[{“box”:0,”content”:”[if 992 equals=”Open Access”]n
n
Open Access
nn
n
n[/if 992]n
n
n
n
n
n
Satish kumar Yadav, Manyta Yadav, Mohd. Wasiullah, Piyush Yadav, Priyanshu Upadhyay,
n
- n t
n
n
n[/foreach]
n
n[if 2099 not_equal=”Yes”]n
- [foreach 286] [if 1175 not_equal=””]n t
- Associate Professor, Professor, Principal, Academic Head, Research Scholar Department of Pharmacy, Prasad Institute of Technology, Jaunpur, Department of Pharmacy, Prasad Institute of Technology, Jaunpur, Department of Pharmacy, Prasad Institute of Technology, Jaunpur, Department of Pharmacy, Prasad Institute of Technology, Jaunpur, Department of Pharmacy, Prasad Institute of Technology, Jaunpur Uttar Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh India, India, India, India, India
n[/if 1175][/foreach]
n[/if 2099][if 2099 equals=”Yes”][/if 2099]n
Abstract
nQuantitative Structure-Activity Relationship (QSAR) stands at the forefront of Computer-Aided Drug Design (CADD), providing a systematic framework for understanding the relationship between the chemical structure of molecules and their biological activity. This review delves into the multifaceted realm of QSAR methodologies within the landscape of drug discovery. Through an exploration of diverse QSAR models, molecular descriptors, validation techniques, and recent advancements, this article aims to elucidate the pivotal role of QSAR in accelerating the development of novel therapeutics. By dissecting the intricacies of QSAR analysis and its application in rational drug design, this review sheds light on the transformative potential of computational modeling in shaping the future of pharmaceutical research. Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship (QSAR) is a pivotal technique in Computer-Aided Drug Design (CADD) that aids in the rational design of novel drug candidates. This review provides a comprehensive overview of QSAR methodologies, their applications, strengths, limitations, and recent advancements in the field of CADD. By exploring various QSAR models, datasets, molecular descriptors, and statistical techniques, this article aims to shed light on the significance of QSAR in accelerating drug discovery processes.
n
Keywords: Receptor, drug designing, biological interaction, molecular docking, modelling, drug discovery, computer aided drug design, docking, multi-target searching, QSAR.
n[if 424 equals=”Regular Issue”][This article belongs to Research & Reviews: A Journal of Pharmaceutical Science(rrjops)]
n
n
n
n
n
nn[if 992 equals=”Open Access”] Full Text PDF Download[/if 992] n
nn[if 379 not_equal=””]n
Browse Figures
n
n[/if 379]n
References
n[if 1104 equals=””]n
1. T. Hou and X. Xu, “Recent development and application of virtual screening in drug discovery: an overview,” Current Pharmaceutical Design, vol. 10, no. 9, pp. 1011–1033, 2004.
2. W. Yu and A. D. Mac Kerell, “Computer-aided drug design methods,” in Antibiotics, Humana Press, New York, NY, 2017.
3. S. J. Y. Macalino, V. Gosu, S. Hong, and S. Choi, “Role of computer-aided drug design in modern drug discovery,” Archives of Pharmacal Research, vol. 38, no. 9, pp. 1686– 1701, 2015.
4. H.-J. Huang, H. W. Yu, C.-Y. Chen et al., “Current developments of computer-aided drug design,” Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers, vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 623–635, 2010.
5. M. Hassan Baig, K. Ahmad, S. Roy et al., “Computer aided drug design: success and limitations,” Current Pharmaceutical Design, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 572–581, 2016.
6. M. Batool, B. Ahmad, and S. Choi, “A structure-based drug discovery paradigm,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 20, no. 11, p. 2783, 2019.
7. S. Kalyaanamoorthy and Y.-P. P. Chen, “Structure-based drug design to augment hit discovery,” Drug Discovery Today, vol. 16, no. 17–18, pp. 831–839, 2011.
8. D. E. Clark, “What has computer-aided molecular design ever done for drug discovery?,” Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 103–110, 2006.
9. A. C. Anderson, “The process of structure-based drug design,” Chemistry & Biology, vol. 10, no. 9, pp. 787–797, 2003.
10. X. Wang, K. Song, L. Li, and L. Chen, “Structure-based drug design strategies and challenges,” Current Topics in Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 18, no. 12, pp. 998–1006, 2018.
11. V. K. Vyas, R. D. Ukawala, C. Chintha, and M. Ghate, “Homology modeling a fast tool for drug discovery: current perspectives,” Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 1–17, 2012.
12. I. M. Kapetanovic, “Computer-aided drug discovery and development (CADDD): in silico-chemico- biological approach,” Chemico-Biological Interactions, vol. 171, no. 2, pp. 165–176, 2008.
13. S. F. Sousa, P. A. Fernandes, and M. J. Ramos,“Protein-ligand docking: current status and future challenges,” Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics, vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 15–26, 2006.
14. M. Karplus and J. A. McCammon, “Molecular dynamics simulations of biomolecules,” Nature Structural Biology, vol. 9, no. 9, pp. 646–652, 2002.
15. J. C. Phillips, G. Zheng, S. Kumar, and L. V. Kalé, “NAMD: Biomolecular simulation on thousands of processors,” in ACM/IEEE SC 2002 Conference (SC’02), p. 36, Baltimore, MD, USA, 2002.
16. J. A. Rackers, Z. Wang, C. Lu et al., “Tinker 8: software tools for molecular design,” Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation, vol. 14, no. 10, pp. 5273–5289, 2018.
17. W. Smith, C. W. Yong, and P. M. Rodger, “DL_POLY: application to molecular simulation,” Molecular Simulation, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 385–471, 2002.
18. P. Prathipati, A. Dixit, and A. K. Saxena, “Computer-aided drug design: integration of structure-based and ligand-based approaches in drug design,” Current Computer-Aided Drug Design, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 133–148, 2007.
19. D. Schaller, D. sribar, T. Noonan et al., “Next generation 3D pharmacophore modeling,” Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Molecular Science, vol. 10, no. 4, article e1468, 2020.
20. J. H. Van Drie, “Generation of three-dimensional pharmacophore models,” Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Molecular Science, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 449–464, 2013.
21. C. C. Melo-Filho, R. C. Braga, and C. H. Andrade, “3D-QSAR approaches in drug design: perspectives to generate reliable CoMFA models,” Current Computer-Aided Drug Design, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 148–159, 2014.
22. A. Vuorinen and D. Schuster, “Methods for generating and applying pharmacophore models as virtual screening filters and for bioactivity profiling,” Methods, vol. 71, pp. 113–134, 2015.
23. T. Klabunde, C. Giegerich, and A. Evers, “Sequence-derived three-dimensional pharmacophore models for G-proteincoupled receptors and their application in virtual screening,” Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 52, no. 9, pp. 2923–2932, 2009.
nn[/if 1104][if 1104 not_equal=””]n
- [foreach 1102]n t
- [if 1106 equals=””], [/if 1106][if 1106 not_equal=””],[/if 1106]
n[/foreach]
n[/if 1104]
nn
nn[if 1114 equals=”Yes”]n
n[/if 1114]
n
n
n
Research & Reviews: A Journal of Pharmaceutical Science
n
n
n
n
n
n
| Volume | 15 | |
| [if 424 equals=”Regular Issue”]Issue[/if 424][if 424 equals=”Special Issue”]Special Issue[/if 424] [if 424 equals=”Conference”][/if 424] | 02 | |
| Received | May 10, 2024 | |
| Accepted | May 15, 2024 | |
| Published | July 19, 2024 |
n
n
n
n
n
n nfunction myFunction2() {nvar x = document.getElementById(“browsefigure”);nif (x.style.display === “block”) {nx.style.display = “none”;n}nelse { x.style.display = “Block”; }n}ndocument.querySelector(“.prevBtn”).addEventListener(“click”, () => {nchangeSlides(-1);n});ndocument.querySelector(“.nextBtn”).addEventListener(“click”, () => {nchangeSlides(1);n});nvar slideIndex = 1;nshowSlides(slideIndex);nfunction changeSlides(n) {nshowSlides((slideIndex += n));n}nfunction currentSlide(n) {nshowSlides((slideIndex = n));n}nfunction showSlides(n) {nvar i;nvar slides = document.getElementsByClassName(“Slide”);nvar dots = document.getElementsByClassName(“Navdot”);nif (n > slides.length) { slideIndex = 1; }nif (n (item.style.display = “none”));nArray.from(dots).forEach(nitem => (item.className = item.className.replace(” selected”, “”))n);nslides[slideIndex – 1].style.display = “block”;ndots[slideIndex – 1].className += ” selected”;n}n”}]