Open Access
Rushikesh Meher
Girish Joshi
- Student G H Raisoni College of Engineering and Management Pune, Maharashtra India
- Professor G H Raisoni College of Engineering and Management Pune, Maharashtra India
Abstract
The design philosophy of the strong-column weak-beam (SCWB) in which plastic flexibility is allowed to occur only in beams while the expanded columns are widely accepted in the independent earthquake design codes of steel. Under this method of harvesting, earthquake power is dispersed mainly by plastic hinges on beams and columns. The plastic strength of flexible beams and column bases can greatly affect the response of the SCWB framework. During the lasting earthquake, the plastic columns are more important than the beam gaps that cause damage to the global structure and the high risk of life. All parts of the structure transfer their power through the column and the column shares it with the base and soil, so you can imagine if the column fails to form, all of it could fall into this fragile weak concept of the column.
Keywords: ETABS, pushover analysis, RC frame buildings, strong-column weak-beam design
[This article belongs to International Journal of Construction Engineering and Planning(ijcep)]
Browse Figures
References
1. Mitesh Surana, Yogendra Singh, Dominik H Lang. Effect of strong column weak beam design provision on the seismic fragility of RC frame buildings. International Journal of Advanced Structural Engineering. 2018; 10(2): 131–141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40091-018-0187-z.
2. Mohd Moazzam Ali Irfani, A Vimala. Collapse mechanism of strong column weak beam buildings of varying heights. International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology (IJEAT). Oct. 2019; 9(1): 4144–4148.
3. N Subramanian, DS Prakash Rao. Seismic design of joints in RC structures-A review. Indian Concrete Journal. Feb. 2003; 77(2): 883–892.
4. Amit Kumar, Anant Kumar, Shyam Kishor Kumar, Krishna Murari. Analysis and capacity based earthquake resistant design of multi storeyed building. IOSR Journal of Engineering (IOSRJEN). Aug. 2014; 4(8): 07–13.
5. Yangbing Liu, Yuanxin Liao, Nina Zheng, Jingbo Liu. Analysis of strong column and weak beam behavior of steel-concrete mixed frames. 15th WCEE. Lisboa. 2012.
6. Ravi Avula Reddy Teja. Design of RC framed building considering MCRs recommended in various international codes. 2015. (Online Accessed). http://ethesis.nitrkl.ac.in/7476/1/2015 BTdesignReddy.pd.
7. JM Bracci, KL Dooley. Seismic evaluation of column-to-beam strength ratio in reinforced concrete frames. ACI Structural Journal. Nov.-Dec. 2001; 98(6): 843–851.
8. Liu Yangbing, Liao Yuanxin, Zheng Nina. Analysis of strong column and weak beam behavior of steel-concrete mixed frames. 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Lisboa. 2012.
9. Naik Pramodini, Annigeri Satish. Performance evaluation of 9 storey RC building located in North Goa. 11th International Symposium on Plasticity and Impact Mechanics, Implast 2016. Procedia Engineering. 2017; 173: 1841–1846.
10. Rita Bento, Mário Lopes. Evaluation of the need for weak beam-strong column design in dual frame-wall structures. 12th WCEE. Gongcheng Lixue/Engineering Mechanics. 2000; 27: 102–113.
11. Colleen Kirsten Cagurangan. Effects of Strong-Column Weak-Beam Ratios on Collapse Capacities of Tall Reinforced Concrete Moment Frame Structures. ProQuest LLC; 2015.
12. Abhijit Mistry. Column-to-Beam Moment Capacity Ratio of Framed Building [Thesis]. National Institute of Technology, Rourkela.
13. Thaviti Venkata Sai Kumar, M Narendra. Analysis and capacity based earthquake resistant design of multi bay multy stored 3D RCC frame. Journal of Interdisciplinary Cycle Research. July 2020; 12(7): 1202–1207.
14. KR Bindhu, PM Sukumar, KP Jaya. Performance of exterior beam-column joints under seismic type loading. ISET Journal of Earthquake Technology. June 2009; 46(2): 47–64.
15. Alok Krishnan, GD Ramtekkar. Effect of grade of concrete in shear strength of exterior beam column joint of reinforced concrete building. IJISET-International Journal of Innovative Science, Engineering & Technology. July 2020; 7(7): 424–432.
16. Bhave Priyanka, Banarase Mayur. Analysis and capacity based earthquake resistance design of multy bay multy storeyed residential building. Int. Journal of Engineering Research and Applications. April 2016; 6(4): 78–84.
17. Brijesh Shah, Nirav Patel, Sumant Patel. A comparative study of the ductile design of column based on new is 13920-2016 and old is 13920-1993. International Journal of Advance Research, Ideas and Innovations in Technology. 2018; 4(2): 2125–2132.
18. Tamal Ghosh, Sourav Gupta, Satyabrata Choudhury. A study on dynamic response of exterior RC beam-column joint. AIP Conference Proceedings. 2020. Available at: https://aip.scitation.org/doi/10.1063/5.0024483. [Accessed 2021].
19. FEMA 356. Pre-standard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. Reston VA: American Society of Civil Engineers; 2000.
20. IS 456 (2000). Indian standard—plain and reinforced concrete. Code of practice. Bureau of Indian Standards. New Delhi.
21. IS 1893 Part1 (2002). Indian standard criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures, part1: general provisions and buildings (fifth revision).Bureau of Indian Standards. New Delhi.
22. IS 1893 Part1 (2016). Indian standard criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures, part 1: general provisions and buildings (sixth revision). Bureau of Indian Standards. New Delhi.
23. IS13920 (2016). Ductile design and detail in reinforced concrete structures subjected to seismic forces—code of practice. Bureau of Indian Standards. New Delhi.
24. IS 875: Code of Practice for Design Loads For Buildings And Structures, Part 2. New Delhi (India): Bureau of Indian Standards; 1987.
International Journal of Construction Engineering and Planning
| Volume | 7 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Received | June 13, 2021 |
| Accepted | June 17, 2021 |
| Published | June 17, 2023 |