Comparison of Knowledge Perceived by Final Year Dental Students for a Lesson on the Apical Barrier in the Premature Root by Clinical Case Demonstration as Compared to the Didactic Teaching Method

[{“box”:0,”content”:”[if 992 equals=”Open Access”]n

n

n

n

Open Access

nn

n

n[/if 992]n

n

Year : July 20, 2024 at 3:52 pm | [if 1553 equals=””] Volume :15 [else] Volume :15[/if 1553] | [if 424 equals=”Regular Issue”]Issue[/if 424][if 424 equals=”Special Issue”]Special Issue[/if 424] [if 424 equals=”Conference”][/if 424] : 02 | Page : 1-7

n

n

n

n

n

n

By

n

[foreach 286]n

n

n

Joshi Neelam, Joshi Raina, Sonali Kapoor, Deshpande Anshula N.,

n

    n t

  • n

n

n[/foreach]

n

n[if 2099 not_equal=”Yes”]n

    [foreach 286] [if 1175 not_equal=””]n t

  1. n[/if 1175][/foreach]

n[/if 2099][if 2099 equals=”Yes”][/if 2099]n

n

Abstract

nThe present dental education is using didactic teaching method, which is teacher-centered with minimal or no active participation from the students. Case-based learning (CBL) is defined as learning that is based upon description of a patient’s problems, analysis and interpretation of all the relevant data obtained from history, examination and investigations and planning for further management of patient. The goal of CBL is to prepare students for clinical practice, by linking theory using authentic clinical cases and its application using inquiry-based technique in learning. There is a scarcity of information about educational benefits and practicality of Clinical Case Based Demonstration in our local setup. Method: The present cross-sectional questionnaire study was conducted after getting ethical approval and written informed consent. The subjects were final year BDS students (40) and were divided into groups of 20 each (following odd-even method). The subjects were taught regarding apical barrier formation technique for premature tooth. For Group A – the didactic lecture was conducted and for Group B, demonstration was given in same manner. A questionnaire consisting of 15 questions was formulated. Analysis was done using SPSS software and Chi-square test. Results: All the subjects from both groups answered that Clinical Case Based Demonstration strengthens the link between theory and clinical practice. Conclusion: It can be concluded that incorporation of case-based learning in the undergraduate curriculum would enhance critical thinking skills and boost overall students’ confidence in diagnosis as well as performing the clinical treatment.

n

n

n

Keywords: Curriculum, Students, Learning, Knowledge, Feedback

n[if 424 equals=”Regular Issue”][This article belongs to Research & Reviews: A Journal of Dentistry(rrjod)]

n

[/if 424][if 424 equals=”Special Issue”][This article belongs to Special Issue under section in Research & Reviews: A Journal of Dentistry(rrjod)][/if 424][if 424 equals=”Conference”]This article belongs to Conference [/if 424]

n

n

n

How to cite this article: Joshi Neelam, Joshi Raina, Sonali Kapoor, Deshpande Anshula N.. Comparison of Knowledge Perceived by Final Year Dental Students for a Lesson on the Apical Barrier in the Premature Root by Clinical Case Demonstration as Compared to the Didactic Teaching Method. Research & Reviews: A Journal of Dentistry. May 25, 2024; 15(02):1-7.

n

How to cite this URL: Joshi Neelam, Joshi Raina, Sonali Kapoor, Deshpande Anshula N.. Comparison of Knowledge Perceived by Final Year Dental Students for a Lesson on the Apical Barrier in the Premature Root by Clinical Case Demonstration as Compared to the Didactic Teaching Method. Research & Reviews: A Journal of Dentistry. May 25, 2024; 15(02):1-7. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/rrjod/article=May 25, 2024/view=0

nn[if 992 equals=”Open Access”] Full Text PDF Download[/if 992] n

n[if 992 not_equal=’Open Access’] [/if 992]nn

n

nn[if 379 not_equal=””]n

Browse Figures

n

n

[foreach 379]n

n[/foreach]n

n

n

n[/if 379]n

n

References

n[if 1104 equals=””]n

  1. Kireeti AS, Reddy DS. Case-based learning (CBL), a better option to traditional teaching for undergraduate students in curriculum of Paediatrics. Asian Journal of Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2015 May 12;5(45).
  2. Bano N, Arshad F, Khan S, Safdar CA. Case based learning and traditional teaching strategies: Where lies the future?PAFMJ. 2015 Feb 28;65(1):118-24.
  3. Diwan JS, Sanghavi SJ, Shah CJ, Shah AM. Comparison of case-based learning and traditional lectures in physiology among first-year undergraduate medical students. Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol 2017;7(7):744-8.
  4. Zhang Y, Chen G, Fang X, Cao X, Yang C, Cai XY. Problem-based learning in oral and maxillofacial surgery education: the Shanghai hybrid. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2012 Jan 1;70(1):e7-11.
  5. Edrees HY, Ohlin J, Ahlquist M, Tessma MK, Zary N. Patient demonstration videos in predoctoral endodontic education: aspects perceived as beneficial by students. Journal of dental education. 2015 Aug;79(8):928-33.
  6. Richards PS, Inglehart MR. An interdisciplinary approach to case‐based teaching: does it create patient‐centered and culturally sensitive providers?. Journal of dental education. 2006 Mar;70(3):284-91.
  7. Ettinger RL, Beck JD, Kerber P, Scandrett FR. Dental students’ confidence in prosthodontics and attitudes toward the elderly. Journal of Dental Education. 1982 Sep;46(9):541-7.
  8. Packer ME, Scott BJ, Davis DM. An assessment of the influence of clinical demonstrations on the confidence of undergraduate dental students, when treating patients requiring removable partial dentures. European Journal of Dental Education. 1999 Aug;3(3):133-9.
  9. Alqahtani ND, Al-Jewair T, Al-Moammar K, Albarakati SF, ALkofide EA. Live demonstration versus procedural video: a comparison of two methods for teaching an orthodontic laboratory procedure. BMC medical education. 2015 Dec;15(1):1-4.
  10. Mirkarimi M, Kalati F, Moghadam AA. A comparison between video tape and live demonstration methods for teaching of fissure sealant placement procedures for dental students of Zahedan University of Medical Sciences in 2010-2011. J Dent Med. 2012 Jan 10;24(252):57.
  11. Mir MA, Marshall RJ, Evans RW, Hall R, Duthie HL. Comparison between videotape and personal teaching as methods of communicating clinical skills to medical students. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1984 Jul 7;289(6436):31-4.
  12. Deshpande A, Naik KS, Poonacha KS, Dave BH, Joshi NH, Mehta DH. Comparison of case-based learning and traditional learning style in final year BDS (bachelor of dental surgery) students in paediatric dentistry unit lesson.
  13. Singh A. Student performance and their perception of a patient-oriented problem-solving approach with audiovisual aids in teaching pathology: a comparison with traditional lectures. Advances in medical education and practice. 2010 Dec 20:9-15.
  14. Arias A, Scott R, Peters OA, McClain E, Gluskin AH. Educational outcomes of small‐group discussion versus traditional lecture format in dental students’ learning and skills acquisition. Journal of dental education. 2016 Apr;80(4):459-65.
  15. Heinrich C, Pennington RR, Kuiper R. Virtual case studies in the classroom improve student knowledge. Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 2012 Oct 1;8(8):e353-61.
  16. Bazyk S, Jeziorowski J. Videotaped versus live instruction in demonstrating evaluation skills to occupational therapy students. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy. 1989 Jul;43(7):465-8.
  17. Rosa QF, Barcelos TM, Kaizer MR, Montagner AF, Sarkis‐Onofre R, Masotti AS, Jardim PD, Pereira‐Cenci T, Oliveira EF, Cenci MS. Do educational methods affect students’ ability to remove artificial carious dentine? A randomised controlled trial. European Journal of Dental Education. 2013 Aug;17(3):154-8.
  18. Jeyapalan K, Mani UM, Christian J, Seenivasan MK, Natarajan P, Vaidhyanathan AK. Influence of Teaching Strategies and its Order of Exposure on Pre-Clinical Teeth Arrangement–A Pilot Study. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research: JCDR. 2016 Oct;10(10): ZC93.

 

nn[/if 1104][if 1104 not_equal=””]n

    [foreach 1102]n t

  1. [if 1106 equals=””], [/if 1106][if 1106 not_equal=””],[/if 1106]
  2. n[/foreach]

n[/if 1104]

nn


nn[if 1114 equals=”Yes”]n

n[/if 1114]

n

n

[if 424 not_equal=””]Regular Issue[else]Published[/if 424] Subscription Original Research

n

n

n

n

n

Research & Reviews: A Journal of Dentistry

n

[if 344 not_equal=””]ISSN: 2230-8008[/if 344]

n

n

n

n

n

[if 2146 equals=”Yes”][/if 2146][if 2146 not_equal=”Yes”][/if 2146]n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n[if 1748 not_equal=””]

[else]

[/if 1748]n

n

n

Volume 15
[if 424 equals=”Regular Issue”]Issue[/if 424][if 424 equals=”Special Issue”]Special Issue[/if 424] [if 424 equals=”Conference”][/if 424] 02
Received April 29, 2024
Accepted May 7, 2024
Published May 25, 2024

n

n

n

n

n

n nfunction myFunction2() {nvar x = document.getElementById(“browsefigure”);nif (x.style.display === “block”) {nx.style.display = “none”;n}nelse { x.style.display = “Block”; }n}ndocument.querySelector(“.prevBtn”).addEventListener(“click”, () => {nchangeSlides(-1);n});ndocument.querySelector(“.nextBtn”).addEventListener(“click”, () => {nchangeSlides(1);n});nvar slideIndex = 1;nshowSlides(slideIndex);nfunction changeSlides(n) {nshowSlides((slideIndex += n));n}nfunction currentSlide(n) {nshowSlides((slideIndex = n));n}nfunction showSlides(n) {nvar i;nvar slides = document.getElementsByClassName(“Slide”);nvar dots = document.getElementsByClassName(“Navdot”);nif (n > slides.length) { slideIndex = 1; }nif (n (item.style.display = “none”));nArray.from(dots).forEach(nitem => (item.className = item.className.replace(” selected”, “”))n);nslides[slideIndex – 1].style.display = “block”;ndots[slideIndex – 1].className += ” selected”;n}n”}]