Adverse Effects of Copper Extraction on the Environment and Living Things

Open Access

Year : 2022 | Volume : | Issue : 1 | Page : 10-15

    Rishikesh Tiwari

  1. Student, Ashoka Institute of Technology and Management, Uttar Pradesh, India


The extraction procedures are known as heap and situ leaching; throughout these procedures, particles react with one another to produce acidic mists that not only hurt people’s skin, eyes, and lungs but also ruin crops, degrade the quality of the land, and injure surrounding structures. It tastes awful and stinks like acid dust. The ore typically needs to be beneficiated as with all mining processes. The methods of processing are determined by the type of ore. The ore is crushed and milled to separate the valuable minerals from the unwanted minerals if the ore is predominantly composed of sulphide copper minerals. Mineral flotation is then used to concentrate it. Even while some sizable mines have smelters close by, the concentrate is normally sold to far-off smelters next. When smaller smelters could be profitable, this collocation of mine and smelters was more common in the 19th and early 20th centuries. Only a minor portion of copper is present in the majority of copper ores. Gangue, which has no commercial value, makes up the remaining ore typically; exploration and extraction gangue contains oxides and silicate minerals. The technology for retrieving copper has advanced, and in certain cases, these tailings have been retracted. The typical copper content in copper ores nowadays is less than 0.6 percent copper, and minimum of 2% of the entire volume of the ore rock is made up of economically valuable ore minerals including copper. The separation of ore minerals from rock gangue minerals is a crucial goal in the metallurgical processing of any ore.

Keywords: Copper, environmental impact, extraction, metallurgical, mining

[This article belongs to International Journal of Metallurgy and Alloys(ijma)]

How to cite this article: Rishikesh Tiwari Adverse Effects of Copper Extraction on the Environment and Living Things ijma 2022; 8:10-15
How to cite this URL: Rishikesh Tiwari Adverse Effects of Copper Extraction on the Environment and Living Things ijma 2022 {cited 2022 Jun 28};8:10-15. Available from:

Full Text PDF Download

Browse Figures


1. Sardar K, Ali S, Hameed S, Afzal S, Fatima S, Shakoor MB, Bharwana SA, Tauqeer HM. Heavy metals contamination and what are the impacts on living organisms. Greener Journal of Environmental Management and Public Safety. Aug 2013; 2(4): 172–179.
2. Baby J, Raj JS, Biby ET, Sankarganesh P, Jeevitha MV, Ajisha SU, Rajan SS. Toxic effect of heavy metals on aquatic environment. International Journal of Biological and Chemical Sciences. 2010; 4(4).
3. He ZL, Yang XE, Stoffella PJ. Trace elements in agroecosystems and impacts on the environment. Journal of Trace elements in Medicine and Biology. Dec 2005; 19(2–3): 125–140.
4. Cullberg G, Larsson B. Some adverse effects of copper-iud. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica. Jan 1979; 58(1): 87–89.
5. Yang Z, Rui-Lin M, Wang-Dong N, Hui W. Selective leaching of base metals from copper smelter slag. Hydrometallurgy. Jun 2010; 103(1–4): 25–29.
6. Dudka S, Adriano DC. Environmental impacts of metal ore mining and processing: A review. Journal of Environmental Quality. May 1997; 26(3): 590–602.
7. Blowes DW. The environmental effects of mine wastes. In Proceedings of exploration 1997 (Vol. 97, pp. 887–892.
8. Ahmari S, Zhang L. Production of eco-friendly bricks from copper mine tailings through geopolymerization. Construction and Building Materials. Apr 2012; 29: 323–331.
9. Correa JA, Castilla JC, Ramírez M, Varas M, Lagos N, Vergara S, Moenne A, Román D, Brown MT. Copper, copper mine tailings, and their effect on marine algae in northern Chile. In Sixteenth International Seaweed Symposium 1999 (pp. 571–581). Springer, Dordrecht.
10. Yang J, Pan X, Zhao C, Mou S, Achal V, Al-Misned FA, Mortuza MG, Gadd GM. Bioimmobilization of heavy metals in acidic copper mine tailings soil. Geomicrobiology Journal. Mar 2016; 33(3–4): 261–266.

Regular Issue Open Access Article
Volume 8
Issue 1
Received May 28, 2022
Accepted June 7, 2022
Published June 28, 2022