Factors Affecting Shear Stress on Tablet Hardness and Disintegration

[{“box”:0,”content”:”[if 992 equals=”Open Access”]n

n

n

n

Open Access

nn

n

n[/if 992]n

n

Year : July 18, 2024 at 2:55 pm | [if 1553 equals=””] Volume :15 [else] Volume :15[/if 1553] | [if 424 equals=”Regular Issue”]Issue[/if 424][if 424 equals=”Special Issue”]Special Issue[/if 424] [if 424 equals=”Conference”][/if 424] : 02 | Page : 1-20

n

n

n

n

n

n

By

n

[foreach 286]n

n

n

Sudipta Roy,

n

    n t

  • n

n

n[/foreach]

n

n[if 2099 not_equal=”Yes”]n

    [foreach 286] [if 1175 not_equal=””]n t

  1. Assistant Professor Department of Pharmaceutics, Bengal College of Pharmaceutical Technology West Bengal India
  2. n[/if 1175][/foreach]

n[/if 2099][if 2099 equals=”Yes”][/if 2099]n

n

Abstract

nThe quality and effectiveness of pharmaceutical tablets depend heavily on several factors influencing shear stress on tablet hardness and disintegration. These factors include formulation composition, wherein the selection and concentration of excipients and active ingredients affect how the tablet material responds to shear stress. Additionally, the compression force, speed, and duration during tablet compression are critical, impacting tablet hardness and disintegration properties. Tablet geometry and design, along with tablet press conditions, also contribute to variations in shear stress. Environmental factors and the use of lubricants further influence shear stress and tablet characteristics. It is essential to comprehend and regulate these factors to optimize tablet manufacturing processes and ensure the uniformity and durability of pharmaceutical tablets. In tablet manufacturing, optimizing performance requires systematic process monitoring and optimization. The tablet formulation is optimized through steps like API and excipient selection, pre-formulation studies, formulation development, and optimization studies. Shearing Stress Monitoring: To utilize inline sensors such as load cells or torque sensors for real-time monitoring throughout manufacturing. Tablet Hardness Monitoring: To evaluate tablet hardness during production using hardness testers, and adjust parameters as needed for consistency. Disintegration Testing: To conduct tests to assess disintegration performance, and correlate results with shearing stress levels for optimization. Process Optimization: To implement statistical process control (SPC) and root cause analysis to identify and address issues, optimizing parameters accordingly. Continuous Improvement: To foster a culture of ongoing optimization, promoting collaboration and updating SOPs based on insights gained from monitoring. Systematic monitoring and optimization are key to producing high-quality tablets consistently. Shearing stress significantly influences tablet manufacturing, affecting both disintegration and hardness. It compromises tablet structure, leading to delayed disintegration or surface defects. Shearing stress also consolidates particles, resulting in harder tablets, but excessive stress can lead to over-compression. To optimize manufacturing, control shearing stress by adjusting compression force, optimizing formulation and lubrication, modifying tooling design, and continuously monitoring parameters like clearance and press speed. Effective management of shearing stress ensures high-quality tablets with reliable performance.

n

n

n

Keywords: Shearing stress, disintegration, compression, hardness, shearing stress monitoring.

n[if 424 equals=”Regular Issue”][This article belongs to Research & Reviews: A Journal of Pharmaceutical Science(rrjops)]

n

[/if 424][if 424 equals=”Special Issue”][This article belongs to Special Issue under section in Research & Reviews: A Journal of Pharmaceutical Science(rrjops)][/if 424][if 424 equals=”Conference”]This article belongs to Conference [/if 424]

n

n

n

How to cite this article: Sudipta Roy. Factors Affecting Shear Stress on Tablet Hardness and Disintegration. Research & Reviews: A Journal of Pharmaceutical Science. July 18, 2024; 15(02):1-20.

n

How to cite this URL: Sudipta Roy. Factors Affecting Shear Stress on Tablet Hardness and Disintegration. Research & Reviews: A Journal of Pharmaceutical Science. July 18, 2024; 15(02):1-20. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/rrjops/article=July 18, 2024/view=0

nn[if 992 equals=”Open Access”] Full Text PDF Download[/if 992] n

n[if 992 not_equal=’Open Access’] [/if 992]nn

n

nn[if 379 not_equal=””]n

Browse Figures

n

n

[foreach 379]n

n[/foreach]n

n

n

n[/if 379]n

n

References

n[if 1104 equals=””]n

1. Peck GE, Baley GJ, McCurdy VE, Banker GS. Tablet formulation and design. Pharmaceutical dosage forms. Marcel Dekker, New York. 1989 Jun 5:75–130.
2. Ubhe TS, Gedam P. A brief overview on tablet and it’s types. Journal of Advancement in Pharmacology. 2020 Oct 27;1(1):21–31.
3. Oh E, Kim U, Lee BJ, Moon C. Multivariate statistical optimization of tablet formulations incorporating high doses of a dry herbal extract. Pharmaceutics. 2019 Feb 13;11(2):79.
4. Nakamura S, Otsuka N, Yoshino Y, Sakamoto T, Yuasa H. Predicting the occurrence of sticking during tablet production by shear testing of a pharmaceutical powder. Chemical and Pharmaceutical Bulletin. 2016 May 1;64(5):512–6.
5. Jakubowska E, Ciepluch N. Blend segregation in tablets manufacturing and its effect on drug content uniformity—a review. Pharmaceutics. 2021 Nov 11;13(11):1909.
6. Wu CY, Ruddy OM, Bentham AC, Hancock BC, Best SM, Elliott JA. Modelling the mechanical behaviour of pharmaceutical powders during compaction. Powder technology. 2005 Apr 29;152(1–3):107–17.
7. Saeed Matty Samarjy R. Re-design punch and die of the laboratory pharmaceutical tablet press machine. Al-Rafidain Engineering Journal (AREJ). 2010 Oct 28;18(5):123-36.
8. Mohan S. Compression physics of pharmaceutical powders: a review. Int J Pharm Sci Res. 2012 Jun 1;3(06):1580–92.
9. Roopwani R. Role of mechanical stress, excipients and coprocessing on tablet mechanical properties (Doctoral dissertation, Duquesne University).
10. Bhowmik D, Duraivel S, AN R, Kumar KS. Tablet manufacturing process and defects of tablets. Elixir Pharmacy. 2014 May 10;70:24368–74.
11. Wood JR. Tablet Manufacture; Its History, Pharmacy and Practice. Lippincott; 1906.
12. Sinka IC, Cunningham JC, Zavaliangos A. Analysis of tablet compaction. II. Finite element analysis of density distributions in convex tablets. Journal of pharmaceutical sciences. 2004 Aug 1;93(8):2040–53.
13. Wang B, Sun X, Xiang J, Guo X, Cheng Z, Liu W, Tan S. A critical review on granulation of pharmaceuticals and excipients: Principle, analysis and typical applications. Powder Technology. 2022 Mar 1;401:117329.
14. Troup GM, Georgakis C. Process systems engineering tools in the pharmaceutical industry. Computers & Chemical Engineering. 2013 Apr 5;51:157–71.
15. Saddik J. Investigating and Predicting Tablet Sticking Using Powder Rheology, Thermal Analysis. and Molecular Simulation (Doctoral dissertation, Long Island University, The Brooklyn Center).
16. Shinebaum R. Investigating the mechanical properties of pharmaceutical excipients in granule and tablet production (Doctoral dissertation, University of Birmingham).

 

nn[/if 1104][if 1104 not_equal=””]n

    [foreach 1102]n t

  1. [if 1106 equals=””], [/if 1106][if 1106 not_equal=””],[/if 1106]
  2. n[/foreach]

n[/if 1104]

nn


nn[if 1114 equals=”Yes”]n

n[/if 1114]

n

n

[if 424 not_equal=””]Regular Issue[else]Published[/if 424] Subscription Original Research

n

n

[if 2146 equals=”Yes”][/if 2146][if 2146 not_equal=”Yes”][/if 2146]n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n[if 1748 not_equal=””]

[else]

[/if 1748]n

n

n

Volume 15
[if 424 equals=”Regular Issue”]Issue[/if 424][if 424 equals=”Special Issue”]Special Issue[/if 424] [if 424 equals=”Conference”][/if 424] 02
Received April 19, 2024
Accepted May 9, 2024
Published July 18, 2024

n

n

n

n

n

n nfunction myFunction2() {nvar x = document.getElementById(“browsefigure”);nif (x.style.display === “block”) {nx.style.display = “none”;n}nelse { x.style.display = “Block”; }n}ndocument.querySelector(“.prevBtn”).addEventListener(“click”, () => {nchangeSlides(-1);n});ndocument.querySelector(“.nextBtn”).addEventListener(“click”, () => {nchangeSlides(1);n});nvar slideIndex = 1;nshowSlides(slideIndex);nfunction changeSlides(n) {nshowSlides((slideIndex += n));n}nfunction currentSlide(n) {nshowSlides((slideIndex = n));n}nfunction showSlides(n) {nvar i;nvar slides = document.getElementsByClassName(“Slide”);nvar dots = document.getElementsByClassName(“Navdot”);nif (n > slides.length) { slideIndex = 1; }nif (n (item.style.display = “none”));nArray.from(dots).forEach(nitem => (item.className = item.className.replace(” selected”, “”))n);nslides[slideIndex – 1].style.display = “block”;ndots[slideIndex – 1].className += ” selected”;n}n”}]