Strengthening of Hydraulic Lime with Synthetic, Organic, and Bio-Additives: State-of-the-Art Review on Eco-Friendly Construction

Open Access

Year : 2023 | Volume : 11 | Special Issue : 01 | Page : 87-96
By

    Chippymol James

  1. Greeshma Sivasankarapillai

  1. Research Scholar, Department of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering Guindy, Anna University, Tamil Nadu, India
  2. Associate Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering Guindy, Anna University, Tamil Nadu, India

Abstract

Cement is acknowledged to be one of the significant modern construction materials used all over the
world because of its excellent properties. Though cement dominates the construction industry, the
usage of lime binder is still replaceable because of the need for restoration and repair of existing
heritage structures. Though lime offers several advantages such as “breathing”, higher durability
and deformability, the performance of the lime mortar is still mistrusted because of its poor
compressive strength, long setting time, etc. Several researchers from the past have identified various
techniques to improve the mechanical strength and fresh properties of lime mortars. This paper
attempts to review those significant literatures that were based on performance improvement of lime
mortars in the aforesaid parameters. The notable research works include the additions of different
herbs in the lime mortar, effects of different plants and animal extracts as additives in lime mortar,
and effects of different fibers, including natural and synthetic fibers, in the lime mortar, that are
reviewed from various scrupulous literatures and the significant results and outcomes are identified
and summarized in this review article. This research review article helps the researchers and
practicing engineers to adopt the strengthening method of lime mortar that would be best suited for
their restoration applications.

Keywords: Ancient structures, bio-additives, cement-lime mortars, eco-friendly additives, lime mortar, organic additives, synthetic fibers

This article belongs to Special Issue Conference International Conference on Innovative, Sustainable Materials and Technologies (ICISMT-2022)

How to cite this article: Chippymol James, Greeshma Sivasankarapillai Strengthening of Hydraulic Lime with Synthetic, Organic, and Bio-Additives: State-of-the-Art Review on Eco-Friendly Construction jopc 2023; 11:87-96
How to cite this URL: Chippymol James, Greeshma Sivasankarapillai Strengthening of Hydraulic Lime with Synthetic, Organic, and Bio-Additives: State-of-the-Art Review on Eco-Friendly Construction jopc 2023 {cited 2023 Jun 19};11:87-96. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/jopc/article=2023/view=131873

Full Text PDF Download

Browse Figures

References

1. British Standards Institution. En BS. 459-1; Building Lime Definitions, Specifications and Conformity Criteria. London, UK: British Standards Institution; 2015.
2. Gulbe L, Vitina I, Setina J. The influence of cement on properties of lime mortars. Procedia Eng. 2017; 172: 325–332.
3. Nalon GH, Martins ROG, Alvarenga RdCSS, de Lima GES, Pedroti LG, dos Santos WJ. Effect of specimens’ shape and size on the determination of compressive strength and deformability of cement-lime mortars. Mater Res. 2018; 20: 819–825.
4. Gleize PJP, Müller A, Roman HR. Microstructural investigation of a silica fume–cement–limemortar. Cement Concrete Compos. 2003; 25 (2): 171–175.
5. Guardia C, Barluenga G, Palomar I, Diarce G. Thermal enhanced cement-lime mortars with phase change materials (PCM), lightweight aggregate and cellulose fibres. Construct Build Mater. 2019; 221: 586–594.
6. Zhang D, Zhao J, Wang D, Wang Y, Ma X. Influence of pozzolanic materials on the properties of natural hydraulic lime-based mortars. Construct Build Mater. 2020; 244: 118360. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118360.
7. Veiga M, Velosa A, Magalhães A. Experimental applications of mortars with pozzolanic additions: characterization and performance evaluation. Construct Build Mater. 2009; 23: 318–327.
8. Thirumalini S, Ravi R, Rajesh M. Experimental investigation on physical and mechanical properties of lime mortar: effect of organic addition. J Cult Herit. 2017; 31: 97–104. doi: 10.1016/j.culher.2017.10.009.
9. Malhotra SK, Tehri SP. Development of bricks from granulated blast furnace slag. Construct Build Mater. 1996; 10 (3): 191–193.
10. Nath R. Jharokha. An Illustrated Glossary of Indo–Muslim Architecture. Jaipur, India: Ajay Nath; 1986.
11. Yang FW, Zhang BJ, Pan CC, Zeng Y. Traditional mortar represented by sticky rice mortar – one of the great inventions in ancient China. Sci China E: Technol Sci. Special issue in Engineering Thermophysics. 2008; 52 (6): 1641–1647.
12. Chandra S, Eklund SL, Villarreal RR. Use of cactus in mortar and concrete. Cement Concrete Res. 1998; 28 (1): 41–51.
13. Salamore JC. Polymeric Materials Encyclopedia. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 1996.
14. Ray I, Gupta AP, Biswas M. Effect of latex and superplasticizer on Portland cement mortar in the fresh state. Cement Concrete Compos. 2009; 16 (4): 309–316.
15. Fang S, Zhang H, Zhang B, Zheng Y. The identification of organic additives in traditional lime mortar. J Cult Herit. 2014; 5: 144–150. doi: 10.1016/j.culher.2013.04.001.
16. Izaguirre A, Lanas J, Alvarez JJ. Effect of a propylene fibre on the behavior of aerial lime-based mortars. Construct Build Mater. 2011; 25: 992–1000.

17. Stefanidou M, Papachristoforou M, Kesikidou F. Fiber-reinforced lime mortars. In: 4th Historic Mortars Conference – HMC 2016 Santorini, Greece, October 10–12, 2016..
18. Katzer J, Domski J. Optimization of fibre reinforcement for waste aggregate cement composite. Construct Build Mater. 2013; 38: 790-–795.
19. Kennedy CJ, Revie WA, Troalen L, Wade M, Wess TJ. Studies of hair for use in lime plaster: implications for conservation and new work. Polym Degrad Stabil. 2013; 98 (4): 894–898.
20. Drdácký MF, Michoinová D. Lime mortars with natural fibres. In: Brandt AM, Li VC, Marshall IH, editors. Brittle Matrix Composites 7. Cambridge, UK: Woodhead Publishing; 2003. pp. 523–532.
21. Santarelli ML, Sbardella F, Zuena M, Tirillò J, Sarasini FK. Basalt fiber reinforced natural hydraulic lime mortars: a potential bio-based material for restoration. Mater Des. 2014; 63: 398–406.
22. Kesikidou F, Stefanidou M. Natural fiber-reinforced mortars. J Build Eng. 2019; 25: 100786. doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2019.100786.
23. Mazhoud B, Collet F, Pretot S, Chamoin J. Hygric and thermal properties of hemp-lime plasters. Build Environ. 2016; 96: 206–216.
24. Elfordy S, Lucas F, Tancret F, Scudeller Y, Goudet L. Mechanical and thermal properties of lime and hemp concrete manufactured by projection process. Construct Build Mater. 2008; 22: 2116–2123.
25. Codispoti R, Oliveira DV, Olivito RS, Lourenço PB, Fangueiro R. Mechanical performance of natural fiber-reinforced composites for the strengthening of masonry. Compos B Eng. 2015; 77: 74–83.
26. Ravi R, Perumal T, Sekar SK. Characterization of hydraulic lime mortar containing Opuntia ficus indica as a bio-admixture for restoration applications. Int J Architect Herit. 2016; 10 (6): 714–725. doi: 10.1080/15583058.2015.1109735.
27. Bureau of Indian Standards, Methods of Test for Building Limes, IS 6932 Part VII – 1973. New Delhi, India: Bureau of Indian Standards; 1973.
28. Thirumalini P, Ravi R, Sekar S, Nambirajan M. Study on the performance enhancement of lime mortar used in ancient temples and monuments in India. Ind J Sci Technol. 2011; 4 (11): 1484–1487.


Conference Open Access Review Article
Volume 11
Special Issue 01
Received December 21, 2022
Accepted May 10, 2022
Published June 19, 2023