Dynamic Performance Enhancement of Polymer Composites through Metaheuristic machinining optimization

Open Access

Year : 2024 | Volume : | : | Page : –

Jai Rajesh.P



  1. Research Scholar Department of Mechatronics, Bharath Institute of Higher Education and Research, Selaiyur, Chennai Tamil Nadu India
  2. Professor Department of Mechanical, Bharath Institute of Higher Education and Research, Selaiyur Tamil Nadu India
  3. Associate Professor Department of Mechanical, Bharath Institute of Higher Education and Research, Selaiyur, Chennai Tamil Nadu India


This work aims to provide an optimization of meta-heuristic algorithms in order to improve the dynamic behavior of composite materials utilized in various practical engineering tasks. Based on the Comprehensive literature review it has been observed that composite sandwich panels with PVC foam cores accomplished mechanical characteristics superior than those ones that were produced on PU foam core mainly in flexural, compression, and impact tests Thus the study establishes the basis of the current work on the best possible machining parameters for PVC foam so as to boost its mechanical properties. The results of testing PVC foam using mechanical tests showed higher values for flexural strength, compression strength, and impact resistance of PVC over that of PU foams. On the other hand, the random forest regression had the best fitting models for machining parameters, with its unbiased mean squared error (MSE) and the highest R2 (coefficient of determination) of all the algorithms. Along with the meta heuristic algorithms like Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), Firefly Algorithm, Cuckoo Search, Grey Wolf Optimizer (GWO), Multi Objective Teaching Learning based Optimization Algorithm (MOTLBO), and Salp Swarm Algorithm that were used to optimize machining parameters, the GWO (Grey Wolf Optimizer) method appeared to have the best results. The uniqueness of this research is due to the advent of its holistic strategy which integrate data obtained from the earlier works and experimental study to arrive at the machining parameters for PVC foam. Through the application of the advanced regression analysis methods and meta heuristic optimization algorithms, the study achieves a great impact on the predictive effectiveness and efficiency of the composite materials dynamics optimization, resulting in a more effective improvement of the dynamic performance. The main aim of this research work is the promotion of composite material design techniques by offering practical guidelines and approaches for dynamic performance superiority which also enable the manufacturing of the lightest and sturdy with the highest performance engineering materials.

Keywords: Composite materials, Meta heuristic algorithms, PVC foam, Polyurethane foam, Machining parameters, Random forest, Grey Wolf Optimizer, Optimization, Engineering materials

How to cite this article: Jai Rajesh.P, V.Balambica, M.Achudhan. Dynamic Performance Enhancement of Polymer Composites through Metaheuristic machinining optimization. Journal of Polymer and Composites. 2024; ():-.
How to cite this URL: Jai Rajesh.P, V.Balambica, M.Achudhan. Dynamic Performance Enhancement of Polymer Composites through Metaheuristic machinining optimization. Journal of Polymer and Composites. 2024; ():-. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/jopc/article=2024/view=0

Full Text PDF Download


  1. Taghizadeh SA, Farrokhabadi A, Liaghat G, Pedram E, Malekinejad H, Mohammadi SF, Ahmadi H. Characterization of compressive behavior of PVC foam infilled composite sandwich panels with different corrugated core shapes. Thin-Walled Structures. 2019 Feb 1;135:160-72.
  2. Samali B, Nemati S, Sharafi P, Tahmoorian F, Sanati F. Structural performance of polyurethane foam-filled building composite panels: a state-of-the-art. Journal of Composites Science. 2019 Apr 10;3(2):40.
  3. Osa-Uwagboe N, Silberschimdt VV, Aremi A, Demirci E. Mechanical behaviour of fabric-reinforced plastic sandwich structures: A state-of-the-art review. Journal of Sandwich Structures & Materials. 2023 Jun;25(5):591-622.
  4. He J, Xie D, Xue Q, Zhan Y. Seawater effects on static loads and interlayer cracking performance for polyvinyl chloride foam-cored sandwich composites. Advances in Mechanical Engineering. 2018 Nov;10(11):1687814018807342.
  5. Garrido M, Correia JR, Branco FA, Keller T. Creep behaviour of sandwich panels with rigid polyurethane foam core and glass-fibre reinforced polymer faces: Experimental tests and analytical modelling. Journal of Composite Materials. 2014 Aug;48(18):2237-49.
  6. Ozdemir O, Karakuzu R, Al-Shamary AK. Core-thickness effect on the impact response of sandwich composites with poly (vinyl chloride) and poly (ethylene terephthalate) foam cores. Journal of Composite Materials. 2015 May;49(11):1315-29.
  7. Sharafi P, Nemati S, Samali B, Bahmani A, Khakpour S, Aliabadizadeh Y. Flexural and shear performance of an innovative foam-filled sandwich panel with 3-D high density polyethylene skins. Engineering Solid Mechanics. 2018:113-28.
  8. Kassab R. Experimental study and development of sustainable sandwich panels (Doctoral dissertation).
  9. Kumar, M. Vijay, and Bhimasen Soragaon. “Fabrication and evaluation of multilayered polyurethane foam core sandwich panels for static flexural stiffness.” Procedia Engineering 97 (2014): 1227-1236.
  10. Yüksel E, Güllü A, Özkaynak H, Soydan C, Khajehdehi A, Şenol E, Saghayesh AM, Saruhan H. Experimental investigation and pseudoelastic truss model for in-plane behavior of corrugated sandwich panels with polyurethane foam core. InStructures 2021 Feb 1 (Vol. 29, pp. 823-842). Elsevier.
  11. BAŞTÜRK B. Effect of Fiber Orientation on the Mechanical Properties of Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer (GFRP)/PVC Sandwich Composites. Karaelmas Fen ve Mühendislik Dergisi. 2023 Jun 6;13(1):52-61.
  12. Manujesh BJ, Rao V, Aan MS. Moisture absorption and mechanical degradation studies of polyurethane foam cored E-glass-reinforced vinyl-ester sandwich composites. Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites. 2014 Mar;33(5):479-92.
  13. Zniker H, Ouaki B, Bouzakraoui S, EbnTouhami M, Mezouara H. Energy absorption and damage characterization of GFRP laminated and PVC-foam sandwich composites under repeated impacts with reduced energies and quasi-static indentation. Case studies in construction materials. 2022 Jun 1;16:e00844.
  14. Sharafi P, Nemati S, Samali B, Mousavi A, Khakpour S, Aliabadizadeh Y. Edgewise and flatwise compressive behaviour of foam-filled sandwich panels with 3-D high density polyethylene skins. Engineering Solid Mechanics. 2018;6(3):285-98.
  15. Miyase A, Wang SS. Test method development and determination of three-dimensional strength and failure modes of polyvinyl chloride structural foams. Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology. 2017 Jul 1;139(3):031006.
  16. Hassanpour Roudbeneh F, Liaghat G, Sabouri H, Hadavinia H. Experimental investigation of quasistatic penetration tests on honeycomb sandwich panels filled with polymer foam. Mechanics of Advanced Materials and Structures. 2020 Nov 2;27(21):1803-15.
  17. Demircioğlu TK, Balıkoğlu F, İnal O, Arslan N, Ay İ, Ataş A. Experimental investigation on low-velocity impact response of wood skinned sandwich composites with different core configurations. Materials Today Communications. 2018 Dec 1;17:31-9.
  18. Zhang P, Cheng Y, Liu J, Li Y, Zhang C, Hou H, Wang C. Experimental study on the dynamic response of foam-filled corrugated core sandwich panels subjected to air blast loading. Composites Part B: Engineering. 2016 Nov 15;105:67-81.
  19. Volz JS, Gliha B. Polyurethane foam infill for fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) bridge deck panels. Missouri University of Science and Technology. Center for Transportation Infrastructure and Safety; 2014 May 1.

20. Toygar ME, Tee KF, Maleki FK, Balaban AC. Experimental, analytical and numerical study of mechanical properties and fracture energy for composite sandwich beams. Journal of Sandwich Structures & Materials. 2019 Mar;21(3):1167-89.

Ahead of Print Open Access Original Research
Received March 31, 2024
Accepted April 16, 2024
Published May 16, 2024

function myFunction2() {
var x = document.getElementById(“browsefigure”);
if (x.style.display === “block”) {
x.style.display = “none”;
else { x.style.display = “Block”; }
document.querySelector(“.prevBtn”).addEventListener(“click”, () => {
document.querySelector(“.nextBtn”).addEventListener(“click”, () => {
var slideIndex = 1;
function changeSlides(n) {
showSlides((slideIndex += n));
function currentSlide(n) {
showSlides((slideIndex = n));
function showSlides(n) {
var i;
var slides = document.getElementsByClassName(“Slide”);
var dots = document.getElementsByClassName(“Navdot”);
if (n > slides.length) { slideIndex = 1; }
if (n (item.style.display = “none”));
item => (item.className = item.className.replace(” selected”, “”))
slides[slideIndex – 1].style.display = “block”;
dots[slideIndex – 1].className += ” selected”;