Advancing Automotive Design Through Virtual Prototyping and Finite Element Analysis

Year : 2023 | Volume : 01 | Issue : 01 | Page : 7-12
By

    Nishant Varshney

  1. Student, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Amity University, Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India

Abstract

Finite element analysis (FEA) and virtual prototyping are being incorporated, which is transforming the automotive sector. The design process is being revolutionized by emerging technologies, as this essay discusses, leading to automobiles that are more innovative safe, and efficient. With the help of virtual prototyping, engineers may construct, evolve, and optimize vehicle designs in an electronic environment, saving a lot of time and resources. This strategy is further enhanced using finite element analysis (FEA), which simulates structural behavior and stresses and enables engineers to improve safety, the choice of materials, and overall vehicle performance. The study demonstrates the complementary link between FEA and virtual prototyping, highlighting their combined influence on multidisciplinary teamwork, iterative design, and case-specific solutions. Real-world examples make it obvious how these technologies are altering the automotive industry’s landscape by paving the way for a future filled with rapid development and cutting-edge designs.

Keywords: FEA, Prototyping, Manufacturing, Design, Vehicle

[This article belongs to International Journal of Machine Systems and Manufacturing Technology(ijmsmt)]

How to cite this article: Nishant Varshney Advancing Automotive Design Through Virtual Prototyping and Finite Element Analysis ijmsmt 2023; 01:7-12
How to cite this URL: Nishant Varshney Advancing Automotive Design Through Virtual Prototyping and Finite Element Analysis ijmsmt 2023 {cited 2023 Dec 30};01:7-12. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/ijmsmt/article=2023/view=130193

Browse Figures

References

  1. Roper, S. et al., 2016. The roles and effectiveness of design in new product development: A study of Irish manufacturers. Research Policy, 45(1).
  2. Byggeth, S., Hochschorner, E., 2006. Handling trade-offs in Ecodesign tools for sustainable product development and procurement. Journal of Cleaner Production 14, 1420-1430
  3. Babaian, Sharon (1998). The Most Benevolent Machine: A Historical Assessment of Cycles in Canada. Ottawa: National Museum of Science and Technology. p. 97. ISBN 0660916703.
  4. Swales, Neville (21 October 2011). “Designing the XJ13”. xj13.eu. Archived from the original on 24 October 2016. Retrieved 9 January 2014.
  5. Bell, Jonathan (2003). Concept Car Design: Driving the Dream. Rotovision. p. 67. ISBN 978-2-88046-564-3. Retrieved 9 January 2014.
  6. Winter, Drew (1 May 1996). “The men behind the magic”. Ward’s AutoWorld. Archived from the original on 28 July 2011. Retrieved 9 January 2014.
  7. Srinivasan, H., R. Figueroa, et al. (1999). “Selective disassembly for virtual prototyping as applied to de-manufacturing.” Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 15(3): 231-245.
  8. Tseng, M. M., J. Jiao, et al. (1998). “Virtual prototyping for customized product development.” Integrated Manufacturing Systems 9(6): 334-343.
  9. Venables M. (2006). “Better by design.” Manufacturing Engineer 85(3): 24-27.
  10. Wang, L., W. Shen, et al. (2002). “Collaborative conceptual design-State of the art and future trends.” Computer Aided design 34

Regular Issue Subscription Review Article
Volume 01
Issue 01
Received August 11, 2023
Accepted August 26, 2023
Published December 30, 2023