Study of Rehydration and Dehydration behavior of Scolecite by insitu Raman spectroscopy

[{“box”:0,”content”:”[if 992 equals=”Open Access”]n

n

n

n

Open Access

nn

n

n[/if 992]n

n

Year : August 17, 2024 at 10:39 am | [if 1553 equals=””] Volume : [else] Volume :[/if 1553] | [if 424 equals=”Regular Issue”]Issue[/if 424][if 424 equals=”Special Issue”]Special Issue[/if 424] [if 424 equals=”Conference”][/if 424] : | Page : –

n

n

n

n

n

n

By

n

[foreach 286]n

vector

n

n

Dr. Radhika Ikkurti,

n

    n t

  • n

n

n[/foreach]

n

n[if 2099 not_equal=”Yes”]n

    [foreach 286] [if 1175 not_equal=””]n t

  1. Assistant Professor G.Narayanamma Institute of Technology & Science (For Women). Shaikpet , Hyderabad Telangana India
  2. n[/if 1175][/foreach]

n[/if 2099][if 2099 equals=”Yes”][/if 2099]n

n

Abstract

nThe study of structural changes of stretching and bending modes around 3000-4000cm-1 and 700-1800cm-1 in the temperature range of 299 to 503 K during the dehydration of naturally occurring scolecite was investigated using in-situ Raman spectroscopy. A Raman spectrum from 3000-4000cm-1 was measured for a fibrous zeolite called scolecite to regulate the behavior of water molecules in the passages. The extending vibrations of H2O molecules of scolecite are located between 3077 – 3600cm-1 and bending vibrations occurred around 1666cm-1. Gradual decrease in the intensity of the water modes at 1588cm-1, 1659cm-1, 1664cm-1 in the bending region during dehydration indicates the loss of water molecules in scolecite is similar to the earlier reports by prasad etal..In support of
the above results a general phase transition for natural scolecite at 498K in the thermo gram of scolecite was observed.The zeolite group shows a broad range of functional phase transformations when they are increased to higher temperatures.We also observed the topical behaviour of H2O molecules in zeolite that is losss of water and sediment mass loss with change of temperature using DSC and Raman Spectroscopic studies.we found that the transition temperature of the scolecite sample is found at around 476K using DSC.The two-step behaviour is very well observed by thermal analysis and shift 1664cm-1 to 1646cm-1 , absence of 1588 cm-1 mode at 498K indicates the loss of water molecules studied.As there will be no practical mass change insignificantly,Undistinguished mass loss corresponds to little or no slope in the TGA trace of the specimen.

n

n

n

Keywords: Dehydration mechanisms, scolecite, stretching,bending modes,Water Loss, Ramanspectroscopy.

n[if 424 equals=”Regular Issue”][This article belongs to Journal of Polymer and Composites(jopc)]

n

[/if 424][if 424 equals=”Special Issue”][This article belongs to Special Issue under section in Journal of Polymer and Composites(jopc)][/if 424][if 424 equals=”Conference”]This article belongs to Conference [/if 424]

n

aWQ6MTY3NTgzfGZpbGVuYW1lOjlmZmU4Y2YwLWZpMS5wbmd8c2l6ZTp0aHVtYm5haWw=

n

n

How to cite this article: Dr. Radhika Ikkurti. Study of Rehydration and Dehydration behavior of Scolecite by insitu Raman spectroscopy. Journal of Polymer and Composites. August 17, 2024; ():-.

n

How to cite this URL: Dr. Radhika Ikkurti. Study of Rehydration and Dehydration behavior of Scolecite by insitu Raman spectroscopy. Journal of Polymer and Composites. August 17, 2024; ():-. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/jopc/article=August 17, 2024/view=0

nn[if 992 equals=”Open Access”] Full Text PDF Download[/if 992] n

n[if 992 not_equal=’Open Access’] [/if 992]n

nn

nn[if 379 not_equal=””]n

Browse Figures

n

n

[foreach 379]n

n[/foreach]n

n

n

n[/if 379]n

n

References

n[if 1104 equals=””]n

  1. Joshi M S, Choudhari A L, Mohan Rao P & Kanitkar R G, Thermochimica Acta, 64 (1983) 39.

 

  1. Gottardi G, and Galli E, Natural zeolites, Springer-Verlag (1985) Berlin.

 

  1. FTIR studies on structural changes induced during dehydration and rehydration PSR Prasad &

K.Shiva Prasad ,chap-1,pages 2,3.  

  1. Infrared spectroscopic study of phase transitions in natural scolecite K Shiva Prasad, P S R Prasad

& S R Sharma , 2004.  

  1. Stahl K & Hanson J C, J Appl Cryst , 27 (1994) 543.

 

  1. FTIR STUDY OF DEHYDRATION DYNAMICS IN NATURAL ZEOLITES Shiva Prasad and

P.S.R. Prasad. ,2004.  

  1. Behavior of H2O molecules in the channels of natrolite and scolecite : A Raman and IR

spectroscopic investigation of hydrous microporous silicates,American  mineralogist,volume 91,pages 1039-1048,2006, B.A. KOLESOV AND C.A. GEIGER2,*  

  1. A neutron diffraction study of the bonding of zeolitic water in scolecite at 20 K. Zeitschrift f¸r

Kristallographie,171, 141ñ154.Kvick, Å., StÂhl, K., and Smith, J.V. (1985)  

  1. Experimental investigations of methane hydrate in sediment suspensions Ikkurti Radhika,

International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7 (4.5) (2018) 651-653  

  1. Neutron diffraction study of natrolite, Na2Al2Si3O10⋅2H2O, at 20 K. Acta Crystallographica, C40,

1658ñ1662. Artioli, G., Smith, J.V., and Kvick, Å. (1984)  

  1. Influence of Sediment Structural Properties and Their Dynamics in the Formation And

Dissociation Of Methane Hydrates. Ikkurti Radhika et al./ Materials Today: Proceedings 5 17572–17578 (2018)  

  1. Scolecite, Part I: Refinement of high-order data .Stuckenschmidt, E., Joswig, W., Baur, W.H., and

Hofmeister, W. (1997).

nn[/if 1104][if 1104 not_equal=””]n

    [foreach 1102]n t

  1. [if 1106 equals=””], [/if 1106][if 1106 not_equal=””],[/if 1106]
  2. n[/foreach]

n[/if 1104]

nn


nn[if 1114 equals=”Yes”]n

n[/if 1114]

n

n

[if 424 not_equal=””][else]Ahead of Print[/if 424] Open Access Original Research

n

n

[if 2146 equals=”Yes”][/if 2146][if 2146 not_equal=”Yes”][/if 2146]n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n[if 1748 not_equal=””]

[else]

[/if 1748]n

n

n

Volume
[if 424 equals=”Regular Issue”]Issue[/if 424][if 424 equals=”Special Issue”]Special Issue[/if 424] [if 424 equals=”Conference”][/if 424]
Received March 19, 2024
Accepted June 12, 2024
Published August 17, 2024

n

n

n

n

n

n nfunction myFunction2() {nvar x = document.getElementById(“browsefigure”);nif (x.style.display === “block”) {nx.style.display = “none”;n}nelse { x.style.display = “Block”; }n}ndocument.querySelector(“.prevBtn”).addEventListener(“click”, () => {nchangeSlides(-1);n});ndocument.querySelector(“.nextBtn”).addEventListener(“click”, () => {nchangeSlides(1);n});nvar slideIndex = 1;nshowSlides(slideIndex);nfunction changeSlides(n) {nshowSlides((slideIndex += n));n}nfunction currentSlide(n) {nshowSlides((slideIndex = n));n}nfunction showSlides(n) {nvar i;nvar slides = document.getElementsByClassName(“Slide”);nvar dots = document.getElementsByClassName(“Navdot”);nif (n > slides.length) { slideIndex = 1; }nif (n (item.style.display = “none”));nArray.from(dots).forEach(nitem => (item.className = item.className.replace(” selected”, “”))n);nslides[slideIndex – 1].style.display = “block”;ndots[slideIndex – 1].className += ” selected”;n}n”}]