DURABILITY ASSESSMENT OF SELF COMPACTING, SELF CURING CONCRETE INCORPORATING CRUSHED ROCK POWDER AND MINERAL ADMIXTURES

[{“box”:0,”content”:”[if 992 equals=”Open Access”]

n

Open Access

n

[/if 992]n

n

Year : April 1, 2024 at 9:59 am | [if 1553 equals=””] Volume : [else] Volume :[/if 1553] | [if 424 equals=”Regular Issue”]Issue[/if 424][if 424 equals=”Special Issue”]Special Issue[/if 424] [if 424 equals=”Conference”][/if 424] : | Page : –

n

n

n

n

n

n

By

n

    n t

    [foreach 286]n

    n

    Dr Sanjay Raj A, Shrishail B. Anadinni, Anand V. Shivapur

  1. [/foreach]

    n

n

n[if 2099 not_equal=”Yes”]n

    [foreach 286] [if 1175 not_equal=””]n t

  1. Assistant Professor, Associate Dean, Professor, School of CIVIL Engineering, School of Engineering (Core Branches), Department of Civil Engineering, Bengaluru, Bengaluru, Belagavi, India, India, India
  2. n[/if 1175][/foreach]

[/if 2099][if 2099 equals=”Yes”][/if 2099]nn

n

Abstract

nCuring plays a crucial role in achieving the desired strength, characteristics, and durability of concrete. Negligent curing practices can lead to adverse effects on hydration and mechanical properties of concrete. In recent times, self-curing concrete has gained significant attention due to its potential in reducing water loss through the use of self-curing agents. The Present Research study focus on investigation on durability characteristics of self-curing self-compacting concrete using crushed rock powder and mineral admixtures. The objective of this research is to evaluate the durability properties of SCC, for M25 and M40 grade inclusive of effectiveness of mineral admixtures and self-curing agents at varying dosages. Two self-curing agents, Polyethylene glycol (PEG-400), at dosages of 1%, 1.5%, and 2%, and Superabsorbent Polymer (SAP), at dosages of 0.1%, 0.2%, and 0.3%, respectively, were utilized. The mineral admixture dosages were based on the SCC mix design. Various standard tests, including conventional slump, T50cm slump, J-ring, V-funnel, U-box, and L-box, as per EFNARC, were conducted on the specimens. Furthermore, the durability properties, such as water absorption, resistance against acid attack, and sulphate attack, were evaluated by comparing them with those of conventional normal concrete (CNC) as per IS 10262 and normal self-compacting concrete (NSCC) without self-curing agents. The curing process for CNC and NSCC followed conventional methods at ambient temperature under laboratory conditions, while self-compacting concrete incorporating self-curing agents underwent curing in air at ambient temperature. The results showed that the durability properties of self-curing concrete were significantly improved with the inclusion of 0.3% SAP mixtures, outperforming PEG-400 for M25 and M40 grades of concrete. Moreover, the addition of fly ash and silica fume to the cement mixture enhanced the resistance of the concrete, indicating improved pore structure and greater durability.

n

n

n

Keywords: Water Absorption, Acid attack, Sulphate attack, Fly ash, Silica fume and Self-Curing agents.

n[if 424 equals=”Regular Issue”][This article belongs to Journal of Polymer and Composites(jopc)]

n

[/if 424][if 424 equals=”Special Issue”][This article belongs to Special Issue under section in Journal of Polymer and Composites(jopc)][/if 424][if 424 equals=”Conference”]This article belongs to Conference [/if 424]

n

n

n

How to cite this article: Dr Sanjay Raj A, Shrishail B. Anadinni, Anand V. Shivapur DURABILITY ASSESSMENT OF SELF COMPACTING, SELF CURING CONCRETE INCORPORATING CRUSHED ROCK POWDER AND MINERAL ADMIXTURES jopc ; :-

n

How to cite this URL: Dr Sanjay Raj A, Shrishail B. Anadinni, Anand V. Shivapur DURABILITY ASSESSMENT OF SELF COMPACTING, SELF CURING CONCRETE INCORPORATING CRUSHED ROCK POWDER AND MINERAL ADMIXTURES jopc {cited };:-. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/jopc/article=/view=0

n


n[if 992 equals=”Open Access”] Full Text PDF Download[else] nvar fieldValue = “[user_role]”;nif (fieldValue == ‘indexingbodies’) {n document.write(‘Full Text PDF‘);n }nelse if (fieldValue == ‘administrator’) { document.write(‘Full Text PDF‘); }nelse if (fieldValue == ‘jopc’) { document.write(‘Full Text PDF‘); }n else { document.write(‘ ‘); }n [/if 992] [if 379 not_equal=””]n

Browse Figures

n

n

[foreach 379]n

n[/foreach]n

nn

n

n[/if 379]n

n

References

n[if 1104 equals=””]n

  1. C. Mehta and P. J. M. Monteiro, “Concrete: Microstructure, Properties, and Materials,” 3rd edition, McGraw-Hill Education, 2006.
  2. H. Khayat, “High-Performance Concrete,” John Wiley & Sons, 2007.
  3. Bonakdar and M. R. Esfahani, “Durability of Self-Compacting Concrete: A Review,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 238, pp. 117779, 2020.
  4. Banthia, “High Performance Concrete: Fracture Mechanics and Durability,” Springer, 1995.
  5. Sivakumar, S. Chinnaraju, and K. Muthusamy, “Durability Studies on Self-Compacting Concrete Incorporating Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag and Metakaolin,” Materials Today: Proceedings, vol. 33, part 5, pp. 2225-2234, 2020.
  6. Khademi, M. A. Mohammadi, M. R. Esfahani, and N. Banthia, “Durability of High-Performance Self-Compacting Concrete Containing Different Types of Nanomaterials,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 266, pp. 121114, 2021.
  7. K. Dash, “Properties of Concrete Containing Ultra-Fine Natural Steatite Powder,” Materials Today: Proceedings, vol. 5, no. 2, part 1, pp. 5931-5938, 2018.
  8. Siddique, “Performance Characteristics of High-Volume Fly Ash Concrete,” Cement and Concrete Composites, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 162-168, 2006.
  9. S. Parameswaran, A. Sivakumar, and K. Muthusamy, “Effect of Silica Fume on the Mechanical and Durability Properties of Self-Compacting Concrete,” Materials Today: Proceedings, vol. 33, part 5, pp. 2396-2403, 2020.
  10. P. Mehra and M. L. Glasser, “The Role of Metakaolin in Enhancing the Durability of Concrete,” Cement and Concrete Research, vol. 29, no. 8, pp. 1393-1397, 1999.
  11. Huang, G. Ye, X. Xie, and Z. Wu, “Effect of Fly Ash on the Durability of Self-Compacting Concrete,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 43, pp. 32-36, 2013.
  12. Shashiprakash, S. Chinnaraju, and K. Muthusamy, “High-Strength Self-Compacting Concrete with Fly Ash as Partial Replacement of Cement,” Materials Today: Proceedings, vol. 33, part 5, pp. 2365-2373, 2020.
  13. A. Al-Rahmani, I. I. Ahmed, and K. G. Mohamed, “Effect of Fly Ash and Silica Fume on Durability of Self-Compacting Concrete,” Materials and Structures, vol. 41, no. 8, pp. 1507-1516, 2008.
  14. Shetty, P. V. Hegde, and H. S. Mokashi, “Influence of Ultra-Fine Natural Steatite Powder on Properties of Self-Compacting Concrete,” Materials Today: Proceedings, vol. 33, part 5, pp. 2465-2474, 2020.
  15. Al-Mutairi, H. Bin-Mansoor, and K. Al-Mutairi, “Effect of Fly Ash on the Fresh and Hardened Properties of Self-Compacting Concrete,” International Journal of Civil, Environmental, Structural, Construction and Architectural Engineering, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 620-625, 2015.

 

 

 

IS CODES- REFERENCE BOOKS

  1. IS: 8112-2013-, “Specification for 53 Grade Ordinary Portland Cement”, Bureau of Indian Standards, New-Delhi, India: 2013

.

  1. Specification and guidelines of self-compacting concrete, EFNARC, February-2002.

 

  1. IS: 2386- Part-III, “Methods of test for aggregates for concrete”, Bureau of Indian Standards, New-Delhi, India: 1963.

 

  1. IS: 10262-2009, Indian Standard Recommended guidelines for concrete Mix Design. –

nn[/if 1104][if 1104 not_equal=””]n

    [foreach 1102]n t

  1. [if 1106 equals=””], [/if 1106][if 1106 not_equal=””],[/if 1106]
  2. n[/foreach]

n[/if 1104]

nn


nn[if 1114 equals=”Yes”]n

n[/if 1114]

n

n

[if 424 not_equal=””][else]Ahead of Print[/if 424] Open Access Original Research

n

n

n

n

n

Journal of Polymer and Composites

n

[if 344 not_equal=””]ISSN: 2321–2810[/if 344]

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

Volume
[if 424 equals=”Regular Issue”]Issue[/if 424][if 424 equals=”Special Issue”]Special Issue[/if 424] [if 424 equals=”Conference”][/if 424]
Received September 7, 2023
Accepted November 16, 2023
Published

n

n

n

n

n

nn function myFunction2() {n var x = document.getElementById(“browsefigure”);n if (x.style.display === “block”) {n x.style.display = “none”;n }n else { x.style.display = “Block”; }n }n document.querySelector(“.prevBtn”).addEventListener(“click”, () => {n changeSlides(-1);n });n document.querySelector(“.nextBtn”).addEventListener(“click”, () => {n changeSlides(1);n });n var slideIndex = 1;n showSlides(slideIndex);n function changeSlides(n) {n showSlides((slideIndex += n));n }n function currentSlide(n) {n showSlides((slideIndex = n));n }n function showSlides(n) {n var i;n var slides = document.getElementsByClassName(“Slide”);n var dots = document.getElementsByClassName(“Navdot”);n if (n > slides.length) { slideIndex = 1; }n if (n (item.style.display = “none”));n Array.from(dots).forEach(n item => (item.className = item.className.replace(” selected”, “”))n );n slides[slideIndex – 1].style.display = “block”;n dots[slideIndex – 1].className += ” selected”;n }n”}]