Approach of Lean Manufacturing and Optimization in an Automobile Industry

Open Access

Year : 2021 | Volume : | Issue : 1 | Page : 16-28

    Ankita Sharma

  1. Abhijeet Sinha

  1. Student, Rajiv Gandhi Technical University, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India
  2. Assistant Professor, Rajiv Gandhi Technical University, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India


Lean manufacturing and company integration in Yamaha Faridabad Industry. To provide a sharp and distinct understanding and embodiment of how Faridabad Yamaha company in the machining industry work with improvements in general and lean in particular. An extended definition of company integration, and how it plays a critical role in a company’s performance with regard to its internal interaction. Collecting data was done by conducting case studies of Faridabad factory. The data was then compiled and categorized in order to provide a summarized comprehensible representation of all data. The result, in addition to achieving the purpose above, is two Management Tools that are direct descendants of their respective topics, aiming to solve problems related to them.

Keywords: Lean production, lean manufacturing, Yamaha, improvement, people and partners, lean problem solving

[This article belongs to NOLEGEIN Journal of Operations Research & Management(njorm)]

How to cite this article: Ankita Sharma, Abhijeet Sinha Approach of Lean Manufacturing and Optimization in an Automobile Industry njorm 2021; 4:16-28
How to cite this URL: Ankita Sharma, Abhijeet Sinha Approach of Lean Manufacturing and Optimization in an Automobile Industry njorm 2021 {cited 2021 Apr 16};4:16-28. Available from:

Full Text PDF Download

Browse Figures


1. Ab Talib MS, Abdul Hamid ABA, Thoo AC. Critical success factors of supply chain management: a literature survey and Pareto analysis. EuroMed J Bus. 2015;10(2):234–63. doi: 10.1108/EMJB-09–2014–0028.
2. Aghazadeh S-M, Hafeznezami S, Najjar L, Huq Z. The influence of work-cells and facility layout on the manufacturing efficiency. J Facil Manag. 2011;9(3):213–24. doi: 10.1108/14725961111148117.
3. Alfa Laval. Alfa laval: about us [online] [Accessed. Vol. 11(09); 2015]; 2015. Available from:
4. Anon. University of Michigan, Michigan engineering [online] [Accessed. Vol. 25(10); 2015]; 2015. Available from:
5. Anon, n.d. Lean Enterprise Institute [online] [Accessed. Vol. 17(12); 2015]. Available from:
6. Anon, n.d. Six Sigma material [online] [Accessed. Vol. 17(12); 2015]. Available from:
7. Aramburu N, Sáenz J, Blanco E, C. Structural capital, innovation capability, and company performance in technology-based Colombian firms [online] [Använd; February 2016]; 2014. Available from: ad93–322e12f24822%40sessionmgr4002&vid=1&hid=4205.
8. Berglund F, 2015. Operations development manager, region US, OD US [interview] (26(10). 2015).
9. Berk E, Özgür Toy A. Quality control chart design under Jidoka [online]; 2009. Available from: N=&volume=56&issue=5&date=20090801&spage=465&pages=46577&title=Naval+Research+ Logistics&atitle=Quality+control+chart+design+under+jidoka&aulast=Berk%2c+E.&id=DOI%3 a10.10 [Använd February 2016].
10. Bhamu J, Sangwan KS. Lean manufacturing: literature review and research issues. Int J Oper Prod Manag. 2014;34(7):876–940.
11. Bhasin S. An appropriate change strategy for lean success. Manag Decis. 2012;50(3):439–58. doi: 10.1108/00251741211216223.
12. Business dictionary. Struct Cap. 2016 [Använd; February 2016].
13. Pegels C, C. The Toyota production system-Lessons for American management [online] [Använd; February 2016]; 1984. Available from: 10.1108/eb054703.
14. Carlsson D, Fröberg P, 2015. Photo. u.o. Cox un, CR, Ullmer JM. Lean Manufacturing: an analysis of process improvement techniques [online] [Använd; February 2016]; 2015. Available from:–3f7d-4cbb-adea- 2cf8138efc00%40sessionmgr115&vid=1&hid=117.
15. Chapman CD. Clean house with lean. Qual Prog. 2005;5S.
16. Crumpton MA. The Bottom Line: the importance of visibility [online] [Använd; February 2016]; 2010. Available from:
17. Darawsheh W. Reflexivity in research: promoting rigour, reliability and validity in qualitative research [online]. International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation. 2014;21(12):560–8. doi: 10.12968/ijtr.2014.21.12.560 [Använd; February 2016].
18. De-Arbulo-Lopez PR, Fortuny-Santos J, Cuatrecasas-Arbos L. Lean manufacturing: costing the value stream. Ind Manag Data Syst, 647–668(5). 2013:113.
19. Emery CR. A cause-effect-cause model for sustaining cross-functional integration. Business Process Mgmt Journal. 2009;15(1):93–108. doi: 10.1108/14637150910931488.
20. Emiliani ML, Stec DJ. Using value-stream maps to improve leadership. Leadership & Org Development J. 2004;25(8):622–45. doi: 10.1108/01437730410564979.
21. Ericsson J, 1997. Störningsanalys av tillverknings system: ett viktigt verktyg inom. Lean production. 1st red. Lund: lunds Universitet.
22. Erlach K. Value stream design-the way towards a lean factory. 3rd ed. Stuttgart: Springer Verlag; 2013.
23. Fisher M. Strengthening the empirical base of operations management. Manuf Serv Oper Manag. 2007;9(4):368–82. doi: 10.1287/msom.1070.0168.
24. Golicic SL, Davis DF, McCarthy TM. A balanced approach to research in supply chain management. Supply Chain Manag Research Methodologies in. 2005:15–30.

Regular Issue Open Access Article
Volume 4
Issue 1
Received March 23, 2021
Accepted April 2, 2021
Published April 16, 2021