Effect of Sustained and Selective attention paradigm in Recalling task: a Cross-Language Study

[{“box”:0,”content”:”[if 992 equals=”Open Access”]n

n

n

n

Open Access

nn

n

n[/if 992]n

n

Year : June 19, 2024 at 12:20 pm | [if 1553 equals=””] Volume : [else] Volume :[/if 1553] | [if 424 equals=”Regular Issue”]Issue[/if 424][if 424 equals=”Special Issue”]Special Issue[/if 424] [if 424 equals=”Conference”][/if 424] : | Page : –

n

n

n

n

n

n

By

n

[foreach 286]n

n

n

Muhammed Mudassir Makkacheentavida, Laya Raveendran, Abhishek BP

n

    n t

  • n

n

n[/foreach]

n

n[if 2099 not_equal=”Yes”]n

    [foreach 286] [if 1175 not_equal=””]n t

  1. Student, Student, Assistant Professor Department of Speech Language Pathology, All India Institute of Speech and Hearing, Department of Speech Language Pathology, All India Institute of Speech and Hearing, Department of Speech Language Pathology, All India Institute of Speech and Hearing Karnataka, Karnataka, Karnataka India, India, India
  2. n[/if 1175][/foreach]

n[/if 2099][if 2099 equals=”Yes”][/if 2099]n

n

Abstract

nAttention is the ability to channelize the resource towards the stimulus. Sustained attention refers to the process of holding attention for a considerable span of time while selective attention refers to the ability selectively channelize the attention to an selected set of stimulus governed by instructions. This task would require the selective inhibition of the irrelevant stimulus. The current study was carried out with the aim of investigating the sustained attention and selective attention on recall task in young neuro-typical Malayalam-English bilinguals. Two tasks based on recall was designed exclusively for the study. Task A, the first task required the participants to recall items from 12 item recall list while the second task designated as task B required the participants to selectively recall one of the two stimulus sets based on the instructions provided by the investigator. The stimulus was presented in L1and L2 of the participants and the performance in L1 and L2 across task A and B was also carried out. The data was initially checked for normality by using Shapiro-Wilk’s test and the data was non-parameteric. The median scores were more task B compared to Task A and the results was attributed to capacity limitation. In the same lines, median scores were more for L2 compared to L1 and this was attributed to exposure. Within group analysis was carried out using Wilcoxon’s signed rank test and the results showed that there was a significant difference between Task A and Task B, while the performance on L1-L2 was significant only for Task A and not for Task B.

n

n

n

Keywords: Task complexity, Inhibition, Selectivity, Concentration, Bilingualism

n[if 424 equals=”Regular Issue”][This article belongs to Research & Reviews: A Journal of Neuroscience(rrjons)]

n

[/if 424][if 424 equals=”Special Issue”][This article belongs to Special Issue under section in Research & Reviews: A Journal of Neuroscience(rrjons)][/if 424][if 424 equals=”Conference”]This article belongs to Conference [/if 424]

n

n

n

How to cite this article: Muhammed Mudassir Makkacheentavida, Laya Raveendran, Abhishek BP. Effect of Sustained and Selective attention paradigm in Recalling task: a Cross-Language Study. Research & Reviews: A Journal of Neuroscience. June 19, 2024; ():-.

n

How to cite this URL: Muhammed Mudassir Makkacheentavida, Laya Raveendran, Abhishek BP. Effect of Sustained and Selective attention paradigm in Recalling task: a Cross-Language Study. Research & Reviews: A Journal of Neuroscience. June 19, 2024; ():-. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/rrjons/article=June 19, 2024/view=0

nn[if 992 equals=”Open Access”] Full Text PDF Download[/if 992] n[if 992 not_equal=”Open Access”]

[/if 992]n[if 992 not_equal=”Open Access”]

n


n

n[/if 992]nn[if 379 not_equal=””]n

Browse Figures

n

n

[foreach 379]n

n[/foreach]n

n

n

n[/if 379]n

n

References

n[if 1104 equals=””]n

  1. Kellogg RT. Fundamentals of cognitive psychology. Sage Publications; 2015.
  2. Clifford T Morgan. Introduction to psychology. Second edition. NEW YORK: McGRAW HILL; 1961.
  3. Baars BJ, Gage NM. Cognition, brain, and consciousness: Introduction to cognitive neuroscience. Academic Press; 2010.
  4. Sohlberg MM, Mateer CA. Improving attention and managing attentional problems: Adapting rehabilitation techniques to adults with ADD. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2001 Jun;931(1):359-75.
  5. Roy RA. Auditory working memory: A comparison study in adults with normal hearing and mild to moderate hearing loss. Global Journal of Otolaryngology. 2018;13(3):1-4.
  6. Daneman M, Merikle PM. Working memory and language comprehension: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic bulletin & review. 1996 Dec;3(4):422-33.
  7. Baddeley A. Working memory and language: An overview. J Commun Disord. 2003;36(3):189–208.
  8. Archibald LMD, Joanisse MF. On the sensitivity and specificity of nonword repetition and sentence recall to language and memory impairments in children. 2009;
  9. Marian V, Neisser U. Language-dependent recall of autobiographical memories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 2000 Sep;129(3):361.
  10. Echemendia RJ, Meeuwisse W, McCrory P, Davis GA, Putukian M, Leddy J, et al. The sport concussion assessment tool 5th edition (SCAT5): background and rationale. Br J Sports Med. 2017;51(11):848–50.
  11. Gavett BE, Horwitz JE. Immediate list recall as a measure of short-term episodic memory: Insights from the serial position effect and item response theory. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology. 2012 Mar 1;27(2):125-35.
  12. Gavett BE, Poon SJ, Ozonoff AL, Jefferson AL, Nair AK, Green RC, Stern RA. Diagnostic utility of the NAB List Learning test in Alzheimer’s disease and amnestic mild cognitive impairment. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society. 2009 Jan;15(1):121-9.
  13. Grammaldo LG, Giampa T, Quarato PP, Picardi A, Mascia A, Sparano A, Meldolesi GN, Sebastiano F, Esposito V, Di Gennaro G. Lateralizing value of memory tests in drug‐resistant temporal lobe epilepsy. European journal of neurology. 2006 Apr;13(4):371-6.
  14. Bazarian JJ, Wong T, Harris M, Leahey N, Mookerjee S, Dombovy M. Epidemiology and predictors of post-concussive syndrome after minor head injury in an emergency population. Brain injury. 1999 Jan 1;13(3):173-89.
  15. Craik FI. On the transfer of information from temporary to permanent memory. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences. 1983 Aug 11;302(1110):341-59.
  16. Gunter TC, Jackson JL, Mulder G. Priming and aging: An electrophysiological investigation of N400 and recall. Brain and Language. 1998 Nov 1;65(2):333-55.
  17. Jacobs DM, Rakitin BC, Zubin NR, Ventura PR, Stern Y. Cognitive correlates of mnemonics usage and verbal recall memory in old age. Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology. 2001 Jan 1;14(1):15-22.
  18. Wetzel CD, Squire LR. Cued recall in anterograde amnesia. Brain Lang. 1982;15(1):70–81.
  19. Butters N, Granholm E, Salmon DP, Grant I, Wolfe J. Episodic and semantic memory: A comparison of amnesic and demented patients. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1987;9(5):479–97.
  20. Jones D. A family living with Alzheimer’s disease: The communicative challenges. Dementia. 2015;14(5):555–73.
  21. Neisser U. Cognitive psychology: Classic edition. Psychology press; 2014.
  22. Phelps J, Attaheri A, Bozic M. How bilingualism modulates selective attention in children. Scientific Reports. 2022 Apr 16;12(1):6381.
  23. Baharav E, Reiser C. Using telepractice in parent training in early autism. Telemedicine and e-Health. 2010 Jul 1;16(6):727-31.
  24. Boisvert M, Lang R, Andrianopoulos M, Boscardin ML. Telepractice in the assessment and treatment of individuals with autism spectrum disorders: A systematic review. Developmental neurorehabilitation. 2010 Dec 1;13(6):423-32.

nn[/if 1104][if 1104 not_equal=””]n

    [foreach 1102]n t

  1. [if 1106 equals=””], [/if 1106][if 1106 not_equal=””],[/if 1106]
  2. n[/foreach]

n[/if 1104]

nn


nn[if 1114 equals=”Yes”]n

n[/if 1114]

n

n

[if 424 not_equal=””][else]Ahead of Print[/if 424] Subscription Original Research

n

n

n

n

n

Research & Reviews: A Journal of Neuroscience

n

[if 344 not_equal=””]ISSN: 2277-6427[/if 344]

n

n

n

n

n

[if 2146 equals=”Yes”][/if 2146][if 2146 not_equal=”Yes”][/if 2146]n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n[if 1748 not_equal=””]

[else]

[/if 1748]n

n

n

Volume
[if 424 equals=”Regular Issue”]Issue[/if 424][if 424 equals=”Special Issue”]Special Issue[/if 424] [if 424 equals=”Conference”][/if 424]
Received April 2, 2024
Accepted June 13, 2024
Published June 19, 2024

n

n

n

n

n

n function myFunction2() {n var x = document.getElementById(“browsefigure”);n if (x.style.display === “block”) {n x.style.display = “none”;n }n else { x.style.display = “Block”; }n }n document.querySelector(“.prevBtn”).addEventListener(“click”, () => {n changeSlides(-1);n });n document.querySelector(“.nextBtn”).addEventListener(“click”, () => {n changeSlides(1);n });n var slideIndex = 1;n showSlides(slideIndex);n function changeSlides(n) {n showSlides((slideIndex += n));n }n function currentSlide(n) {n showSlides((slideIndex = n));n }n function showSlides(n) {n var i;n var slides = document.getElementsByClassName(“Slide”);n var dots = document.getElementsByClassName(“Navdot”);n if (n > slides.length) { slideIndex = 1; }n if (n (item.style.display = “none”));n Array.from(dots).forEach(n item => (item.className = item.className.replace(” selected”, “”))n );n slides[slideIndex – 1].style.display = “block”;n dots[slideIndex – 1].className += ” selected”;n }n”}]