An Interoperability on the Internet of Things (IoT): A Review

Year : 2023 | Volume : 01 | Issue : 01 | Page : 40-53
By

    Chaitali A. Chate

  1. Sanjeev S. Sannakki

  2. Vijay S. Rajpurohit

  1. Student, Department of Computer Science, KLS Gogte Institute of Technology, Belgaum, Karnataka, India
  2. Student, Department of Computer Science, KLS Gogte Institute of Technology, Belgaum, Karnataka, India
  3. Student, Department of Computer Science, KLS Gogte Institute of Technology, Belgaum, Karnataka, India

Abstract

With technological advancement growing at a rapid rate, we are presented with numerous ways of connecting ourselves to the rest of the world. The Internet of Things, or IoT, is now a reality, even at the minuscule level. With ubiquitous computing, we can stay in constant communication with the outside world. As such there are several types of devices capable of monitoring, measuring, and sending data back and forth from the web. These various devices use different types of communication models; and data models are heterogeneous in nature, and are not interoperable. To have truly seamless communication between heterogeneous devices, an interoperable environment is necessary. We discuss the interoperability problem in IoT devices, and its related issues and identify the research gaps, present a problem statement, and propose objectives and methodology that serve as a guide for future work.

Keywords: Internet of Things, interoperability, data analytics, wireless sensor networks, cybersecurity

[This article belongs to International Journal of Radio Frequency Innovations(ijrfi)]

How to cite this article: Chaitali A. Chate, Sanjeev S. Sannakki, Vijay S. Rajpurohit An Interoperability on the Internet of Things (IoT): A Review ijrfi 2023; 01:40-53
How to cite this URL: Chaitali A. Chate, Sanjeev S. Sannakki, Vijay S. Rajpurohit An Interoperability on the Internet of Things (IoT): A Review ijrfi 2023 {cited 2023 Oct 23};01:40-53. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/ijrfi/article=2023/view=130893

Browse Figures

References

Noura Mahda, Mohammed Atiquzzaman, Martin Gaedke. Interoperability in Internet of Things: Taxonomies and Open Challenges. Mob Netw Appl. 2019; 24(3): 796–809
van der Veer H, Wiles Achieving Technical Interoperability – the ETSI Approach. ETSI White Paper No.3. 3rd Edn. France: European Telecommunications Standards Institute; 2008 Apr.
Velosa A, Natis YV, Pezzini M, Lheureux B, Goodness (2015 Jul 2). Gartner’s Market Guide for IoT Platforms. [Online]. Available at: https://www.gartner. com/doc/3086918/market-guide- iot-platforms
Vermesan Ovidiu, Jacoby Advancing IoT Platforms Interoperability. New York: River Publishers; 2018. 10.13052/rp-9788770220057
Bröring A, Schmid S, Schindhelm C-K, Khelil Enabling IoT Ecosystems through Platform Interoperability. IEEE Softw. 2017; 34(1): 54–61.
Merrian-Webster. Merrian-Webster dictionary. [Online].Available at: https://www.merriam- webster. com/dictionary/semantics.
Noy Ontology Development 101: A Guide to Creating Your First Ontology. Stanford, CA: Stanford University; 2001.
Jacoby Michael, Antonić Aleksandar, Kreiner Karl, Łapacz Roman, Lampert (2017). Semantic Interoperability as Key to IoT Platform Federation. Interoperability and Open-Source Solutions for the Internet of Things. 2016; 3–19. 10.1007/978-3-319-56877-5_1.
Zivkovic Carna, Guan Yajuan, Grimm Christoph, editor IoT Platforms, Use Cases, Privacy, and Business Models: With Hands-on Examples Based on the VICINITY Platform. Springer; 2020Sep; 227.
Matthys N, Yang F, Daniels W, Joosen W, Hughes Demonstration of MicroPnP: The Zero-Configuration Wireless Sensing and Actuation Platform. 2016 13th Annual IEEE International Conference on Sensing, Communication, and Networking (SECON). 2016; 1–2. doi: 10.1109/SAHCN.2016.7732982.
Khaled AE, Helal A, Lindquist W, Lee IoT- DDL–Device Description Language for the “T” in IoT. IEEE Access. 2018; 6: 24048–24063. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2825295.
SEMIoTICS Deliverable D4.4 Semantic Interoperability Mechanisms for IoT (first draft). (n.d.). Available at: https://www.semiotics-project.eu/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/SEMIoTICS-D4.4_revised.pdf.
Rashmika Nawaratne, Damminda Alahakoon, Daswin De Silva, Prem Chhetri, Naveen Chilamkurti. Self-evolving intelligent algorithms for facilitating data interoperability in IoT environments. Future Gener Comput Syst. 2018; 86: 421–432. ISSN 0167-739X,
Rahmani Rahim, Firouzi Gateway controller with deep sensing: learning to be autonomic in intelligent internet of things. Int J Commun Netw Distrib Syst. 2021; 26(1): 1–29. 10.1504/IJCNDS.2021.111631.
Kotstein Sebastian, Decker Reinforcement Learning for IoT Interoperability. 2019 IEEE International Conference on Software Architecture Companion (ICSA-C), Hamburg, Germany. 2019; 11–18. 10.1109/ICSA-C.2019.00010.
Klöser Sebastian, Kotstein Sebastian, Reuben Robin, Zerrer Timo, Decker Deep Reinforcement Learning for IoT Interoperability. In: Advances in Automotive Production Technology: Theory and Application. ARENA2036. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Vieweg; 2021. 10.13140/RG.2.2.36301.26087.
Sohail Jabbar, Farhan Ullah, Shehzad Khalid, Murad Khan, Kijun Han. Semantic Interoperability in Heterogeneous IoT Infrastructure for Healthcare. Wirel Commun Mob Comput. 2017; 2017: Article ID 9731806(10p). https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/9731 806
Thierry G, Zoraida C, David G, Michael M, Debopam Natural Language for an Interoperable Internet of Simple Things. 2019 IEEE 5th World Forum on Internet of Things (WF-IoT), Limerick, Ireland. 2019; 474–479. doi: 10.1109/WF-IoT.2019.8767215
Guo K, Lu Y, Gao H, Cao R. Artificial Intelligence-Based Semantic Internet of Things in a User-Centric Smart City. Sensors (Basel). 2018; 18(5): Published 2018 Apr 26. doi:10.3390/s18051341
Ahmed Iyanda Sulyman, Oteafy Sharief MA, Hassanein Hossam S. Expanding the Cellular-IoT Umbrella: An Architectural Approach. IEEE Wirel Commun. 2017 Jun; 24(3): 66–71.
Martinez-Julia Pedro, Skarmeta Empowering the Internet of Things with Software Defined Networking (WHITE PAPER). 2014.
Bedhief I, Kassar M, Aguili SDN-based architecture challenging the IoT heterogeneity. 2016 3rd Smart Cloud Networks & Systems (SCNS), Dubai, United Arab Emirates. 2016; 1–3. doi: 10.1109/SCNS.2016.7870558.
oneM2M Sets Standards For The Internet Of Things & M2M [Internet]. Onem2m.org. 2023 [cited 2023 Oct 17]. Available from: https://www.onem2m.org/
OMA LwM2M – Brief description — Anjay 3.6.0 documentation [Internet]. Github.io. 2017 [cited 2023 Oct 17]. Available from: https://avsystem.github.io/Anjay-doc/LwM2M.html
https://iot.ieee.org/newsletter/january-2016/hypercat- resource-discovery-on-the-internet-of-things.html
OCF – AllJoyn [Internet]. Open Connectivity Foundation (OCF). 2018 [cited 2023 Oct 17]. Available from: https://openconnectivity.org/technology/reference-%20implementation/alljoyn/
https://www.slideshare.net/alexgonzalezgarcia/introduction- to-alljoyn
OCF – IoTivity [Internet]. Open Connectivity Foundation (OCF). 2020 [cited 2023 Oct 17]. Available from: https://openconnectivity.org/technology/iotivity/
IoTivity. (2023). IoTivity. [online] Available at: http://iotivity.org/.
Openconnectivity Foundation. (2023 Nov). OCF Bridging Framework Specification. https://openconnectivity.org/specs/OCF_Bridging_Specificapdf


Regular Issue Subscription Review Article
Volume 01
Issue 01
Received July 27, 2023
Accepted September 1, 2023
Published October 23, 2023