By

Sanno Singh,

Pronob Kumar Sanyal,

Abhijeet Kore,

Karuna Pawashae,

Shivsagar Tewary,

Amit Jadav,

  1. Student, Department of Prosthodontics, Crown & Bridge, School of Dental Sciences Krishna Vishwa Vidyapeeth, Karad,, Maharshtra, India
  2. Professor and Head,, Department of Prosthodontics, Crown & Bridge, School of Dental Sciences Krishna Vishwa Vidyapeeth, Karad,, Maharshtra, India
  3. Professor and Head,, Department of Prosthodontics, Crown & Bridge, School of Dental Sciences Krishna Vishwa Vidyapeeth, Karad,, Maharshtra, India
  4. Assistant Professor,, Department of Prosthodontics, Crown & Bridge, School of Dental Sciences Krishna Vishwa Vidyapeeth, Karad,, Maharshtra, India
  5. Associate Professor,, Department of Prosthodontics, Crown & Bridge, School of Dental Sciences Krishna Vishwa Vidyapeeth, Karad,, Maharshtra, India
  6. Assistant Professor,, Department of Prosthodontics, Crown & Bridge, School of Dental Sciences Krishna Vishwa Vidyapeeth, Karad,, Maharshtra, India

Abstract

‘]

Implant-retained prostheses play a crucial role in modern dentistry, necessitating reliable luting cements to ensure their longevity and functionality. This study aimed to determine the best long-term luting cement for implant-retained prostheses based on bond strength and surface integrity. The success of implant-retained prostheses relies heavily on the quality of the luting cement used to secure the restoration to the implant abutment. The investigation will employ a series of standardized bond strength tests, such as shear and tensile bond strength assessments, to evaluate the adhesive properties of each luting cement when applied to implant abutments and prosthesis components. Five commonly used luting cements were evaluated for their bond strength and surface integrity over an extended period. A series of laboratory tests, including tensile bond strength testing and surface analysis, were conducted to assess the performance of each luting cement. Results revealed significant variations in bond strength and surface integrity among the tested cement. The findings of this study provide valuable insights into selecting the most suitable luting cement for the long-term stability and durability of implant-retained prostheses.

Keywords: Luting cement, implant-retained prosthesis, bond strength, surface integrity, long-term stability, dental materials, Polymerised.

[This article belongs to Special Issue under section in Journal of Polymer and Composites (jopc)]

How to cite this article:
Sanno Singh, Pronob Kumar Sanyal, Abhijeet Kore, Karuna Pawashae, Shivsagar Tewary, Amit Jadav. Determining the Best Long-Term Luting Cement for Implant Retained Prosthesis Based on Bond Strength and Surface Integrity. Journal of Polymer and Composites. 2024; 12(04):119-129.
How to cite this URL:
Sanno Singh, Pronob Kumar Sanyal, Abhijeet Kore, Karuna Pawashae, Shivsagar Tewary, Amit Jadav. Determining the Best Long-Term Luting Cement for Implant Retained Prosthesis Based on Bond Strength and Surface Integrity. Journal of Polymer and Composites. 2024; 12(04):119-129. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/jopc/article=2024/view=171753


Browse Figures

References ‘]

  1. Alvarez-Arenal A, Gonzalez-Gonzalez, deLlanos-Lanchares H, Brizuela-Velasco A, Pinés-Hueso J, Ellakuria-Echebarria J. Retention strength after compressive cyclic loading of five luting agents used in implant-supported prostheses. BioMed research international. 2016;
  2. Shadid and N. Sadaqa, “A comparison between screw- and cement-retained implant prostheses. A literature review,” Journal of Oral Implantology, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 298–307, 2012
  3. Ramp MH, Dixon DL, Ramp LC, Breeding LC, Barber LL. Tensile bond strengths of provisional luting agents used with an implant system. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 1999 May 1;81(5):510-4.
  4. Ayyildiz S, Emir F, Tunc EP, Sen D. Bonding resistance of various luting cements to fixed prosthodontic restorative materials. Applied Adhesion Science. 2015 Dec;3(1):1-0
  5. https://www.corrosionpedia.com/Shear Strength
  6. Kim Y, Yamashita J, Shotwell JL, Chong KH, Wang HL. The comparison of provisional luting agents and abutment surface roughness on the retention of provisional implant-supported crowns. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 2006 Jun 1;95(6):450-5.
  7. Kunt GE, Ceylon G, Yilmaz N. Effect of surface treatments on implant crown retention. Journal of Dental Sciences. 2010 Sep 1;5(3):131-5.
  8. Sathish S, Lakshmi S, Patel P, Annapoorni H. Effect of thermocycling on the micro-tensile bond strength between self-adhesive resin cement and nonphosphate monomer cements on zirconium-oxide ceramics. Indian Journal of Dental Research. 2019 Jan 1;30(1):73.
  9. Rani S, Verma M, Gill S, Gupta R. Comparative evaluation of bonding strength of computer aided machined ceramic, pressable ceramic, and milled metal implant abutment copings and effect of surface conditioning on bonding strength: An in vitro study. The Journal of the Indian Prosthodontic Society. 2016 Apr;16(2):142.
  10. Imthiyas SM, Subramanian B, Karupiah P, Kirubakaran A, Karthik VC, Ganesan S. Effect of various luting agents on retention of cement-retained implant restorations with different modifications-An in-vitro study. Indian Journal of Multidisciplinary Dentistry. 2018 Jul 1;8(2):82.
  11. Frisch E, Ratka-Kruger P, Weigl P, et al. Extraoral cementation technique to minimize cement-associated peri-implant marginal bone loss: can a thin layer of zinc oxide cement provide sufficient retention? Int J Prosthodont 2016;29(4):360–2.
  12. Wadhwani CPK, editor. Chapter 4: Implant luting cements. In: WadhwaniCPK, Schwedhelm ER, Tarica DY, Chung K-H, editors. Cementationin Dental Implantology – An Evidence Based Guide. New York:Springer; 2015:47–82.
  13. Wadhwani CPK, editor. Chapter 5: Residual excess cement detection.In: Wadhwani CPK, Schwedhelm ER, Tarica DY, Chung K-H, editors.Cementation in Dental Implantology – An Evidence Based Guide. NewYork: Springer; 2015:83–99.
  14. Wadhwani C, Hess T, Faber T, Piñeyro A, Chen CS. A descriptive study of the radiographic density of implant restorative cements. J Prosthet Dent. 2010;103(5):295–302.
  15. Sathyanarayan S, Balavadivel T, Guru RC, Sande AR, Rajendran V, Sengottaiyan AK. Retention of various luting agents used with implant-supported crowns. Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences. 2021 Nov 1;13(Suppl 2):S1206-9.

Special Issue Open Access Original Research
Volume 12
Special Issue 04
Received April 2, 2024
Accepted July 8, 2024
Published July 19, 2024

Check Our other Platform for Workshops in the field of AI, Biotechnology & Nanotechnology.
Check Out Platform for Webinars in the field of AI, Biotech. & Nanotech.