Exploration and Evaluation of Enablers of “Sustainable Freight Transportation” Using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)

Year : 2023 | Volume : | Special Issue : 3 | Page : 1-10
By

    Deepak Sharma

  1. Assistant Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering, GLA University Mathur, Uttar Pradesh, India

Abstract

The main objective of the study is to improve environmental, social, and economic measures. Some other areas of concern of this paper are diminishing the CO2 emissions, effective optimization of the transportation costs and successful utilization of information technology, expanding the freight transportation services, and improving the concept of sustainability in transportation sectors. The focus of this study is on fulfilling sustainable transportation goals, by identifying suitable enablers. Based on the literature review, and experts’ opinions, three dimensions, and twelve enablers of sustainable freight transportation (SFT) have been identified. Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) methodology is used for the prioritization of SFT dimensions, and enablers. In AHP, a comparison of all the enablers is accomplished based on experts’ opinions. Further, the overall ranking of all the enablers is established for the effective implementation of SFT concepts.

Keywords: Analytic hierarchy process (AHP), sustainable freight transportation (SFT), enablers for implementing SFT

[This article belongs to Special Issue under section in Journal of Polymer and Composites(jopc)]

How to cite this article: Deepak Sharma Exploration and Evaluation of Enablers of “Sustainable Freight Transportation” Using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) jopc 2023; 10:1-10
How to cite this URL: Deepak Sharma Exploration and Evaluation of Enablers of “Sustainable Freight Transportation” Using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) jopc 2023 {cited 2023 Feb 15};10:1-10. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/jopc/article=2023/view=97857

References

  1. Aronsson H, Huge Brodin M. The environmental impact of changing logistics structures. Int J Logist Manag. 2006;17(3):394-415. doi: 10.1108/09574090610717545.
  2. Awasthi A, Chauhan SS. Using AHP and Dempster–Shafer theory for evaluating sustainable transport solutions. Environ Modell Softw. 2011;26(6):787-96. doi: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.11.010.
  3. Bretzke W-R, Barkawi K. Sustainable logistics, lecture notes in logistics. Berlin, Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2013. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-34375-9.
  4. Comi A, Russo F. Urban freight transport measures: environmental evidences from the cities. Proceedings of the 1st World Sustainability Forum, 2011. p. 760. doi: 10.3390/wsf-00760.
  5. Crainic TG. Long-haul freight transportation. In: Hall RW, editor. Handbook of Transportation Science, International Series in Operations Research & Management Science. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2003. pp. 451-516. doi: 10.1007/0-306-48058-1_13.
  6. Goswami M, Sarma P, Kumar G. Integrating enablers of sustainable freight transportation and perishable commodity supply chain. Int J Strateg Decis Sci. 2019;10(2):25-48. doi: 10.4018/IJSDS.2019040102.
  7. Hahn CK, Duplaga EA, Hartley JL. Supply-chain synchronization: lessons from Hyundai motor company. Interfaces. 2000;30(4):32-45. doi: 10.1287/inte.30.4.32.11642.
  8. Halldórsson Á, Kovács G. The sustainable agenda and energy efficiency: logistics solutions and supply chains in times of climate change. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag. 2010;40(1/2):5-13. doi: 10.1108/09600031011018019.
  9. Kumar A, Anbanandam R. Assessment of environmental and social sustainability performance of the freight transportation industry: an index-based approach. Transp Policy. 2022;124:43-60. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2020.01.006.
  10. Kumar S, Parashar N, Haleem A. Analytical hierarchy process applied to vendor selection problem: small scale, medium scale and large scale industries. Bus Intell J. 2009;2(2):355-62.
  11. Lammgård C. Intermodal train services: A business challenge and a measure for decarbonisation for logistics service providers. Res Transp Bus Manag. 2012;5:48-56. doi: 10.1016/j.rtbm.2012.11.001.
  12. Lin C-Y, Ho Y-H. Determinants of green practice adoption for logistics companies in China. J Bus Ethics. 2011;98(1):67-83. doi: 10.1007/s10551-010-0535-9.
  13. Lindholm M. A sustainable perspective on urban freight transport: factors affecting local authorities in the planning procedures. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2010;2(3):6205-16. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.04.031.
  14. Litman T. Developing indicators for comprehensive and sustainable transport planning. Transp Res Rec. 2007;2017(1):10-5. doi: 10.3141/2017-02.
  15. Litman T, Burwell D. Issues in sustainable transportation. Int J Glob Environ Issues. 2006;6(4):331. doi: 10.1504/IJGENVI.2006.010889.
  16. Longoni A, Luzzini D, Guerci M. Deploying environmental management across functions: the relationship between green human resource management and green supply chain management. J Bus Ethics. 2018;151(4):1081-95. doi: 10.1007/s10551-016-3228-1.
  17. Mathivathanan D, Kannan D, Haq AN. Sustainable supply chain management practices in Indian automotive industry: A multi-stakeholder view. Resour Conserv Recycl. 2018;128:284-305. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.01.003.
  18. Mudgal RK, Shankar R, Talib P, Raj T. Modelling the barriers of green supply chain practices: an Indian perspective. Int J Logist Syst Manag. 2010;7(1):81. doi: 10.1504/IJLSM.2010.033891.
  19. Pathak DK, Thakur LS, Rahman S. Performance evaluation framework for sustainable freight transportation systems. Int J Prod Res. 2019;57(19):6202-22. doi: 10.1080/00207543.2019.1602741.
  20. Perego A, Perotti S, Mangiaracina R. ICT for logistics and freight transportation: a literature review and research agenda. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag. 2011;41(5):457-83. doi: 10.1108/09600031111138826.
  21. Rajak S, Parthiban P, Dhanalakshmi R. Sustainable transportation systems performance evaluation using fuzzy logic. Ecol Indic. 2016;71:503-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.07.031.
  22. Ratanavaraha V, Jomnonkwao S. Trends in Thailand CO2 emissions in the transportation sector and Policy Mitigation. Transp Policy. 2015;41:136-46. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2015.01.007.
  23. Reforming international investment governance. New York, Geneva: United Nations; 2015. World investment report.
  24. Ruamsook K, Thomchick EA, Ruamsook K, Thomchick EA. Sustainable freight transportation: a review of strategies; 2012. doi: 10.22004/AG.ECON.207083.
  25. Saaty TL. Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. Int J Serv Sci. 2008;1(1):83. doi: 10.1504/IJSSCI.2008.017590.
  26. Saaty TL. Analytic hierarchy process. In: Armitage P, Colton T, editors. Encyclopedia of biostatistics. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2005. p. b2a4a002. doi: 10.1002/0470011815.b2a4a002.
  27. Saaty TL. Fundamentals of the analytic hierarchy process. In: Schmoldt DL, Kangas J, Mendoza GA, Pesonen M, editors. The Analytic Hierarchy Process in Natural Resource and Environmental Decision Making, Managing Forest Ecosystems. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands; 2001. p. 15-35. doi: 10.1007/978-94-015-9799-9_2.
  28. Sarkis J, Zhu Q. Environmental sustainability and production: taking the road less travelled. Int J Prod Res. 2018;56(1-2):743-59. doi: 10.1080/00207543.2017.1365182.
  29. Sitek P, Wikarek J, Grzybowska K. A multi-agent approach to the multi-echelon capacitated vehicle routing problem. In: Corchado JM, Bajo J, Kozlak J, Pawlewski P, Molina JM, Gaudou B, Julian V, Unland R, Lopes F, Hallenborg K, García Teodoro P, (editors). Highlights of Practical Applications of Heterogeneous Multi-Agent Systems. The PAAMS Collection. PAAMS 2014. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 430. Cham: Springer; 2014. pp. 121-32. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-07767-3_12.
  30. Sureeyatanapas P, Poophiukhok P, Pathumnakul S. Green initiatives for logistics service providers: an investigation of antecedent factors and the contributions to corporate goals. J Clean Prod. 2018;191:1-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.206.
  31. Swafford PM, Ghosh S, Murthy N. Achieving supply chain agility through IT integration and flexibility. Int J Prod Econ. 2008;116(2):288-97. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2008.09.002.
  32. Tornatzky LG, Fleischer M, Chakrabarti AK. The processes of technological innovation, Issues in organization and management series. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books; 1990.
  33. Ülengin F, Işık M, Ekici ŞÖ, Özaydın Ö, Kabak Ö, Topçu Yİ. Policy developments for the reduction of climate change impacts by the transportation sector. Transp Policy. 2018;61:36-50. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2017.09.008.
  34. Garg, D., Luthra, S. and Haleem, A., 2014. Ranking of performance measures of GSCM towards sustainability: Using analytic hierarchy process. Int J Soc Manag Econ Bus Eng, 8(3), pp.764-770.
  35. Garcia FJ, Ciko L, Gaurav A, Hough K. Reforming the International Investment Regime: Lessons from International Trade Law. Journal of International Economic Law. 2015 Dec 1;18(4):861-92.

Special Issue Subscription Original Research
Volume 10
Special Issue 3
Received October 9, 2022
Accepted November 30, 2022
Published February 15, 2023