Open Access
![](http://storage.googleapis.com/journals-stmjournals-com-wp-media-to-gcp-offload/2022/10/vector.jpg)
Jotesh Gupta,
![](http://storage.googleapis.com/journals-stmjournals-com-wp-media-to-gcp-offload/2022/10/vector.jpg)
Vanita Aggarwal,
- Ph.D Research Scholar Civil Engineering Department, M.M Engineering College, MM(DU), Mullana, Ambala Haryana India
- Professor Civil Engineering Department, M.M Engineering College, MM(DU), Mullana, Ambala Haryana India
Abstract
Production of geopolymer composites, an inventive and environmentally friendly substitute for regular Portland cement concrete, involves the polymerization of several industrial waste materials, including fly ash, powdered granulated blast furnace slag, silica fume, and rice husk ash, using solutions that are very alkaline. Because this technique removes the requirement for calcination, which is a significant contributor of CO2 emissions during the manufacturing of OPC, GPC is more ecologically friendly. Alkaline activator solutions and alumino-silicate source materials are the essential components that start the geo-polymerization process and provide a binder that can bind aggregates. GPC offers advantages like higher compressive strength, improved durability, and resistance to chemical attacks compared to OPC concrete. The compressive strength results showed that for M40 grade under normal curing, the nominal OPC mix achieved48.94 MPa at 28 days, while 100% replacements with GGBS, silica fume, fly ash, and rice husk ash achieved lower strengths of 18.11, 16.86, 10.23, and 8.03 MPa, respectively. Under heat curing, these values increased, with GGBS exhibiting 21.01 MPa. For M50 grade, the nominal OPC mix attained 54.14 MPa under normal curing and 59.27 MPa under heat curing. The 100% GGBS, silica fume, fly ash, and rice husk ash mixes achieved lower strengths under both curing regimes. The maximum 28-day strength of 41.3 MPa under normal curing and 45.54 MPa under heat curing was reached by the GGBS mix when 40% additional materials were added to 60% OPC for M40. This was followed by mixes including silica fume, fly ash, and rice husk ash. Comparable patterns for M50 grade were noted. Ultimately, geopolymer concrete is a viable, environmentally friendly substitute that has exceptional mechanical qualities like as resilience to chemicals, strength, and durability, which enable it to be used in a variety of settings.
Keywords: Geopolymer Composites; Supplementary Cementitious Ingredients; Geopolymer Properties, Alkaline Activation Solution; CO2 emission.
References
- Sumesh KR, Palanisamy S, Khan T, Ajithram A, Ahmed OS. Mechanical, Morphological and Wear Resistance of Natural Fiber/Glass Fiber-based Polymer Composites. BioResources. 2024 Apr 11;19(2):3271-89.
- Nair AB, Sivasubramanian P, Balakrishnan P, Ajith Kumar KA, Sreekala MS. Environmental effects, biodegradation, and life cycle analysis of fully biodegradable “green” composites. Polymer composites. 2013 Nov 11:515-68.
- Palaniappan M, Palanisamy S, Khan R, H. Alrasheedi N, Tadepalli S, Murugesan TM, Santulli C. Synthesis and suitability characterization of microcrystalline cellulose from Citrus x sinensis sweet orange peel fruit waste-based biomass for polymer composite applications. Journal of Polymer Research. 2024 Apr;31(4):105
- Palaniappan M, Palanisamy S, Murugesan TM, Alrasheedi NH, Ataya S, Tadepalli S, Elfar AA. Novel Ficus retusa L. aerial root fiber: a sustainable alternative for synthetic fibres in polymer composites reinforcement. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery. 2024 Mar 19:1-7.
- Mylsamy B, Shanmugam SK, Aruchamy K, Palanisamy S, Nagarajan R, Ayrilmis N. A review on natural fiber composites: Polymer matrices, fiber surface treatments, fabrication methods, properties, and applications. Polymer Engineering & Science. 2024 Mar 19.
- Siddiraju S. STRENGTH PROPERTIES ON FLY ASH BASED GEO POLYMER CONCRETE WITH ADMIXTURES.
- Adak D, Mandal S. Strength and Durability Performance of Fly Ash–Based Process-Modified Geopolymer Concrete. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering. 2019 Sep 1, volume-31, issue-9:04019174.
- Alzeebaree, R., Çevik, A., Nematollahi, B., Sanjayan, J., Mohammedameen, A. and Gülşan, M.E., Mechanical properties and durability of unconfined and confined geopolymer concrete with fiber reinforced polymers exposed to sulfuric acid. Construction and Building Materials, 2019, 215, pp.1015-1032.
- Aslani, F. and Asif, Z., Properties of ambient-cured normal and heavy weight geopolymer concrete exposed to high temperatures. Materials, 2019, 12(5), p.740.
- Priya & Nirmal Kumar K., A Review on the Durability Properties of Geopolymer Concrete with the Combination of GGBS and Fly Ash, International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology (IJIRSET), 2017, Vol. 6, Issue 10, pp 20630-20634.
- Bendapudi, Sarath &Ramesh, K. &Poluraju, P. An experimental investigation on flexural behavior of GGBS and Metakaolin based Geopolymer concrete. ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 2017, 12. 2052-2062.
- Bhandari P. Experimental Investigation on Corrugated Interlocking Paving Blocks (CIPB) for strength and durability study. Int. J. Mod. Trends Eng. Res. 2016;3:86-90.
- Bhargav MV, Kumar BS. Strength and Durability Study of Geopolymer Concrete Incorporating Metakaolin and Ggbs with 10m Alkali Activator Solution. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology. 2017,Vol.- 8, Issue- 1.
- S. Maneesh kumar, G. Manimaran, S. Prasanth, An Experimental Investigation on GGBS and Flyash Based Geopolymer Concrete with Replacement of Sand by Quarry Dust, International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications, 2015, ISSN: 2248- 9622, Volume. 5, Issue 5, (Part -1) pp.91-95.
- Du Haiyan, Yang Lina, Gao Wanqi,Liu Jiachen, Effects of characteristics of fly ash on the properties of geopolymer, Transactions of Tianjin University, Springer, 2016, Volume 22, Issue 3, pp 261–267.
- Gupta J, Aggarwal V. Geopolymer Concrete: A Sustainable Development and Its Field Applications. In Recent Advances in Sustainable Environment: Select Proceedings of RAiSE, 2022, pp.237-247.
- Hake, Sandeep & Urphate, S & Awasarmal, P & Damgir, R. Investigation on alkali activated fly ash based geopolymer concrete. Global Journal of Civil Engineering. 2019, 12-15. Doi- 10.37516/global.j.civ.eng.2019.0077.
- Mahmoud, M.H. and Bassuoni, M.T. Performance of Concrete with Alkali-Activated Materials and Nano-silica in Acidic Environments. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 2016, 31(3), p.04019009.20033. AIP
- Sathia R, Babu KG, Santhanam M. Durability study of low calcium flyash geopolymer concrete. Proceedings of the 3rd ACF International Conference-ACF/VCA 2008.
- Malhotra VM. Introduction: sustainable development and concrete technology. Concrete International. 2002 Jul 1;24(7).
- Vijaysankar PM, Anuradha R, Sreevidya V, Venkatasubramani R. Durability studies of geopolymer concrete solid blocks. International Journal of Advanced Scientific and Technical Research. 2013, volume-2, issue- 3, p272-278.
- Xie, J., Wang, J., Rao, R., Wang, C. and Fang, C. Effects of combined usage of GGBS and fly ash on workability and mechanical properties of alkali activated geopolymer concrete with recycled aggregate. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2019, 164, pp. 179-190.
- H. Mugahed Amran, Rayed Alyousef, Hisham Alabduljabbar, Mohamed El-Zeadani. Clean production and properties of geo-polymer concrete: A review, Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020.
![](http://storage.googleapis.com/journals-stmjournals-com-wp-media-to-gcp-offload/2022/12/af025f00-jopc.jpg)
Journal of Polymer and Composites
Volume | |
Received | May 16, 2024 |
Accepted | June 16, 2024 |
Published | July 11, 2024 |