A Study of The Performance of surface modified NACA 2416 Airfoils at various Angles of Attach at Re80000

[{“box”:0,”content”:”[if 992 equals=”Open Access”]n

n

n

n

Open Access

nn

n

n[/if 992]n

n

Year : May 13, 2024 at 11:17 am | [if 1553 equals=””] Volume : [else] Volume :[/if 1553] | [if 424 equals=”Regular Issue”]Issue[/if 424][if 424 equals=”Special Issue”]Special Issue[/if 424] [if 424 equals=”Conference”][/if 424] : | Page : –

n

n

n

n

n

n

By

n

[foreach 286]n

n

n

Abhishek T K, H V Srikanth, Ramvishal, Venugopal M M

n

    n t

  • n

n

n[/foreach]

n

n[if 2099 not_equal=”Yes”]n

    [foreach 286] [if 1175 not_equal=””]n t

  1. , Department of Aeronautical engineering, Nitte Meenakshi Institute of Technology, Department of Aeronautical engineering, Nitte Meenakshi Institute of Technology, Department of Aeronautical engineering, Nitte Meenakshi Institute of Technology, Department of Aeronautical engineering, Nitte Meenakshi Institute of Technology, Karnataka, Karnataka, Karnataka, Karnataka, India, India, India, India
  2. n[/if 1175][/foreach]

n[/if 2099][if 2099 equals=”Yes”][/if 2099]n

n

Abstract

nThis study delves into the aerodynamic effects and characteristics of surface-modified NACA 2416 airfoils, placing a greater emphasis on the aerodynamic efficiency of a two-dimensional surface-modified NACA 2416 airfoil under subsonic flow conditions at Re=80000 and various angles of attack (AOAs). The surface-modified airfoils were crafted using CATIA V5, and simulations were conducted in ANSYS Fluent for angles of attack ranging from 0° to 12°.The CFD results encompass a broad spectrum of surface modifications, including cuts of 20%, 40%, and 80% on the bottom surface. The analysis covers key aerodynamic characteristics such as the Coefficient of Lift, Coefficient of Drag, and Pressure Distribution. The airfoil featuring an 80% chord cut, positioned near the trailing edge, exhibits a gradual flow acceleration, leading to increased pressure on the lower surface and consequently, a maximum lift coefficient. Flow separation is identified within the range of 0° to 12° AOA for all three airfoils. Notably, airfoils with an 80% chord cut experience earlier stall compared to the other two airfoils.

n

n

n

Keywords: NACA, AOA, Coefficient of lift, Coefficient of drag, Pressure distribution, Flow analysis, ANSYS Fluent, Reynold’s number (Re).

n[if 424 equals=”Regular Issue”][This article belongs to Journal of Polymer and Composites(jopc)]

n

[/if 424][if 424 equals=”Special Issue”][This article belongs to Special Issue under section in Journal of Polymer and Composites(jopc)][/if 424][if 424 equals=”Conference”]This article belongs to Conference [/if 424]

n

n

n

How to cite this article: Abhishek T K, H V Srikanth, Ramvishal, Venugopal M M. A Study of The Performance of surface modified NACA 2416 Airfoils at various Angles of Attach at Re80000. Journal of Polymer and Composites. May 13, 2024; ():-.

n

How to cite this URL: Abhishek T K, H V Srikanth, Ramvishal, Venugopal M M. A Study of The Performance of surface modified NACA 2416 Airfoils at various Angles of Attach at Re80000. Journal of Polymer and Composites. May 13, 2024; ():-. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/jopc/article=May 13, 2024/view=0

nn


nn[if 992 equals=”Open Access”] Full Text PDF Download[/if 992]

[if 379 not_equal=””]n

Browse Figures

n

n

[foreach 379]n

n[/foreach]n

nn

n

n[/if 379]n

n

References

n[if 1104 equals=””]n

[1] O. John E. Matsson, Connor McCain, John Voth, Oral Roberts University, “Aerodynamic Performance of the NACA 2412 Airfoil at Low Reynolds Number “Connor McCain on 25 August 2017

[2] A. Ram Krishna Prasad, G. Daison, T. AmuthanSamsudeen, T. Arvind Raj and V. Sri Ram. He is sincerely thanks to Prof. B. Kanickai Raj, Mr. Ravi Shankar, Mr. G. Sakthivel, JJ College of Engineering and Technology “Flow Simulation on New Airfoils Design”IJSRD – International Journal for Scientific Research & Development| Vol. 4, Issue 12, 2017 | ISSN (online): 2321-0613

[3] Arvind Prabhakar* and Ayush Ohri, Manipal Institute of Technology.“CFD Analysis on MAV NACA 2412 Wing in High Lift Take-Off Configuration for Enhanced Lift Generation “DOI: 10.4172/2168-9792.1000125.

 

[4] Scott Douglas Lindsay, Paul Walsh, Ryerson University, Toronto, Canada. “Experimental Investigation of Spoiler Deployment on Wing Stall “Open Journal of Fluid Dynamics, 2018, 8, 308-320.

[5] SHIVANANDA SARKAR, SHAHEEN BEG MUGHAL. ITM University, Gwalior“CFD ANALYSIS OF EFFECT OF FLOW OVER NACA 2412 AIRFOIL THROUGH THE SHEAR STRESSTRANSPORT TURBULENCE MODEL”ISSN: 2320-2092, Volume- 5, Issue-7, Jul.-2017.

[6] Er. Shivam Saxena, Mr. Rahul Kumar Department of Aeronautical Engineering, Babu Banarsi Das National Institute of Technology and Management, Lucknow, India “Design of NACA 2412 and its Analysis at Different Angle of Attacks, Reynolds Numbers, and a wind tunnel test”ISSN 2091-2730, Volume 3, Issue 2,  March-April, 2015.

[7] Sonia Chalia, Manish Kumar Bharti & Assistant professor, Department of Aerospace Engineering, Amity University Haryana Gurgaon, India, “Design and Analysis of Vortex Generator and Dimple over an Airfoil Surface to Improve Aircraft Performance” Volume – 3, Issue – 4, August – 2017, ISSN: 2454-2377.

[8] Yogesh Thawrani and Ajith Kumar S Department of Mechanical Engineering, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Amritapuri, India “Influence of surface temperature on the flow characteristics of NACA 2412 airfoil” Volume 119 No. 12 2018, 71-75 ISSN: 1314-3395.

[9] Md. Tariqul Islamb, Amit M. E. Arefina, M. H. Masudc), Monjur Mourshedd Department of Mechanical Engineering, Rajshahi University of Engineering and Technology, Rajshahi, Bangladesh “The Effect of Reynolds Number on the Performance of a Modified NACA 2412 Airfoil” doi: 10.1063/1.5044325.

nn[/if 1104][if 1104 not_equal=””]n

    [foreach 1102]n t

  1. [if 1106 equals=””], [/if 1106][if 1106 not_equal=””],[/if 1106]
  2. n[/foreach]

n[/if 1104]

nn


nn[if 1114 equals=”Yes”]n

n[/if 1114]

n

n

[if 424 not_equal=””][else]Ahead of Print[/if 424] Open Access Original Research

n

n

n

n

n

Journal of Polymer and Composites

n

[if 344 not_equal=””]ISSN: 2321–2810[/if 344]

n

n

n

n

n

[if 2146 equals=”Yes”][/if 2146][if 2146 not_equal=”Yes”][/if 2146]n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n[if 1748 not_equal=””]

[else]

[/if 1748]n

n

n

Volume
[if 424 equals=”Regular Issue”]Issue[/if 424][if 424 equals=”Special Issue”]Special Issue[/if 424] [if 424 equals=”Conference”][/if 424]
Received November 27, 2023
Accepted February 19, 2024
Published May 13, 2024

n

n

n

n

n

n function myFunction2() {n var x = document.getElementById(“browsefigure”);n if (x.style.display === “block”) {n x.style.display = “none”;n }n else { x.style.display = “Block”; }n }n document.querySelector(“.prevBtn”).addEventListener(“click”, () => {n changeSlides(-1);n });n document.querySelector(“.nextBtn”).addEventListener(“click”, () => {n changeSlides(1);n });n var slideIndex = 1;n showSlides(slideIndex);n function changeSlides(n) {n showSlides((slideIndex += n));n }n function currentSlide(n) {n showSlides((slideIndex = n));n }n function showSlides(n) {n var i;n var slides = document.getElementsByClassName(“Slide”);n var dots = document.getElementsByClassName(“Navdot”);n if (n > slides.length) { slideIndex = 1; }n if (n (item.style.display = “none”));n Array.from(dots).forEach(n item => (item.className = item.className.replace(” selected”, “”))n );n slides[slideIndex – 1].style.display = “block”;n dots[slideIndex – 1].className += ” selected”;n }n”}]