Buckling Assessment of Concrete Column, RCC Column and Concrete Column Strengthened by CFRP with Different Slenderness Ratio.

Year : 2023 | Volume :10 | Special Issue : 03 | Page : S11-S22
By

Prakash Singh

Arun Serawat

Prashant Sharma

  1. Assistant Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Dr K N Modi University, Rajasthan, India

Abstract

Using finite element modeling, this study presents a buckling analysis and total deformation assessment of a concrete column, a column made of reinforced cement concrete (RCC), and a concrete column enhanced with Carbon Fiber-reinforced Polymer (CFRP) laminates (FEM). Utilizing the ansys18.1 software, a comprehensive analysis is carried out for columns that have a variety of slenderness ratios to arrive at a more accurate performance estimation. Because they can support the most weight overall, RCC columns are among the most important components of a building’s structure. On the other hand, because of the enormous compressive load, these structures risk failing owing to buckling. There is a greater likelihood of rapid buckling occurring in the columns that have a high slender ratio. As a result, it is essential to investigate and evaluate the effects of an excessive load on several separate columns, each of which has a distinct slenderness ratio. For this study, the slenderness ratios were determined to be 20, 30, and 40 for concrete columns, RCC columns, and RCC columns reinforced with CFRP. The findings indicate that the load-bearing capability of the columns can be improved by increasing the quantity of CFRP sheets used in their construction.

Keywords: Finite element method, carbon fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP), slenderness ratio, reinforced cement concrete, beam-column

[This article belongs to Special Issue under section in Journal of Polymer and Composites(jopc)]

How to cite this article: Prakash Singh, Arun Serawat, Prashant Sharma. Buckling Assessment of Concrete Column, RCC Column and Concrete Column Strengthened by CFRP with Different Slenderness Ratio.. Journal of Polymer and Composites. 2023; 10(03):S11-S22.
How to cite this URL: Prakash Singh, Arun Serawat, Prashant Sharma. Buckling Assessment of Concrete Column, RCC Column and Concrete Column Strengthened by CFRP with Different Slenderness Ratio.. Journal of Polymer and Composites. 2023; 10(03):S11-S22. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/jopc/article=2023/view=98001

Browse Figures

References

  1. Begum M, Driver RG, Elwi AE. Parametric study on eccentrically-loaded partially encased composite columns under major axis bending. Steel Compos Struct. 2015;19(5):1299-319. doi: 10.12989/scs.2015.19.5.1299.
  2. Ganesan R. Buckling of Composite Beam-columns with stochastic properties. Canada: Concordia University; 1998.
  3. Chung J, Matsui C, Tsuda K. Simplified design formula of slender concrete filled steel tubular beam-columns. Struct Eng Mech. 2001;12(1):71-84. doi: 10.12989/sem.2001.12.1.071.
  4. Sabu J, KP E. Analysis of short columns with and without steel casing. Int J Res Advent Technol. 2016;4(8):2321–9637.
  5. Lu YY, Li N, Li S. Behavior of FRP-confined concrete-filled steel tube columns. Polymer. 2014;6(9):1333-49.
  6. Ganesh Prabhu GG, Sundarraja MC. Behaviour of concrete filled steel tubular (CFST) short columns externally reinforced using CFRP strips composite. Constr Build Mater. 2013;47:1362-71. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.06.038.
  7. Hu HT, Lin FM, Jan YY. Nonlinear finite element analysis of reinforced concrete beams strengthened by fiber-reinforced plastics. Compos Struct. 2004;63(3-4):271-81. doi: 10.1016/S0263-8223(03)00174-0.
  8. Patel V, Lande PS. Analytical behavior of concrete filled steel tubular columns under axial compression. Int J Eng Res. 2016;5(3):27-8.
  9. Park JW, Choi SM. Structural behavior of CFRP strengthened concrete-filled steel tubes columns under axial compression loads. Steel Compos Struct. 2013;14(5):453-72. doi: 10.12989/scs.2013.14.5.453.
  10. Sharma K, Shukla M. Molecular modeling of the mechanical behavior of carbon fiber-amine functionalized multiwall carbon nanotube/epoxy composites. New Carbon Mater. 2014;29(2):132-42. doi: 10.1016/S1872-5805(14)60131-1.
  11. Alagusundaramoorthy P, Harik I, Choo CC. Shear strength of R/C beams wrapped with CFRP fabric Kentucky transportation center College of Engineering; 2002.
  12. Tiwari M, Mausam K, Sharma K, Singh RP. Investigate the optimal combination of process parameters for EDM by using a grey relational analysis. Procedia Mater Sci. 2014;5:1736-44. doi: 10.1016/J.MSPRO.2014.07.363.
  13. Buyukozturk O, Gunes O, Karaca E. Progress on Understanding debonding problems in reinforced concrete and steel members strengthened using FRP composites. Constr Build Mater. 2004;18(1):9-19. doi: 10.1016/S0950-0618(03)00094-1.
  14. Kumar A, Sharma K, Dixit AR. Role of graphene in biosensor and protective textile against viruses. Med Hypotheses. Nov 2020;144:110253. doi: 10.1016/J.MEHY.2020.110253.
  15. ACI Committee 440. 2002. ACI PRC-440.2-17: Guide for the Design and Construction of Externally Bonded FRP Systems for Strengthening Concrete Structures. MI, USA: American Concrete Institute; 2017. pp. 118.
  16. ANSYS Manual, Version (18.1).
Special Issue Subscription Original Research
Volume 10
Special Issue 03
Received October 3, 2022
Accepted October 28, 2022
Published February 23, 2023
Views: 1,766