[{“box”:0,”content”:”
n
n
n
n
- n t
n
n[/foreach]
n
n
- [foreach 286] [if 1175 not_equal=””]n t
- Assistant Professor,R.V.R & J.C College of Engineering (A), Department of Civil Engineering,Andhra Pradesh,India
n[/if 1175][/foreach]
n
Abstract
nThe flow and strength characteristics of fiber-reinforced self-compacting concrete (SCC) with different aspect (l/d) ratios of fibers are recommended to be studied. After achieving a satisfactory SCC mix, crimped steel fibers with l/d ratio 30 are designated as CSF30; with l/d ratio 40 are designated as CSF40, with l/d ratio 50 is designated as CSF50 and with l/d ratio 62.5 is designated as CSF62.5 fibers are added at a fixed percentage of 2% by weight of cement. In this study diameter of fibers, 0.4 mm is constant, but lengths are varying as 12 mm, 16 mm, 20 mm, and 25 mm were added, and prepared different SCC-CSF mixes. Except for the blocking ratio, all other flow properties are within limits, when the aspect ratio of fibers is varied from 30 to 62.5. The up to l/d =50 blocking ratio is also within limits. If l/d =62.5, the SCC-CSF mix is failing in the blocking ratio test. There is a marginal increase in compressive strength and a considerable increase in split tensile strength and modulus of rupture by adding different l/d ratios of fibers.
n
Keywords: Self-compacting concrete, Crimpled steel fibers, Mechanical properties, Non-destructive properties, and Statistical analysis
n[if 424 equals=”Regular Issue”][This article belongs to Journal of Polymer and Composites(jopc)]
n
n
n
n
n
nn
nn
Full Text
n[if 992 equals=”Open Access”] https://storage.googleapis.com/journals-stmjournals-com-wp-media-to-gcp-offload/2023/08/57764fee-s65-s75-experimental-study-on-fresh-and-mechanical-properties-1.pdf[else] nvar fieldValue = “[user_role]”;nif (fieldValue == ‘indexingbodies’) {n document.write(‘https://storage.googleapis.com/journals-stmjournals-com-wp-media-to-gcp-offload/2023/08/57764fee-s65-s75-experimental-study-on-fresh-and-mechanical-properties-1.pdf’);n }nelse if (fieldValue == ‘administrator’) { document.write(‘https://storage.googleapis.com/journals-stmjournals-com-wp-media-to-gcp-offload/2023/08/57764fee-s65-s75-experimental-study-on-fresh-and-mechanical-properties-1.pdf’); }n else { document.write(‘ ‘); }n [/if 992] [if 379 not_equal=””]n
Browse Figures
n
n[/if 379]n
References
n[if 1104 equals=””]n
1. Nan Sua, Kung-Chung Hsu and His-Wen Chai A simple mix design method for self-compacting concrete. Cement and Concrete Research 31 (2001), pp.1799–1807.
2. Okamura H, Ouchi M. Self-compacting concrete. Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology. 2003;1(1):5–15.
3. Bypaneni Krishna Chaitanya, Ilango Sivakumar. Experimental investigation on bond behaviour, durability and microstructural analysis of self‑compacting concrete using waste copper slag. Journal of Building Pathology and Rehabilitation (2022) 7:85.
4. Chaitanya BK, Sivakumar I (2022) Flow-behaviour, microstructure, and strength properties of self-compacting concrete using waste copper slag as fine aggregate. InnovInfrastructSolut7:181. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s41062- 022- 00766-3
5. Chaitanya BK, Kumar IS (2022) Effect of waste copper slag as a substitute in cement and concrete—a review. IOP Conf Ser EarthEnviron Sci 982(1):012029. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1088/ 1755- 1315/982/1/ 012029
6. Krishna Chaitanya B, Sivakumar I (2021) Influence of waste copper slag on flexural strength properties ofof self-compacting concrete. Mater Today Proc 42:671–676
7. R. Vaishnav Kumar, BypaneniKrishna Chaitanya, L.N.K. SaiMadupu and N. Venkata Sairam Kumar. Evaluation of mechanical and flow properties of Crimpled steel fiber in self compacting concrete. Volume 45, Part 6, 2021, Pages 4835–4840.
8. Mustafa Sahmaran, AlperenYurtseven, I. Ozgur Yaman Workability of hybrid fiber reinforced self-compacting concrete Building and Environment 40 (2005), pp.1672–1677.
9. Ning Li, ZuquanJin, Guangcheng Long, Lou Chen, Qiang Fu, Yong Yu, Xiaoying Zhang, ChuanshengXiong. Impact resistance of steel fiber-reinforced self-compacting concrete (SCC) at high strain rates. Journal of Building Engineering, Volume 38,2021, 102212, ISSN 2352-7102, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102212.
10. M. Mastali, A. Dalvand. Use of silica fume and recycled steel fibers in self-compacting concrete (SCC). Construction and Building Materials, Volume 125,2016, Pages 196-209, ISSN 0950-0618.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.08.046.
11. Ramkumar K.B., Kannan Rajkumar P.R., Impact of hybrid steel fibres on fresh and mechanical properties of Self-compacting concrete, Case Studies in Construction Materials, Volume17, 2022, e01274, ISSN:2214-5095.
12. Anas Alrawashdeh, OzgurEren, Mechanical and physical characterisation of steel fibre reinforced self-compacting concrete: Different aspect ratios and volume fractions of fibres, results in engineering, Volume 13,2022,100335, ISSN 2590-1230.
13. Hassan M. Magbool, Abdullah M. Zeyad. The effect of various steel fibers and volcanic pumice powder on fracture characteristics of Self-Compacting concrete, Construction and Building Materials, Volume 312, 2021, 125444, ISSN 0950-0618.
14. IS:269:2015, Ordinary portland cement-Specification (Sixth Revision), Bureau of Indian Standard, New Delhi.
15. IS 9103: 1999, Concrete Admixtures-Specification (First Revision), Bureau of Indian Standard, New Delhi.
16. IS 383-2016, Specification for coarse and fine aggregates from natural sources for concrete, Bureau Of Indian Standard, New Delhi.
17. EFNARC, 2002. Specification and Guidelines for Self-Compacting Concrete.
18. EFNARC,2005.T he European Guidelines for Self-Compacting Concrete
19. IS:2386 (Part-3): 1963. Indian Standard methods of test for aggregates for concrete, Bureau Of Indian Standard, New Delhi.
20. IS 10262:2019, Concrete Mix, Proportioning Guidelines (first revision), Bureau of Indian Standard, New Delhi.
21. IS 516:2015, Methods of Tests for Strength of Concrete, Bureau of Indian Standard, New Delhi.
22. IS: 13311 (Part-1):1992, Non-Destructive testing of Concrete-Methods of Test-Part 1 Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity. Bureau of Indian Standard, New Delhi.
23. IS: 13311 (Part 2):1992. Non-Destructive testing of Concrete-Methods of test, Part 2 Rebound Hammer. Bureau Of Indian Standard, New Delhi.
24. B. Krishna Chaitanya and P. PrasanaKumar. Performance. Evaluation of glass fiber reinforced high-performance concrete with silica fume and nano-silica. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, Vol. 982 (012018), 2022.
25. N. Venkata Sairam Kumar, K.S. Sai Ram, Performance Of Concrete At Elevated Temperatures Made With Crushed Rock Dust As Filler Material, Materials Today: Proceedings, Volume 18, Part 7,2019, Pages 2270-2278, ISSN 2214–7853.
26. N. Venkata Sairam Kumar, K.S. Sai Ram. Experimental study on properties of concrete containing crushed rock dust as a partial replacement of cement, Materials Today: Proceedings, Volume 5, Issue 2, Part 2,2018, Pages 7240-7246, ISSN 2214–7853.
nn[/if 1104][if 1104 not_equal=””]n
- [foreach 1102]n t
- [if 1106 equals=””], [/if 1106][if 1106 not_equal=””],[/if 1106]
n[/foreach]
n[/if 1104]
nn
nn[if 1114 equals=”Yes”]n
n[/if 1114]
n
n
n
| Volume | 11 |
| Issue | 01 |
| Received | December 21, 2022 |
| Accepted | April 27, 2023 |
| Published | June 19, 2023 |
n
n
n
n
n[/foreach]
n[/if 1190] [if 1177 not_equal=””]n
n
n[/foreach]
n[/if 1177]
n
n
n
n function myFunction2() {n var x = document.getElementById(“browsefigure”);n if (x.style.display === “block”) {n x.style.display = “none”;n }n else { x.style.display = “Block”; }n }n document.querySelector(“.prevBtn”).addEventListener(“click”, () => {n changeSlides(-1);n });n document.querySelector(“.nextBtn”).addEventListener(“click”, () => {n changeSlides(1);n });n var slideIndex = 1;n showSlides(slideIndex);n function changeSlides(n) {n showSlides((slideIndex += n));n }n function currentSlide(n) {n showSlides((slideIndex = n));n }n function showSlides(n) {n var i;n var slides = document.getElementsByClassName(“Slide”);n var dots = document.getElementsByClassName(“Navdot”);n if (n > slides.length) { slideIndex = 1; }n if (n (item.style.display = “none”));n Array.from(dots).forEach(n item => (item.className = item.className.replace(” selected”, “”))n );n slides[slideIndex – 1].style.display = “block”;n dots[slideIndex – 1].className += ” selected”;n }n n function myfun() {n x = document.getElementById(“editor”);n y = document.getElementById(“down”);n z = document.getElementById(“up”);n if (x.style.display == “none”) {n x.style.display = “block”;n }n else {n x.style.display = “none”;n }n if (y.style.display == “none”) {n y.style.display = “block”;n }n else {n y.style.display = “none”;n }n if (z.style.display == “none”) {n z.style.display = “block”;n }n else {n z.style.display = “none”;n }n }n function myfun2() {n x = document.getElementById(“reviewer”);n y = document.getElementById(“down2”);n z = document.getElementById(“up2”);n if (x.style.display == “none”) {n x.style.display = “block”;n }n else {n x.style.display = “none”;n }n if (y.style.display == “none”) {n y.style.display = “block”;n }n else {n y.style.display = “none”;n }n if (z.style.display == “none”) {n z.style.display = “block”;n }n else {n z.style.display = “none”;n }n }n”}]