B.M. Rajesh
Sakthi Ganesh M
Kavin S
- Assistant Professor, Department of IT, Dr.NGP Arts and Science College-Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India
- Student, Department of IT, Dr.NGP Arts and Science College-Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India
- Student, Department of IT, Dr.NGP Arts and Science College-Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India
Abstract
Artificial intelligence often referred to as the Fourth Industrial Revolution (IR 4.0), is poised to revolutionize not only our operational processes and social dynamics but also our understanding of ourselves. This article aims to establish a comprehensive definition of AI, scrutinize its impact on industrial, social, and economic landscapes in the 21st century, and subsequently propose a framework of principles governing AI bioethics. The first industrial revolution (IR 1.0) in the 18th century brought about significant societal changes without directly complicating human relationships. In stark contrast, the contemporary influence of advanced AI is fundamentally reshaping how we engage and communicate with one another. As this transformative challenge unfolds, it becomes imperative to formulate and adopt new principles of AI bioethics. These principles will serve as essential guidelines for AI technologies, ensuring responsible and ethical deployment in order to harness the full potential of this intelligence advancement for the benefit of humanity. The evolving landscape of AI prompts a revaluation of our ethical frameworks to navigate the intricate intersections of technology and society. By establishing a robust set of bioethical principles, we can proactively shape the trajectory of AI development, fostering a responsible and harmonious integration of this groundbreaking technology into our lives. In doing so, we strive to harness the transformative power of AI while safeguarding the ethical fabric of our interconnected world. Along with the speedy improvement of cybernetic generation in current years, AI has been visible nearly in all our lifestyles circles, and a number of that could now not be seemed as AI due to the fact it’s so not unusual place in each day lifestyles that we’re a good deal used to it which includes optical person popularity or the Siri (involves interpreting and recognizing speech interface) of statistics looking device on computer.
Keywords: Artificial intelligence, Bioethics, Principles of artificial intelligence, Speech Interface, Transformation, Ethical deployment.
[This article belongs to Omni Science: A Multi-disciplinary Journal(osmj)]
References
- Kaplan A, Haenlein M. Siri, Siri, in my hand: Who’s the fairest in the land? On the interpretations, illustrations, and implications of artificial intelligence. Business horizons. 2019 Jan 1;62(1):15–25.
- Russell SJ, Norvig P. Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall; 2009. 3. Roger C. Schank. Where’s the AI. AI Magazine. 1991;12:38.
- Cellan-Jones R. Stephen Hawking warns artificial intelligence could end mankind. BBC news. 2014 Dec 2;2(10):2014.
- Nilsson NJ. Principles of artificial intelligence. Springer Science & Business Media; 1982 May 1.
- Brewka G. Artificial intelligence—a modern approach by Stuart Russell and Peter Norvig, Prentice Hall. Series in Artificial Intelligence, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. The Knowledge Engineering Review. 1996 Mar;11(1):78–9.
- Kaplan J. Artificial intelligence: What everyone needs to knowR. Oxford University Press; 2016 Sep 1.
- Nilsson NJ. Artificial intelligence: a new synthesis. Morgan Kaufmann; 1998.
- Dina B. Microsoft develops AI to help cancer doctors find the right treatment. Bloomberg News. 2016 Sep.
- Roberts J. Thinking machines: The search for artificial intelligence. Distillations. 2016 Aug;2(2):14–23.
- Meera S. Are autonomous Robots your next surgeons. CNN Cable News Network. 2016.
Omni Science: A Multi-disciplinary Journal
| Volume | 14 |
| Issue | 01 |
| Received | November 9, 2023 |
| Accepted | February 18, 2024 |
| Published | February 28, 2024 |