Janhvi Patil
Rahul Jagtap
Ankush Sharma
Vishal Naranje
- , Department of Mechanical Engineering, Dr. Vishwanath Karad MIT World Peace University, Maharashtra, India
- , Department of Mechanical Engineering, Dr. Vishwanath Karad MIT World Peace University, Maharashtra, India
- , Centre of Excellence for Composites, Ahmedabad Textile Industry’s Research Association (ATIRA), Gujarat, India
- , Mechanical Engineering Department, Amity University, , UAE
Abstract
Single point incremental forming (SPIF) is used to form small batch production of different shapes of parts. Present study is focused on investigation of part asymmetry on the forming behavior of the parts formed using SPIF process. Wall angle as an asymmetry is considered for forming of the pyramidal frustrum. The wall angle is varied from 50o to 65o and subsequent forming forces are recorded using force dynamometer. It is observed that the increase in the wall angle for symmetric part results in increased formability to a threshold wall angle of 55o, beyond which the formability of material decreases. For the asymmetric parts, the difference in the forming forces of forming different wall angles (50o and 55o) is 28%. The difference in the forming force increases to 93.27% for part having wall angles of 50o and 60o. Furthermore, during forming of asymmetric part, it is observed that the maximum forces go on increasing till the wall angle reaches to 60o followed by sudden decrease in the forming forces. When compared to forming of symmetric part under similar conditions, it is observed that the symmetric part reaches to its fracture limit earlier as compared to that of asymmetric part. The numerical simulation gives some clear insights in the forming behavior of the asymmetric parts. Furthermore, it is observed that equivalent plastic strain first increases, and then decreases considerably resulting fracture of part of wall angle 65o.
Keywords: Forming forces, asymmetric parts, SPIF, Wall angle
References
T. J. Kim and D. Y. Yang, ‘Improvement of formability for the incremental sheet metal forming process’, Int. J. Mech. Sci., vol. 42, no. 7, pp. 1271–1286, 2000, doi: 10.1016/S0020-7403(99)00047-8.
G. Ambrogio, L. Filice, F. Gagliardi, and F. Micari, ‘Three-dimensional FE simulation of single point incremental forming: Experimental evidences and process design improving’, Comput. Plast. Fundam. Appl. – Proc. 8th Int. Conf. Comput. Plast. COMPLAS VIII, no. PART 1, pp. 259–262, 2005.
M. S. Shim and J. J. Park, ‘The formability of aluminum sheet in incremental forming’, J. Mater. Process. Technol., vol. 113, no. 1–3, pp. 654–658, 2001, doi: 10.1016/S0924-0136(01)00679-3.
J. J. Park and Y. H. Kim, ‘Fundamental studies on the incremental sheet metal forming technique’, J. Mater. Process. Technol., vol. 140, no. 1-3 SPEC., pp. 447–453, 2003, doi: 10.1016/S0924-0136(03)00768-4.
K. P. Jackson, J. M. Allwood, and M. Landert, ‘Incremental forming of sandwich panels’, J. Mater. Process. Technol., vol. 204, no. 1–3, pp. 290–303, 2008, doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.11.117.
M. C. Radu and I. Cristea, ‘Processing metal sheets by SPIF and analysis of parts quality’, Mater. Manuf. Process., vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 287–293, 2013, doi: 10.1080/10426914.2012.746702.
D. Panjwani et al., ‘A novel approach based on flexible supports for forming non-axisymmetric parts in SPISF’, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., vol. 92, no. 5–8, pp. 2463–2477, 2017, doi: 10.1007/s00170-017-0223-3.
G. Ambrogio et al., ‘Experimental investigation of the mechanical performances of titanium cranial prostheses manufactured by super plastic forming and single-point incremental forming’, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., vol. 98, no. 5–8, pp. 1489–1503, 2018, doi: 10.1007/s00170-018-2338-6.
G. Ambrogio, F. Gagliardi, M. Muzzupappa, and L. Filice, ‘Additive-incremental forming hybrid manufacturing technique to improve customised part performance’, J. Manuf. Process., vol. 37, no. March 2018, pp. 386–391, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2018.12.008.
E. Ndip-Agbor, P. Cheng, N. Moser, K. Ehmann, and J. Cao, ‘Prediction of rigid body motion in multi-pass single point incremental forming’, J. Mater. Process. Technol., vol. 269, no. December 2018, pp. 117–127, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2019.02.007.
P. K. Gandla, V. Inturi, S. Kurra, and S. Radhika, ‘Evaluation of surface roughness in incremental forming using image processing based methods’, Meas. J. Int. Meas. Confed., vol. 164, p. 108055, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.measurement.2020.108055.
W. Zhai, Y. Li, Z. Cheng, L. Sun, F. Li, and J. Li, ‘Investigation on the forming force and surface quality during ultrasonic-assisted incremental sheet forming process’, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., vol. 106, no. 7–8, pp. 2703–2719, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s00170-019-04870-0.
Y. Le Li, Z. J. Wang, W. D. Zhai, Z. N. Cheng, F. Y. Li, and X. Q. Li, ‘The influence of ultrasonic vibration on parts properties during incremental sheet forming’, Adv. Manuf., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 250–261, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s40436-021-00347-0.
C. Su et al., ‘Effects of forming parameters on the forming limit of single-point incremental forming of sheet metal’, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., vol. 113, no. 1–2, pp. 483–501, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s00170-020-06576-0.
P. Wankhede, M. V. K. Ram, K. Suresh, and A. Priyadarshini, ‘Integrated fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS for multi response optimization in incremental forming process’, Int. J. Interact. Des. Manuf., 2023, doi: 10.1007/s12008-023-01246-3.
H. Huang et al., ‘Change in geometry size and thinning rate in single-point incremental forming process of TA1 sheet: evaluation method and finite element analysis’, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., vol. 125, no. 5–6, pp. 2743–2758, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s00170-023-10935-y.
A. Rosa-Sainz, G. Centeno, M. B. Silva, and C. Vallellano, ‘Experimental investigation of polycarbonate sheets deformed by SPIF: formability, micro-mechanisms of failure and temperature analysis’, J. Mater. Res. Technol., vol. 25, pp. 7546–7565, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.07.075.
A. K. Behera, R. A. de Sousa, G. Ingarao, and V. Oleksik, ‘Single point incremental forming: An assessment of the progress and technology trends from 2005 to 2015’, J. Manuf. Process., vol. 27, pp. 37–62, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2017.03.014.
A. Bansal, R. Lingam, S. K. Yadav, and N. Venkata Reddy, ‘Prediction of forming forces in single point incremental forming’, J. Manuf. Process., vol. 28, pp. 486–493, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2017.04.016.
A. Kumar and V. Gulati, ‘Experimental investigations and optimization of forming force in incremental sheet forming’, Sadhana – Acad. Proc. Eng. Sci., vol. 43, no. 10, 2018, doi: 10.1007/s12046-018-0926-7.
J. Duflou, Y. Tunçkol, A. Szekeres, and P. Vanherck, ‘Experimental study on force measurements for single point incremental forming’, J. Mater. Process. Technol., vol. 189, no. 1–3, pp. 65–72, 2007, doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.01.005.
Journal of Polymer and Composites
| Volume | |
| Issue | |
| Received | October 30, 2023 |
| Accepted | November 22, 2023 |
| Published |
function myFunction2() {
var x = document.getElementById(“browsefigure”);
if (x.style.display === “block”) {
x.style.display = “none”;
}
else { x.style.display = “Block”; }
}
document.querySelector(“.prevBtn”).addEventListener(“click”, () => {
changeSlides(-1);
});
document.querySelector(“.nextBtn”).addEventListener(“click”, () => {
changeSlides(1);
});
var slideIndex = 1;
showSlides(slideIndex);
function changeSlides(n) {
showSlides((slideIndex += n));
}
function currentSlide(n) {
showSlides((slideIndex = n));
}
function showSlides(n) {
var i;
var slides = document.getElementsByClassName(“Slide”);
var dots = document.getElementsByClassName(“Navdot”);
if (n > slides.length) { slideIndex = 1; }
if (n (item.style.display = “none”));
Array.from(dots).forEach(
item => (item.className = item.className.replace(” selected”, “”))
);
slides[slideIndex – 1].style.display = “block”;
dots[slideIndex – 1].className += ” selected”;
}