[{“box”:0,”content”:”n[if 992 equals=”Open Access”]n
n
Open Access
nn
n
n[/if 992]n
n
n
n
n
n
Saurabh Jambolkar, Shivendra Singh Thakur, Shilpi Tomar
n
- n t
n
n
n[/foreach]
n
n[if 2099 not_equal=”Yes”]n
- [foreach 286] [if 1175 not_equal=””]n t
- M. Tech Scholar,, Professsor,, Professsor, Samrat Ashok Technological Institute, Vidisha,, Samrat Ashok Technological Institute,, Samrat Ashok Technological Institute, Madhya Pradesh,, Madhya Pradesh,, Madhya Pradesh, India, India, India
n[/if 1175][/foreach]
n[/if 2099][if 2099 equals=”Yes”][/if 2099]n
Abstract
nMultilevel inverters play a major role in medium voltage, high power and renewable applications. It is also used in certain applications where high switching frequency, and high output voltage gain are required. The switching transient period of a MOSFET should be minimal because a high dv/dt rate could result in permanent damage to the MOSFET. The harmonics present could cause many problems and so it has to be minimized. The harmonic content in the output voltage and the electromagnetic interference can be reduced with the help of small filters. It uses high switching frequency pulse width modulation for switching as it leads to high efficiency, and fast response, with a small and low-cost filter. There are classical and optimization techniques for harmonic reduction. Compared to the classical method, advanced optimization techniques are vital in determining the switching angles, switching positions and harmonic reduction because of their simplicity. There exist a few optimization techniques for harmonic reduction in multilevel inverters which include the Firefly algorithm, Genetic algorithm, Firefly Assisted Genetic Algorithm, and Grey Wolf Optimization algorithm. Here a novel 15-level inverter design based on Grey Wolf Optimization (GWO) for green energy applications is proposed. The number of switches used in the circuit is minimized with the Grey Wolf Optimizer (GWO) algorithm applied to the 15-level inverter. In the proposed work, the required fundamental voltage is maintained at the rated voltage and a few high-order harmonics are excluded. The best switching angles for a cascaded multilevel inverter are estimated using the natural leadership hierarchy and hunting mechanism of grey wolves. The total harmonic distortion of the proposed system is reduced to 6.629%. The following are the objectives of the Research work To perform the comparative analysis of classical multilevel inverter schemes, To design a multilevel inverter with minimized current harmonics, low voltage stress and increased efficiency, To tune the parameters of multilevel inverter by Grey Wolf Optimization (GWO) and reduce the harmonic distortion.
n
Keywords: Genetic Algorithm, fossil fuel, PV capacity, cascaded multilevel inverter, current harmonics, Fuel Cells
n[if 424 equals=”Regular Issue”][This article belongs to Journal of Nuclear Engineering & Technology(jonet)]
n
n
n
n
n
nn[if 992 equals=”Open Access”] Full Text PDF Download[/if 992] n
nn[if 379 not_equal=””]n
Browse Figures
n
n[/if 379]n
References
n[if 1104 equals=””]n
- J. Yu, Y. S. Jung, J. Y. Choi, I. Choy, J. H. Song, and G. S. Kim, “A novel two-mode MPPT control algorithm based on comparative study of existing algorithms,” in 29th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, pp. 1531-1534, 2002.
- H. R. Enslin, “Maximum power point tracking: a cost saving necessity in solar energy systems,” in 16th IEEE Annual Conference of Industrial Electronics Society (IECON), vol.2, pp.1073-1077, 1990.
- R. Espinoza, G. Joos, J. I. Guzman, L. A. Moran, and R. P. Burgos, “Selective harmonic elimination and current/voltage control in current/voltage-source topologies: a unified approach,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 48, pp.71-81, 2001.
- H. Hussein, I. Muta, T. Hoshino, and M. Osakada, “Maximum photovoltaic power tracking: an algorithm for rapidly changing atmospheric conditions,” In IEE Proceedings Generation, Transmission and Distribution, vol.142, no.1, pp. 59-64, 1995.
- Esram and P. L. Chapman, “Comparison of Photovoltaic Array Maximum Power Point Tracking Techniques,” IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, , vol.22, no.2, pp.439-449, 2007.
- N. A. Ali, M. H. Saied, M. Z. Mostafa and T. M. Abdel- Moneim, “A survey of maximum PPT techniques of PV systems,” 2012 IEEE Energytech, Cleveland, OH, USA, 2012, pp. 1-17, doi: 10.1109/EnergyTech.2012.6304652.
- Sutikno, N. R. N. Idris, A. Jidin and M. N. Cirstea, “An Improved FPGA Implementation of Direct Torque Control for Induction Machines,” in IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 1280-1290, Aug. 2013, doi: 10.1109/TII.2012.2222420.
- Nur Atharah Kamarzaman, Chee Wei Tan. A comprehensive review of maximum power point tracking algorithms for photovoltaic systems. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. Volume 37, September 2014, Pages 585-598
- Lyden S, Haque ME. Maximum Power Point Tracking techniques for photovoltaic systems: A comprehensive review and comparative analysis. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews. 2015 Dec 1;52:1504-18.
- Chen Y, Liu L, Le H, Zhang H. Discrepant responses of the global electron content to the solar cycle and solar rotation variations of EUV irradiance. Earth, Planets and Space. 2015 Dec;67:1-8.
- Faranda, R. and Leva, S. (2008) Energy Comparison of MPPT Techniques for PV Systems. WSEAS Transactions on Power Systems, 3, 446-455.
- Khatib TT, Mohamed A, Amin N, Sopian K. An efficient maximum power point tracking controller for photovoltaic systems using new boost converter design and improved control algorithm. WSEAS Transactions on power systems. 2010 Apr;5(2):53-63.
- Jain S, Agarwal V. New current control based MPPT technique for single stage grid connected PV systems. Energy conversion and management. 2007 Feb 1;48(2):625-44.
- Kerekes T, Teodorescu R, Borup U. Transformerless photovoltaic inverters connected to the grid. InAPEC 07-Twenty-Second Annual IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition 2007 Feb 25 (pp. 1733-1737). IEEE.
- Zainudin, H.N. and Mekhilef, S. (2010) Comparison Study of Maximum Power Point Tracker Techniques for PV Systems. Proceedings of the 14th International Middle East Power Systems Conference (MEPCON’10), Cairo University, Egypt, 19-21 December 2010, 750-755.
nn[/if 1104][if 1104 not_equal=””]n
- [foreach 1102]n t
- [if 1106 equals=””], [/if 1106][if 1106 not_equal=””],[/if 1106]
n[/foreach]
n[/if 1104]
nn
nn[if 1114 equals=”Yes”]n
n[/if 1114]
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
| Volume | 14 | |
| [if 424 equals=”Regular Issue”]Issue[/if 424][if 424 equals=”Special Issue”]Special Issue[/if 424] [if 424 equals=”Conference”][/if 424] | 01 | |
| Received | February 26, 2024 | |
| Accepted | June 4, 2024 | |
| Published | April 29, 2024 |
n
n
n
n
n
n function myFunction2() {n var x = document.getElementById(“browsefigure”);n if (x.style.display === “block”) {n x.style.display = “none”;n }n else { x.style.display = “Block”; }n }n document.querySelector(“.prevBtn”).addEventListener(“click”, () => {n changeSlides(-1);n });n document.querySelector(“.nextBtn”).addEventListener(“click”, () => {n changeSlides(1);n });n var slideIndex = 1;n showSlides(slideIndex);n function changeSlides(n) {n showSlides((slideIndex += n));n }n function currentSlide(n) {n showSlides((slideIndex = n));n }n function showSlides(n) {n var i;n var slides = document.getElementsByClassName(“Slide”);n var dots = document.getElementsByClassName(“Navdot”);n if (n > slides.length) { slideIndex = 1; }n if (n (item.style.display = “none”));n Array.from(dots).forEach(n item => (item.className = item.className.replace(” selected”, “”))n );n slides[slideIndex – 1].style.display = “block”;n dots[slideIndex – 1].className += ” selected”;n }nn”}]