Configuring Connectivity: Cisco Packet Tracer DHCP Server Best Practices

Year : 2024 | Volume :01 | Issue : 01 | Page : 29-35
By

    Sanskruti Karnewaer

  1. Sushil Bakhtar

  1. Student, Department of Electronics and Telecommunication, Prof Ram Meghe College of Engineering and Management, Amravati, Maharashtra, India
  2. Assistant Professor, Department of Electronics and Telecommunication, Prof Ram Meghe College of Engineering and Management, Amravati, Maharashtra, India

Abstract

In internet protocol (IP) networks, the dynamic host configuration protocol, or DHCP, is a network administration protocol that uses an architecture based on clients and servers to dynamically allocate internet protocol (IP) addresses and other interface characteristics to devices that are connected to the network. It explains routing between the ISP and the campus router uses a static route between the ISP and the gateway, and a default route between the gateway and the ISP. The loopback function domain on the ISP router identifies the ISP connection to the World Wide Web. You can use any router that satisfies the interface criteria. This covers the subsequent items and all conceivable pairings of them: 800, 1600, 1700, 2500 and 2600 series routers and identified the interface identifiers to be used based on the equipment in the lab. The configuration output used in this lab is produced from 1721 series routers. Any other router used may produce slightly different output. conduct the following steps on each router unless specifically instructed otherwise.

Keywords: DHCP protocol, IP address, router, server, diffserv codepoints

[This article belongs to International Journal of Satellite Remote Sensing(ijsrs)]

How to cite this article: Sanskruti Karnewaer, Sushil Bakhtar , Configuring Connectivity: Cisco Packet Tracer DHCP Server Best Practices ijsrs 2024; 01:29-35
How to cite this URL: Sanskruti Karnewaer, Sushil Bakhtar , Configuring Connectivity: Cisco Packet Tracer DHCP Server Best Practices ijsrs 2024 {cited 2024 Jan 29};01:29-35. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/ijsrs/article=2024/view=131790


Browse Figures

References

1.  Nichols K, Blake S, Baker F, Black D. Definition of the differentiated services field (DS field) in the IPv4 and IPv6 headers. 1998 Dec.

2.  R. Geib, D. Black, Diffserv-interconnection classes, and practice, 2017, (RFC 8100 (Informational)). (2017-03-09). [Online]. Available from https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc8100/

  1. McQuistin, C.S. Perkins, Is explicit congestion notification usable with UDP? IMC ’15: Proceedings of the 2015 Internet Measurement Conference October 2015. Pages 63–69. https://doi.org/10.1145/2815675.2815716
  2. AT&T, Class of service data collection document for AT&T managed internet service (mis), 2010. https://carecentral.att.com/downloads/Class_of_Service.pdf
  3. Brice Augustin, Xavier Cuvellier, Benjamin Orgogozo, Fabien Viger, Timur Friedman, Matthieu Latapy, Clémence Magnien, Renata Teixeira. Avoiding traceroute anomalies with Paris traceroute. IMC ’06: Proceedings of the 6th ACM SIGCOMM conference on Internet measurement October 2006; Pages 153–158. ACM Digital Library. https://doi.org/10.1145/1177080.1177100
  4. Bless, K. Nichols, K. Wehrle, A lower effort per-domain behavior (PDB) for differentiated services, 2003, RFC 3662 (IETF). The Internet Society (2003). [Online]. Available from https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3662
  5. Terzis, B. Braden, S. Vincent, L. Zhang, RSVP diagnostic messages, 2000, (RFC 2745). (Proposed Standard))
  6. Flach, E. Katz-Bassett, R. Govindan, Quantifying violations of destination-based for-warding on the internet, in: Proc. of ACM IMC’12, Boston (USA), pp. 265–272.
  7. R. Learmonth, A. Lutu, G. Fairhurst, D. Ros, Ö. Alay, Path transparency measurements from the mobile edge with PATHspider, in: Proc. of IEEE/IFIP TMA’17, Dublin, pp. 1–6
  8. Murray, T. Koziniek, The state of enterprise network traffic in 2012, in: IEEE APCC 2012, Berlin, pp. 179–184
  9. Detal G, Hesmans B, Bonaventure O, Vanaubel Y, Donnet B. Revealing middlebox interference with tracebox. In Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Internet measurement conference 2013 Oct 23 (pp. 1-8).

Regular Issue Subscription Original Research
Volume 01
Issue 01
Received August 22, 2023
Accepted December 12, 2023
Published January 29, 2024