[{“box”:0,”content”:”[user_role]
The spatial characteristics of an office space play a fundamental role in contributing to the performance of the employees who use the office space. An efficient and functional workspace should be designed to cater to the needs of employees as this is critical to their performance as well. Studies from various authors have shown that better results and outcomes are gotten from employees who are satisfied with their workspaces. Although in recent times, the spatial configuration of the workspace has proven to be insufficient as employees are seen to be less productive. This paper aims to assess workspace performance by identifying the spatial characteristics of the spaces employees work. This will be achieved by categorizing the workspace by its makeup. The paper assessed six (6) office buildings where 105 different office types were observed. Qualitative data was gotten and descriptively analysed. The result showed two major domains characterized by the offices in Lagos; physical and functional domains.
‘>n n n n [foreach 286][/foreach]n n n n <meta name=DC.Description xml:lang=en content='
The spatial characteristics of an office space play a fundamental role in contributing to the performance of the employees who use the office space. An efficient and functional workspace should be designed to cater to the needs of employees as this is critical to their performance as well. Studies from various authors have shown that better results and outcomes are gotten from employees who are satisfied with their workspaces. Although in recent times, the spatial configuration of the workspace has proven to be insufficient as employees are seen to be less productive. This paper aims to assess workspace performance by identifying the spatial characteristics of the spaces employees work. This will be achieved by categorizing the workspace by its makeup. The paper assessed six (6) office buildings where 105 different office types were observed. Qualitative data was gotten and descriptively analysed. The result showed two major domains characterized by the offices in Lagos; physical and functional domains.
‘>n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n <meta property=og:description content='Request PDF |
The spatial characteristics of an office space play a fundamental role in contributing to the performance of the employees who use the office space. An efficient and functional workspace should be designed to cater to the needs of employees as this is critical to their performance as well. Studies from various authors have shown that better results and outcomes are gotten from employees who are satisfied with their workspaces. Although in recent times, the spatial configuration of the workspace has proven to be insufficient as employees are seen to be less productive. This paper aims to assess workspace performance by identifying the spatial characteristics of the spaces employees work. This will be achieved by categorizing the workspace by its makeup. The paper assessed six (6) office buildings where 105 different office types were observed. Qualitative data was gotten and descriptively analysed. The result showed two major domains characterized by the offices in Lagos; physical and functional domains.
‘>n n n n n n n n
n
n
- [foreach 286]n
n
Deborah Oluwabunmi Alonge, Stella Zubairu, Isa Bala Muhammad
n
n [/foreach]
n
- [foreach 286] [if 1175 not_equal=””]n
- Lecturer, Lecturer, PhD Supervisor,Federal University of Technology, Federal University of Technology, Federal University of Technology,Niger state, Minna, Niger state, Minna, Niger state,Nigeria, Nigeria, Nigeria
n [/if 1175][/foreach]
n
n
n
Abstract
n
The spatial characteristics of an office space play a fundamental role in contributing to the performance of the employees who use the office space. An efficient and functional workspace should be designed to cater to the needs of employees as this is critical to their performance as well. Studies from various authors have shown that better results and outcomes are gotten from employees who are satisfied with their workspaces. Although in recent times, the spatial configuration of the workspace has proven to be insufficient as employees are seen to be less productive. This paper aims to assess workspace performance by identifying the spatial characteristics of the spaces employees work. This will be achieved by categorizing the workspace by its makeup. The paper assessed six (6) office buildings where 105 different office types were observed. Qualitative data was gotten and descriptively analysed. The result showed two major domains characterized by the offices in Lagos; physical and functional domains.
n
Keywords: Office building, Performance, Spatial Characteristics, Utilisation, Workspace
n [if 424 equals=”Regular Issue”][This article belongs to International Journal of Environmental Planning and Development Architecture(ijepda)]
n
n
n
n
nnnvar fieldValue = “[user_role]”;nif (fieldValue === ‘indexingbodies’) {n document.write(‘‘);n} else if (fieldValue === ‘administrator’) {n document.write(‘‘);n}else if (fieldValue === ‘ijepda’) {n document.write(‘‘);n} else {n document.write(‘ ‘);n}nn [if 992 equals=”Subscription”]n
Full Text
n
nn[/if 992]n[if 992 not_equal=”Subscription”]n
n
n
[/if 992]n [if 379 not_equal=””]
Browse Figures
n
[/if 379]n
References
n [if 1104 equals=””]n
1. Adedayo, O. F., Anunobi, A. I., Oyetola, S. A., Adebayo, O.A., & Odine, L. C. (2015). User Satisfaction with Space Flexibility in offices of selected tertiary institutions in Niger state, Nigeria. In: Laryea, S. and Leiringer R. (Eds) Proceedings 6th West Africa Built Environment Research (WABER) Conference, Accra Ghana,1185-1200.
2. Allen, T. (1977). Managing the Flow of Technology, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
3. Alonge, D. O., Ayoola, A. R., & Muhammad, I. B. (2022). Factors that Influence Workspace Planning and Design in Government Offices Buildings of Lagos.
4. Becker, F., & Kelley, T. (2004). Offices at Work: Uncommon Workspace Strategies that add Value and Improve Performance. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
5. Charles. K., & Veitch, J. (2002). Environmental satisfaction in open-plan environments: Effects of workstation size, partition height and windows. Report for National Research Council of Canada, Institute for Research in Construction, Ottawa, ON.
6. Christina, B. D. (2007) The Office: An Explorative Study; Architectural Design’s Impact on Health, Job Satisfaction & Well-being. A PhD Dissertation from KNT School of Architecture, Stockholm, Sweden.
7. Creswell, J.W. (2014). Research Designing: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods. 4th Edition, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, Califonia.
8. De Been, I. & Beijer, M. (2014). The influence of office type on satisfaction and perceived productivity support. Journal of Facilities Management, 12(2), 142-157.
9. Dean, L., Pugh, W., & Gunderson, E. (1975). Spatial and perceptual components of crowding: effects on health and satisfaction. Environment and Behavior, 7 225-236.
10. Fried, Y., Slowik, L., Ben-David, H., & Tiegs, R. (2001). Exploring the relationship between workspace density and employee attitudinal reactions: an integrative model. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 74, 359-372.
11. Gullahorn, J. T. (1952). Distance and Friendship as Factors in the Gross Interaction Matrix. Sociometry, 15, 123–134. https://doi.org/10.2307/2785450
12. Hassanain, M. A. (2010). Analysis of Factors Influencing Office Workplace Planning and Design in Corporate Facilities. Journal of Building Appraisal. 6(2): 183-197.
13. Hua, Y., Loftness, V., Heerwagen, J. H. and Powell, K. M. (2011). Relationship between Workplace Spatial Set-Tings and Occupant-Perceived Support for Collaboration. Environment and Behavior, 43, 807-826.
14. Ibrahim, I., Yusoff, W. Z., Bilal, K. (2012). Space Management: A Study on Space Usage Level in Higher Education Institutions. Social and Behavioral Sciences 47, 1880 – 1887.
15. Jing, L. (2015). An Investigation of Workplace Characteristics Influencing Knowledge Worker’s Sense of Belonging and Organizational Outcomes. PhD Dissertation.
16. Kniffin, K.M., Anseel, F., Bamberger, P.A., Antonakis, J., & Bapuji, H. (2020). COVID-19 and the Workplace: Implications, Issues, and Insights for Future Research and Action. Researchgate publication, DOI: 10.31234.
17. Kraut, R., & Streeter, L. (1995). Coordination in Largescale Software Development. Communications of the ACM, 38(3), 69-81.
18. Kraut, R., Fussell, S., Brennan, S., & Siegel, J. (2002). Understanding Effects of Proximity on Collaboration: Implications for Technologies to Support Remote Collaborative Work, In Distributed Work Eds P Hinds, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 37-162
19. May, D., Oldham, G., & Rathert, C. (2005). Employee affective and behavioural reactions to the spatial density of physical work environments. Human Resource Management, 44, 21-33.
20. Miles MB, Huberman AM. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. 2nd Sage; Thousand Oaks, CA: 1994.
21. Misoska, A. T, Miodraga, S.P., Misko, R., & Venera, K. H. (2014). Workspace as a Factor of Job Satisfaction in the Banking and ICT Industries in Macedonia. Serbian Journal of Management, 9 (2), 159 – 171
22. Nik Mohd, I. N., Abdul Hakim, M., Mat Naim, A., & Mohd, A. (2015). Office Space Study: A Review from Facilities Management Context. Journal Technology, ISSN 2180–3722. 75(10), 85– 96
23. O’Neill, M. J. (1994). Workspac adjustability, storage, and enclosure as predictors of employee reactions and performance. Environment and Behaviour, 26(4), 504–526.
24. Oldham, G. & Nancy, R. (1983). Relationships between Office Characteristics and Employee Reactions: A Study of the Physical Environment.” Administrative Science Quarterly. 28 (4), 542- 556.
25. Oldham, G. R., & Rotchford, N. L. (1983). Relationships between Office Characteristics and Employee Reactions: A Study of the Physical Environment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28(4), 542–556. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393008
26. Oldham, G., & Brass, D. (1979). Employee Reactions to an Open-Plan Office: A Naturally Occurring Quasi-Experiment. Administrative Science Quarterly. 24, 267-284.
27. Oldham, G., & Fried, Y. (1987). Employee Reactions to Workspace Characteristics. Journal of
Applied Psychology, 72 (1), 75-80.
28. Olson, J. S., Teasley, S., Covi, L., & Olson, G. (2002). The (currently) Unique Advantages of Collocated Work. Distributed work, 113-135.
29. O’Neill, M. J., & Carayon. P. (1993). The Relationship between Privacy, Control and Stress Responses in Office Workers, in Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 37th Annual Meeting, 479- 483.
30. Peponis, J., & Wineman, J. (2002). Spatial structure of environment and behaviour”, in Handbook of Environmental Psychology, JohnWiley, NewYork, 271-291.
31. Preiser, W. F. E., & Vischer, J.C. (2005). Assessing Building Performance. Oxford, England: Elsevier
32. Reed, R.G., & Wilkinson, S. J. (2005). The Increasing Importance of Sustainability for Building Ownership. Journal of corporate Real Estate. 4(7), 339-350
33. Sailer, K. (2010). The Space-Organisation Relationship on the Shape of the Relationship between Spatial Configuration and Collective. Organisational Behaviours.
34. Salama, A. M., & Courtney, L. (2013). The Impact of the Spatial Qualities of the Workplace on Architects’ Job Satisfaction. International Journal of Architectural Research, 7 (1), 52-64.
35. Schuler, R., Ritzman, L., Davis, V. (1981). Merging prescriptive and behavioural approaches for office layout. Journal of Operations Management, 1, 131-142.
36. Sullivan, M., & Barbara, F. T (2014). Workplace Design Trends. Building Design and Construction, Office Spaces. Aia continuing education. 40-47.
37. Sundstrom, E., Burt, R., & Kamp, K. (1980). Privacy at Work: Architectural Correlates of Job Satisfaction and Job Performance. Academy of Management Journal. 23(1), 101-117
38. Veitch, J. A., Charles, K. E., Newsham, G. R., Marquardt, C.J.G. & Geerts, J. (2003). Environmental satisfaction in open-plan environments: 5 workstation and physical condition effects. Ottawa: National Research Council Canada, Institute for Research in Construction.
39. Vischer, J. C. (2008). Towards an Environmental Psychology of Workspace: How People Are Affected by Environments for Work. Architectural Science Review, 51(2), 97-108. Assessing Workspaces of Office Buildings: A Case of Lagos Office Spatial Characteristics Alonge et al.
40. Waber, B., Magnolfi, J., & Lindsay, G. (2014). Workspaces that move people. Havard Business Review, 92(10), 68-77.
41. Ying, H. (2007). Designing for Open – Plan Workplaces for Collaboration: An Exploration of the Impact of Workplace Spatial Settings on Space Perception and Collaboration Effectiveness. School of Architecture, Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh.
42. Zoltan, E. Sz. (2014). Office spaces for more innovation and space efficiency. International Journal for Engineering and Information Sciences, 9(2), 67-76.
n [/if 1104][if 1104 not_equal=””]n
- [foreach 1102]n
- [if 1106 equals=””], [/if 1106][if 1106 not_equal=””],[/if 1106]
n [/foreach]
n [/if 1104]
n
n [if 1114 equals=”Yes”]n
n [/if 1114]
n
n
n
International Journal of Environmental Planning and Development Architecture
n
n
n
n
n
n
| Volume | 01 |
| Issue | 02 |
| Received | April 22, 2023 |
| Accepted | May 4, 2023 |
| Published | May 10, 2023 |
n
n
[/foreach]
n[/if 1190]n[if 1177 not_equal=””]n
n
[/foreach]
n [/if 1177]n
n
n n .post-views{n text-align: center;n }n .ALLreveiwers img,.ALLeditors img{n width: 50px;n height: 50px;n border-radius: 50px;n margin: 10px;n }n .ALLreveiwers,.ALLeditors{n border-bottom:1px solid black;n }n .modaltext{color:white; padding: 0px 30px 0px 30px; text-decoration:none;}n .modaltext:hover{color:black background-color:rgb(255 221 204); color:black;}n .modal-content{ margin-top: 50%;}n n Editn n function myfun() {n x=document.getElementById(“editor”);n y=document.getElementById(“down”);n z=document.getElementById(“up”);n if(x.style.display==”none”){n x.style.display=”block”;n }n else {n x.style.display=”none”;n }n if(y.style.display==”none”){n y.style.display=”block”;n }n else {n y.style.display=”none”;n }n if(z.style.display==”none”){n z.style.display=”block”;n }n else {n z.style.display=”none”;n }n }n function myfun2() {n x=document.getElementById(“reviewer”);n y=document.getElementById(“down2”);n z=document.getElementById(“up2″);n if(x.style.display==”none”){n x.style.display=”block”;n }n else {n x.style.display=”none”;n }n if(y.style.display==”none”){n y.style.display=”block”;n }n else {n y.style.display=”none”;n }n if(z.style.display==”none”){n z.style.display=”block”;n }n else {n z.style.display=”none”;n }n }n n table, tr, td{n padding: 10px;n border: none;n }n
n
n
“}]