Crowdfunding: History, Progress and Major Issues

Open Access

Year : 2021 | Volume : | Issue : 1 | Page : 25-38
By

    Mohit Baha

  1. Research Scholar, University of Allahabad, Uttar Pradesh, India

Abstract

In the recent years, crowdfunding has emerged as a popular tool for fundraising, helping to convert customers into investors, who can provide funds for the business. Hence, crowdfunding is a new mechanism of fundraising, which provides an innovative method to bridge the gap between investor and fund-seeker and has both economic and social implications. The research aims to analyze, study and interpret the new emerging concept of crowdfunding, and to understand the manner in which it is compatible with the conventional financial methods used by various business enterprises. The present study helps to recognize a new emerging shape for the crowdfunding, a structure which allows to take advantage of the traditional limits of funds of investment. Hence, both the capability to attract a large number of investors and the social impact of the project represents the importance of the crowdfunding.

Keywords: Crowdfunding, crowdsourcing, funding, platform, mechanism of fundraising

[This article belongs to Journal of Capital Market and Securities Law(jcmsl)]

How to cite this article: Mohit Baha Crowdfunding: History, Progress and Major Issues jcmsl 2021; 4:25-38
How to cite this URL: Mohit Baha Crowdfunding: History, Progress and Major Issues jcmsl 2021 {cited 2021 Oct 08};4:25-38. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/jcmsl/article=2021/view=91211

Full Text PDF Download

References

1. Schwienbacher A, Larralde B. Crowdfunding of small entrepreneurial ventures. In: Handbook of entrepreneurial finance. Oxford University Press; 2010.
2. Berger AN, Udell GF. The economics of small business finance: the roles of private equity and debt markets in the financial growth cycle. J Banking Fin. 1998;22(6):613–73.
3. Bhide A. Bootstrap finance: the art of start-ups. Harv Bus Rev. 1992;70(6):109–17. PMID 10122688.
4. Ebben J, Johnson A. Bootstrapping in small firms: an empirical analysis of change over time. J Bus Venturing. 2006;21(6):851–65. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2005.06.007.
5. Winborg J, Landström H. Financial bootstrapping in small businesses. J Bus Venturing. 2001;16(3):235–54. doi: 10.1016/S0883–9026(99)00055–5.
6. Belleflamme P, Lambert T, Schwienbacher A. Crowdfunding: tapping the right crowd. J Bus Venturing. 2014;29(5):585–609. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2013.07.003.
7. Hemer J 2011. A snapshot on crowdfunding (No. R2/2011). Working papers firms and region.
8. Kuppuswamy V, Bayus BL. Crowdfunding creative ideas: the dynamics of project backers in Kickstarter. UNC Kenan-Flagler research paper, (2013–15). SSRN Journal. 2014. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2234765.
9. Wash R. The value of completing crowdfunding projects. In: Seventh International advancement of artificial intelligence conference on Weblogs and social media (ICWSM). Boston: ICWSM; 2013.
10. Giudici G, Guerini M, Rossi Lamastra C. Why crowdfunding projects can succeed: the role of proponents’ individual and territorial social capital. SSRN Journal. 2013. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2255944.
11. Wheat RE, Wang Y, Byrnes JE, Ranganathan J. Raising money for scientific research through crowdfunding. Trends Ecol Evol. 2013;28(2):71–2. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2012.11.001, PMID 23219380.
12. Mollick E. The dynamics of crowdfunding: an exploratory study. J Bus Venturing. 2014;29(1):1–16. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2013.06.005.
13. Burkett E. Crowdfunding exemption-online investment crowdfunding and US securities regulation, A. Trans Tenn J Bus L. 2011;13:63.
14. Bretschneider U, Knaub K, Wieck E. Motivations for crowdfunding: what drives the crowd to invest in start-ups? In: Twenty-Second Eur Conference on Information Systems; 2014. p. 1–11.
15. Thürridl C, Kamleitner B. What goes around comes around? rewards as strategic assets in crowdfunding. Calif Manag Rev. 2016;58(2):88–110. doi: 10.1525/cmr.2016.58.2.88.
16. Zheng H, Hung J-L, Qi Z, Xu B. The role of trust management in reward-based crowdfunding. Online Inf Rev. 2016;40(1):97–118. doi: 10.1108/OIR-04–2015–0099.
17. Kuppuswamy V, Bayus BL. Handbook of new product development research. Available at SSRN; 2015b. Available from: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2685739.
18. Jeppesen LB, Lakhani KR. Marginality and problem-solving effectiveness in broadcast search. Organ Sci. 2010;21(5):1016–33. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1090.0491.
19. Agrawal AK, Catalini C, Goldfarb A. Some simple economics of crowdfunding. Innovation Policy and the Economy. 2014:63–97. doi: 10.1086/674021 (No w19133).
20. Kleemann F, Voß GG, Rieder K. Un (der) paid innovators. Science, Technology & Innovation Studies. Vol. 4; 2008.
21. Ferrary M, Granovetter M. The role of venture capital firms in Silicon Valley’s complex innovation network. Econ Soc. 2009;38(2):326–59. doi: 10.1080/03085140902786827.
22. Gerber EM, Hui JS, Kuo PY. Crowdfunding: why people are motivated to post and fund projects on crowdfunding platforms. Proceedings of the international workshop on design, influence, and social technologies: techniques, impacts and ethics. 2012, February. doi: 10.1145/2530540.
23. Franke N, Klausberger K. Design communities: business Model of the Future? 2008.
24. Baldwin C, Hienerth C, Von Hippel E. How user innovations become commercial products: A theoretical investigation and case study. Res Policy. 2006;35(9):1291–313. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2006.04.012.
25. David PA, Shapiro JS. Community-based production of open-source software: what do we know about the developers who participate? Inf Econ Policy. 2008;20(4):364–98. doi: 10.1016/j.infoecopol.2008.10.001.
26. Von Hippel E. Democratizing innovation: the evolving phenomenon of user innovation; 2005.
27. Agrawal AK, Catalini C, Goldfarb A. The geography of crowdfunding. SSRN Journal. 2011. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1692661 (No w16820).
28. Hsu DH. What do entrepreneurs pay for venture capital affiliation? J Fin. 2004;59(4):1805–44. doi: 10.1111/j.1540–6261.2004.00680.x.
29. Macht SA, Weatherston J. The Benefits of Online Crowdfunding for Fund-Seeking Business Ventures. Strateg Change. 2014;23(1–2):1–14. doi: 10.1002/jsc.1955.
30. Belleflamme P, Lambert T, Schwienbacher A. Individual crowdfunding practices. Venture Cap. 2013;15(4):313–33. doi: 10.1080/13691066.2013.785151.
31. Mitra D. The role of crowdfunding in entrepreneurial finance. Delhi Bus Rev. 2012;13(2):67–72. doi: 10.51768/dbr.v13i2.132201218.
32. Valanciene L, Jegeleviciute S. Valuation of crowdfunding: benefits and drawbacks. Econ Manag. 2013;18(1):39–48.
33. Cassar G. The financing of business start-ups. J Bus Venturing. 2004;19(2):261–83. doi: 10.1016/S0883–9026(03)00029–6.
34. Cosh A, Cumming D, Hughes A. Outside entrepreneurial capital. Econ J. 2009:1494–533.
35. Gompers PA, Lerner J. The money of invention: how venture capital creates new wealth. Comput Rev. 2004;45(1):55–6.
36. Gorman M, Sahlman WA. What do venture capitalists do? J Bus Venturing. 1989;4(4):231–48. doi: 10.1016/0883–9026(89)90014–1.
37. Kortum S, Lerner J. Does venture capital spur innovation? Advances in the Study of Entrepreneurship, Innovation & Economic Growth. 1998;W6846:1–44. doi: 10.1016/S1048–4736(01)13003–1.
38. Zvilichovsky D, Inbar Y, Barzilay O. Playing both sides of the market: success and reciprocity on crowdfunding platforms. SSRN Journal. 2014. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2304101.
39. Howe J. Crowdsourcing: how the power of the crowd is driving the future of business. Random House; 2008.
40. Brabham DC. Moving the crowd at iStockphoto: the composition of the crowd and motivations for participation in a crowdsourcing application. FM. 2008. doi: 10.5210/fm.v13i6.2159.
41. Surowiecki J. The wisdom of crowds: why the many are smarter than the few and how collective wisdom shapes business. Econ Soc Nations. 2004;296.
42. Lévy P. Collective intelligence: mankind’s emerging world in cyberspace; 1997.
43. Freedman BDM, Nutting MR 2015. A brief history of crowdfunding including rewards, donation, debt, and equity platforms in the USA. Freedman and Nutting.
44. Burtch G, Ghose A, Wattal S. An empirical examination of the antecedents and consequences of contribution patterns in crowdfunded markets an empirical examination of the antecedents and consequences of contribution patterns in crowd-funded markets. Inf Syst Res. 2013a;24(3):499–519. doi: 10.1287/isre.1120.0468.
45. Smith S, Windmeijer F, Wright E. Peer effects in charitable giving: evidence from the (Running) field. Econ J. 2015;125(585):1053–71. doi: 10.1111/ecoj.12114.
46. Andreoni J. Philanthropy. In: Kolm S, Ythier J, editors, Handbook of the economics of giving, altruism and reciprocity: foundations. North-Holland/Elsevier; 2006. p. 1201–69.
47. Vesterlund L. Why do people give? The Nonprofit Sector: A Research Handbook. 2006;2:568–87. doi: 10.1177/0275074005275308.
48. Bergstrom T, Blume L, Varian H. On the private provision of public goods. J Public Econ. 1986;29(1):25–49. doi: 10.1016/0047–2727(86)90024–1.
49. Steinberg D. The Kickstarter handbook. Real-life crowdfunding success stories; 2012. Available from: http://www.seaofstories.com/download/Kickstarter-Titleinfo_Sheet.pdf.
50. Ortega ACB, Bell F. Online social lending: borrower generated content. Available from: http://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2008/380. In: Proceedings Am Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS). Am Conference on Information Systems. Vol. 2008; 2008.
51. Bernstein S, Korteweg A, Laws K. Attracting early-stage investors: evidence from a randomized field experiment. J Fin. 2017;72(2):509–38. doi: 10.1111/jofi.12470.
52. Kolodny L. AngelList and beyond: what VC’s really think of crowdfunding. The Wall Street Journal; 2013, October 8.
53. Ramsinghani M. How software is eating venture capital; 2013, October 2.
54. Stone B. AngelList—the social network for startups. Bloomberg; 2014, January 17. Available from: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2014–01–16/angellist-the-social-network-for-startups.
55. The Economist. (2014). From leafy to lofty: Venture capital is adapting itself to the new startup landscape. [Online] available at https://www.economist.com/special-report/2014/01/16/from-leafy-to-lofty
56. Burtch G, Ghose A, Wattal S. An empirical examination of users’ information hiding in a crowdfunding context. International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS 2013): Reshaping Society through Information Systems Design. Vol. 1; 2013b. p. 343–61.
57. Gleasure R, Feller J. Does heart or head rule donor behaviors in charitable crowdfunding markets? Int J Electron Com. 2016;4415(June).
58. Fleming L, Sorenson O. Financing by and for the masses: an introduction to the special issue on crowdfunding. Calif Manag Rev. 2016;58(2):5–19. doi: 10.1525/cmr.2016.58.2.5.
59. Mollick E, Robb A. Democratizing innovation and capital access: The Role of Crowdfunding. Calif Manag Rev. 2016;58(2):72–87. doi: 10.1525/cmr.2016.58.2.72.
60. McCracken H. Crowd capitalism. Fast company; 2015. Available from: https://ejwl.idm.oclc.org.
61. Assenova V, Best J, Cagney M, Ellenoff D, Karas K, Moon J, Neiss S, Suber R, Sorenson O. The present and future of crowdfunding. Calif Manag Rev. 2016;58(2):125–35. doi: 10.1525/cmr.2016.58.2.125.
62. Zhang B, Baeck P, Ziegler T, Bone J, Garvey K. Pushing boundaries: the 2015 UK Alternative Finance Industry Report (February). Vol. 56; 2016.
63. Zhang B, Ziegler T, Mammadova L, Johanson D, Gray M, Yerolemou N. The 5th UK Alternative Finance Industry Report; 2018.
64. Financial Conduct Authority. Crowdfunding and authorisation; 2018.
65. Baeck P, Collins L, Zhang B. Understanding Alternative Finance—the UK alternative finance Industry report 2014; 2014.
66. Wardrop R, Zhang B, Rau R, Gray M. Moving mainstream—the European alternative finance benchmarking report; 2015. Available from: http://www.jbs.cam.ac.uk/index.php?id=6481#.VTOtICGqpBd.
67. Kshetri N. Success of crowd-based online technology in fundraising: an institutional perspective. J Int Manag. 2015;21(2):100–16. doi: 10.1016/j.intman.2015.03.004..
68. Lin M, Viswanathan S. Home bias in online investments: an empirical study of an online crowdfunding market. Management Science. 2016;62(5):1393–414. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.2015.2206.
69. Lin Y, Lee W-C, Chang C-CH. Analysis of rewards on reward-based crowdfunding platforms. In: IEEE/ACM International conferences; 2016.
70. Kraus S, Richter C, Brem A, Cheng C-F, Chang M-L. Strategies for reward-based crowdfunding campaigns. J Innov Knowl. 2016;1(1):13–23. doi: 10.1016/j.jik.2016.01.010.
71. Whitbeck JB. The JOBS act of 2012: the struggle between capital formation and investor protections. SSRN Journal. 2012. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2149744.
72. Stemler AR. The JOBS Act and crowdfunding: harnessing the power—and money—of the masses. Bus Horiz. 2013;56(3):271–5. doi: 10.1016/j.bushor.2013.01.007.
73. Financial Conduct Authority. A review of the regulatory regime for crowdfunding and the promotion of non-readily realisable securities by other media. Financial Conduct Authority; 2015.
74. Sharman A. UK’s new finance regulations face their first big test in crowdfunding. Financial Times; 2014, October 7.
75. Belleflamme P, Omrani N, Peitz M. The economics of crowdfunding platforms. Inf Econ Policy. 2015;33:11–28. doi: 10.1016/j.infoecopol.2015.08.003.
76. Gregory M. The start-ups struggling to make a name through crowdfunding; 2013. Available from: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-25403081.
77. Bi S, Liu Z, Usman K. The influence of online information on investing decisions of reward-based crowdfunding. J Bus Res. 2017;71:10–8.
78. Hou J, Wang N, Ge S. Antecedents of crowdfunding project success: an empirical study; 2015.
79. Li E, Martin JS. Capital formation and financial intermediation: the role of entrepreneur reputation formation. J Corp Fin. 2016.
80. Galuszka P, Bystrov V. The rise of fanvestors: A study of a crowdfunding community. FM. 2014. doi: 10.5210/fm.v19i5.4117.
81. Hossain M, Oparaocha GO. Crowdfunding: motives, definitions, typology and ethical challenges. Entrep Res J. 2017;7(2). doi: 10.1515/erj-2015–0045.
82. Steigenberger N. Why supporters contribute to reward-based crowdfunding. Int J Entrep Behav Res. 2017;23(2):336–53. doi: 10.1108/IJEBR-04–2016–0117


Regular Issue Open Access Article
Volume 4
Issue 1
Received September 23, 2021
Accepted September 29, 2021
Published October 8, 2021