[{“box”:0,”content”:”[if 992 equals=”Open Access”]
Open Access
n
[/if 992]n
n
n
n
n
- n t
n
Sachin Chavan, R.S. Lavate, M.K. Beldar, Avishi Saini
[/foreach]
n
n
n[if 2099 not_equal=”Yes”]n
- [foreach 286] [if 1175 not_equal=””]n t
- Professor, Assistant Professor, Assistant Professor, Student, Mechanical Engineering Department, Bharati Vidyapeeth (DU) College of Engineering, Pune, Mechanical Engineering Department, Bharati Vidyapeeth (DU) College of Engineering, Pune, Mechanical Engineering Department, Bharati Vidyapeeth (DU) College of Engineering, Pune, Mechanical Engineering Department, Bharati Vidyapeeth (DU) College of Engineering, Pune, Maharashtra, Maharashtra, Maharashtra, Maharashtra, India, India, India, India
n[/if 1175][/foreach]
[/if 2099][if 2099 equals=”Yes”][/if 2099]nn
Abstract
nA mobile back cover protects phone from dents and scratches if anyone accidentally drop it. Most importantly, they enable a good grip on the phone. Cases, which are designed to attach to, support, or otherwise hold a Smartphone, are popular accessories for a mobile phone. Mobile back case measures are based on the display inches (e.g. 5 inch display). Many other different types are Pouches and sleeves, holsters, shells, fitted cases, flip cases and wallets, screen protection and body films, Drop and shock protection, Leather case and Cases with integrated kick stands. Mobile covers can also personalize as per customer’s needs. These are the result of the relatively “naked” designs produced by manufacturers such as Apple, where the metal and glass components of the device are exposed and vulnerable to damage. This research paper mainly deals with a detailed and in-depth study of mobile back cover from a manufacturer’s point of view such that the problems related to the cover are effectively minimized and can satisfy consumers requirements and desires
n
Keywords: Mobile back cover, market survey, Product architecture, modular, quality functional deployment, concept generation, aesthetic, ergonomics, design for manufacturing, design for environment, product life cycle
n[if 424 equals=”Regular Issue”][This article belongs to International Journal of Industrial and Product Design Engineering(ijipde)]
n
n
n
n
n
n
n[if 992 equals=”Open Access”] Full Text PDF Download[else] nvar fieldValue = “[user_role]”;nif (fieldValue == ‘indexingbodies’) {n document.write(‘Full Text PDF‘);n }nelse if (fieldValue == ‘administrator’) { document.write(‘Full Text PDF‘); }nelse if (fieldValue == ‘ijipde’) { document.write(‘Full Text PDF‘); }n else { document.write(‘ ‘); }n [/if 992] [if 379 not_equal=””]n
Browse Figures
n
n[/if 379]n
References
n[if 1104 equals=””]n
- Akao, Y., 1990. QFD – Integrating Customer Requirements into Product Design, Productivity Press.
- Avak, B., 2007. variant management of modular product families in the market phase, u.o.: Master of Science, Georgia Institute of Technology.
- Can, K. C., 2008. Mass Customization, Modularization and Customer Order Decoupling Point: Building the Model of Relationships, s.l.: Linkoping University, Department of Management and Engineering Master’s Programme in Manufacturing Management.
- David Pickton, A. B., 2005. Chapter 17: Identifying target audiences and profiling target markets. 2.edition, pp.371- 398 red. u.o.: Integrated marketing communications.
- Erixon, G., 1998. Modular Function Deployment – A Method for Product Modularization, u.o.: The Royal Institute of Technology Dept. of Manufacturing Systems Assembly Systems Division.
- Gardiner, F., 1986. Design, Innovation, and Long Cycles in Economic Development. u.o.: London: Francis Printer, pp. 121-141.
- Henderson, R. a. K. C., 1990. Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms, u.o.: Administrative Science Quarterly, p.p. 9- 30.
- Ron Sanchez, J. T. M., 2000. Modularity and Economic Organization: Concepts, Theory, Observations, and Predictions, u.o.: Copenhagen Business School and University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign, pp. 12-15.
- Stone, R. B. W. K. L. C. R. H., 2000. A heuristic method for identifying modules for product architectures, u.o.: Design Studies, pp. 5-31. 41
Zamirowski E. J., O. K. N., 1999. Identifying Product Family Architecture Modularity Using Function and Variety Heuristics. 11th International
nn[/if 1104][if 1104 not_equal=””]n
- [foreach 1102]n t
- [if 1106 equals=””], [/if 1106][if 1106 not_equal=””],[/if 1106]
n[/foreach]
n[/if 1104]
nn
nn[if 1114 equals=”Yes”]n
n[/if 1114]
n
n
n
International Journal of Industrial and Product Design Engineering
n
n
n
n
n
n
| Volume | 01 | |
| [if 424 equals=”Regular Issue”]Issue[/if 424][if 424 equals=”Special Issue”]Special Issue[/if 424] [if 424 equals=”Conference”][/if 424] | 02 | |
| Received | February 17, 2024 | |
| Accepted | March 3, 2024 | |
| Published | April 10, 2024 |
n
n
n
n
n
nn function myFunction2() {n var x = document.getElementById(“browsefigure”);n if (x.style.display === “block”) {n x.style.display = “none”;n }n else { x.style.display = “Block”; }n }n document.querySelector(“.prevBtn”).addEventListener(“click”, () => {n changeSlides(-1);n });n document.querySelector(“.nextBtn”).addEventListener(“click”, () => {n changeSlides(1);n });n var slideIndex = 1;n showSlides(slideIndex);n function changeSlides(n) {n showSlides((slideIndex += n));n }n function currentSlide(n) {n showSlides((slideIndex = n));n }n function showSlides(n) {n var i;n var slides = document.getElementsByClassName(“Slide”);n var dots = document.getElementsByClassName(“Navdot”);n if (n > slides.length) { slideIndex = 1; }n if (n (item.style.display = “none”));n Array.from(dots).forEach(n item => (item.className = item.className.replace(” selected”, “”))n );n slides[slideIndex – 1].style.display = “block”;n dots[slideIndex – 1].className += ” selected”;n }n”}]