Psychosomatic and Psychodynamic Nature of Migraine and its Emerging Homeopathic Remedies.

[{“box”:0,”content”:”[if 992 equals=”Open Access”]

n

Open Access

n

[/if 992]n

n

Year : May 1, 2024 at 11:00 am | [if 1553 equals=””] Volume : [else] Volume :[/if 1553] | [if 424 equals=”Regular Issue”]Issue[/if 424][if 424 equals=”Special Issue”]Special Issue[/if 424] [if 424 equals=”Conference”][/if 424] : | Page : –

n

n

n

n

n

n

By

n

    n t

    [foreach 286]n

    n

    Neha Patel

  1. [/foreach]

    n

n

n[if 2099 not_equal=”Yes”]n

    [foreach 286] [if 1175 not_equal=””]n t

  1. Assistant Professor, Department of Homeopathy , Smt. C.M.P. Homeopathic Medical College. Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
  2. n[/if 1175][/foreach]

[/if 2099][if 2099 equals=”Yes”][/if 2099]nn

n

Abstract

nA unilateral headache with or without aura with throbbing or pulsating pain, associated with nausea or vomiting, and light and sound sensitivity is Migraine. The most common type of migraine is without aura (75% of cases). The triggers for Migraine are Sensory: Visual, Auditory, and Olfactory; Somatosensory-Touch; Physiological: Hunger, Physical exertion, and Change in sleep pattern, Linked to the Menstrual cycle; Dietary aspects: Chocolate, Alcoholic Beverages, Cheese, Processed Meat, Food Additives and Other food items; Environmental: Change of Weather. Several studies suggest stress as a trigger for migraine thus suggesting that Migraine can have a Psyche and Soma connection. This study attempts to demonstrate this connection by studying the negative life events that lead to the breakdown and development of Migraine, the emotions underlying these negative life events, and the internal conflicts that are generated. Remedies matching this would enhance our knowledge of the Psyche and Soma connection of the remedies. For instance, the significant life event that caused the breakdown and development of Migraine was fighting with loved ones (27%). The Emotions underlying this event were Disappointment in love (20%), which generated an internal conflict of Trust v/s Mistrust (27%). Major ego defenses were Somatisation, Suppression (46%), and Displacement (13%). The common emerging remedies were Natrium muriaticum (13%), Sepia officinalis (13%), and Onosmodium virginianum (13%).

n

n

n

Keywords: Triggers, Psychological conflict, Migraine, Homoeopathic remedies.

n[if 424 equals=”Regular Issue”][This article belongs to Research & Reviews : A Journal of Unani, Siddha and Homeopathy(rrjoush)]

n

[/if 424][if 424 equals=”Special Issue”][This article belongs to Special Issue under section in Research & Reviews : A Journal of Unani, Siddha and Homeopathy(rrjoush)][/if 424][if 424 equals=”Conference”]This article belongs to Conference [/if 424]

n

n

n

How to cite this article: Neha Patel.Psychosomatic and Psychodynamic Nature of Migraine and its Emerging Homeopathic Remedies..Research & Reviews : A Journal of Unani, Siddha and Homeopathy.May 1, 2024; ():-.

n

How to cite this URL: Neha Patel , Psychosomatic and Psychodynamic Nature of Migraine and its Emerging Homeopathic Remedies. rrjoush May 1, 2024 {cited May 1, 2024};:-. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/rrjoush/article=May 1, 2024/view=0

n


n[if 992 equals=”Open Access”] Full Text PDF Download[/if 992] nn

n[if 379 not_equal=””]n

Browse Figures

n

n

[foreach 379]n

n[/foreach]n

nn

n

n[/if 379]n

n

References

n[if 1104 equals=””]n

  1. Andreou AP, Edvinsson L. Mechanisms of migraine as a chronic evolutive condition. J Headache Pain. (2019) 20:117. 10.1186/s10194-019-1066-0
  2. Feigin VL, Nichols E, Alam T, Bannick MS, Beghi E, Blake N, et al.. Global, regional, and national burden of neurological disorders, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2016. Lancet Neurol. (2019) 18:459–80. 10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30499-X
  3. Goadsby PJ, Holland PR, Martins-Oliveira M, Hoffmann J, Schankin C, Akerman S (2017) Pathophysiology of migraine—a disorder of sensory processing. Physiol Rev 97(2):553–622
  4. Nappi G, Savoldi F. Headache. Diagnostic System and Taxonomic Criteria. London: John Libbey Eurotext; 1985.
  5. Maleki N, Becerra L, Borsook D. Migraine: maladaptive brain responses to stress. Headache. 2012;52(Suppl 2):102–6. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2012.02241.x.
  6. Borsook D, Maleki N, Becerra L, McEwen B. Understanding migraine through the lens of maladaptive stress responses: a model disease of allostatic load. Neuron. 2012;73(2):219–34. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.01.001.
  7. Biman K Ray, Neelanjana Paul, et.al. Prevalence, burden, and risk factors of migraine: A community-based study from Eastern India, Neurology India, 2017, Volume: 65, Issue: 6, Page: 1280-1288.
  8. Bartleson JD, Cutrer FM, Migraine update. Diagnosis and treatment, Minnesota Medicine, May 2010, 93 (5): 36–41. PMID 20572569.
  9. Antonaci F, Nappi G, Galli F, Manzoni GC, Calabresi P, Costa A. Migraine and psychiatric comorbidity: a review of clinical findings. J Headache Pain. (2011) 12:115–25. 10.1007/s10194-010-0282-4
  10. Borkum JM. Migraine triggers and oxidative stress: a narrative review and synthesis. Headache J Head Face Pain. (2016) 56:12–35. 10.1111/head.12725
  11. Jeong-Wook Park, Min Kyung Chu, et.al., Analysis of Trigger Factors in Episodic Migraineurs Using a Smartphone Headache Diary Applications, Plus one, February 22, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149577.
  12. The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition (beta version) Cephalalgia. 2013 Jul;33(9):629-808. doi: 10.1177/0333102413485658.
  13. Itamar S Santos, André R Brunoni, et.al., Negative life events and migraine: a cross-sectional analysis of the Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Adult Health (ELSA-Brasil) baseline data, BMC Public Health, 03 July 2014.
  14. Zandifar A, Asgari F, et.al, Reliability and validity of the migraine disability assessment scale among migraine and tension type headache in Iranian patients. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:978064. doi: 10.1155/2014/978064. Epub 2014 Jan 16. PMID: 24527462; PMCID: PMC3914354.
  15. Dhawale ML, Symposium volume, part I, 2nd Reprint edition, Mumbai, Dreams: M. L. Dhawale Memorial Trust, 2014
  16. Allais G, Chiarle G, Sinigaglia S, Airola G, Schiapparelli P, Benedetto C. Gender-related differences in migraine. Neurol Sci. 2020 Dec;41(Suppl 2):429-436. doi: 10.1007/s10072-020-04643-8. PMID: 32845494; PMCID: PMC7704513.
  17. Rama K. Yadav, DM and others, A Study of Triggers of Migraine in India, Pain Medicine, Volume 11, Issue 1, January 2010, Pages 44–47, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-4637.2009.00725.x
  18. DethlefsenT, Healing power of illness, Munich, Feb 1983, Part two: Chapter 6, Pg. Nos.157- 161.
  19. Cameron N, Rychlak J, Personality Development And Psychopathology – A Dynamic Approach, 1985, 2nd edition, Houghtan Miffin Company, Boston, Chapter 20, Pg No. 696.
  20. Bailey, P, Homoeopathic Psychology, the personality profiles of the major constitutional remedies. B. Jain Publisher. 2002.
  21. Coulter CR, Portraits of Homoeopathic Medicines, Quality medical publication, 2002.
  22. Tyler M, Homeopathic drug picture, 2nd edition, B Jain Publisher, New Delhi, 2004.
  23. Sankaran R, The soul of remedies, Mumbai, India, Homoeopathic medical publisher 1997
  24. Ren, J., Yao, Q., Tian, M. et al. Altered effective connectivity in migraine patients during emotional stimuli: a multi-frequency magnetoencephalography study. J Headache Pain 23, 6 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-021-01379-4

nn[/if 1104][if 1104 not_equal=””]n

    [foreach 1102]n t

  1. [if 1106 equals=””], [/if 1106][if 1106 not_equal=””],[/if 1106]
  2. n[/foreach]

n[/if 1104]

nn


nn[if 1114 equals=”Yes”]n

n[/if 1114]

n

n

[if 424 not_equal=””][else]Ahead of Print[/if 424] Subscription Review Article

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n[if 2146 equals=”Yes”]

[/if 2146][if 2146 not_equal=”Yes”]

[/if 2146]n

n

n

Volume
[if 424 equals=”Regular Issue”]Issue[/if 424][if 424 equals=”Special Issue”]Special Issue[/if 424] [if 424 equals=”Conference”][/if 424]
Received February 27, 2024
Accepted April 24, 2024
Published May 1, 2024

n

n

n

n

n

n

nn function myFunction2() {n var x = document.getElementById(“browsefigure”);n if (x.style.display === “block”) {n x.style.display = “none”;n }n else { x.style.display = “Block”; }n }n document.querySelector(“.prevBtn”).addEventListener(“click”, () => {n changeSlides(-1);n });n document.querySelector(“.nextBtn”).addEventListener(“click”, () => {n changeSlides(1);n });n var slideIndex = 1;n showSlides(slideIndex);n function changeSlides(n) {n showSlides((slideIndex += n));n }n function currentSlide(n) {n showSlides((slideIndex = n));n }n function showSlides(n) {n var i;n var slides = document.getElementsByClassName(“Slide”);n var dots = document.getElementsByClassName(“Navdot”);n if (n > slides.length) { slideIndex = 1; }n if (n (item.style.display = “none”));n Array.from(dots).forEach(n item => (item.className = item.className.replace(” selected”, “”))n );n slides[slideIndex – 1].style.display = “block”;n dots[slideIndex – 1].className += ” selected”;n }n”}]