Interior Design for Disaster Resilience

Year : 2024 | Volume :01 | Issue : 01 | Page : 01-15
By

Devansh Pandey

Deepti Pande Rana

  1. Student Amity University, Lucknow Campus Uttar Pradesh India
  2. Associate Professor Amity University , Lucknow Campus Uttar Pradesh India

Abstract

In the age of heightening environment actuated calamities and the thriving intricacy of metropolitan scenes, the basic to implant catastrophe flexibility inside plan resounds with remarkable criticalness. This examination paper embraces a general odyssey, diving into the complicated interchange between inside plan and catastrophe flexibility inside the constructed climate. Drawing upon a tremendous embroidery of insightful writing, exact investigations, and genuine models, the paper fastidiously disentangles the multi-layered methodologies, developments, and intercessions that support tough inside plan. From the sensible determination of materials to the smart arrangement of spatial formats, the paper enlightens the heap manners by which inside planners can strengthen constructed conditions against the attack of debacles, guaranteeing the security, solace, and prosperity of tenants. Moreover, the paper explores the considerable hindrances blocking the far-reaching reception of catastrophe versatile plan rehearses, while at the same time diagramming a visionary direction towards development and interdisciplinary cooperative energy. At its quintessence, this exploration advocates for a change in outlook in inside plan — a shift established in all-encompassing stewardship, intense development, and unflinching obligation to the aggregate undertaking of protecting lives, supporting networks, and safeguarding the planet’s fragile balance. Highlighting a proactive stance, the study advocates for an anticipatory design framework in which evaluating risks and implementing disaster mitigation strategies are integrated into the core of the design process, rather than being secondary concerns. Consequently, this research not only urges for prompt action but also lays down a fundamental roadmap for forthcoming inquiries within the discipline.

Keywords: Inside plan, Fiasco flexibility, Assembled Climate, Plan methodologies, Interdisciplinary coordinated effort, Contextual investigations, Manageability, Environment transformation, and Metropolitan versatility.

[This article belongs to International Journal of Climate Conditions(ijcc)]

How to cite this article: Devansh Pandey, Deepti Pande Rana. Interior Design for Disaster Resilience. International Journal of Climate Conditions. 2024; 01(01):01-15.
How to cite this URL: Devansh Pandey, Deepti Pande Rana. Interior Design for Disaster Resilience. International Journal of Climate Conditions. 2024; 01(01):01-15. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/ijcc/article=2024/view=145901

References

  1. Berke P, Cooper J, Aminto M, Grabich S, Horney J. Adaptive planning for disaster recovery and resiliency: An evaluation of 87 local recovery plans in eight states. Journal of the American Planning Association. 2014 Oct 2;80(4):310-23.
  2. Axon S. Sustaining public engagement with addressing climate change and the role of social solutions. International Journal of Sustainable Society. 2016;8(3):185-205.
  3. Barton R, Jones D, Gilbert D. Strategic asset management incorporating ecologically sustainable development. Journal of Facilities Management. 2002 Jan 1;1(1):70-84.
  4. Birkmann J. Measuring vulnerability to promote disaster-resilient societies: Conceptual frameworks and definitions. Measuring vulnerability to natural hazards: Towards disaster resilient societies. 2006;1(9):3-7.
  5. Bashawri A, Garrity S, Moodley K. An overview of the design of disaster relief shelters. Procedia Economics and Finance. 2014 Jan 1;18:924-31.
  6. Reda Taha M, Ayyub BM, Soga K, Daghash S, Heras Murcia D, Moreu F, Soliman E. Emerging technologies for resilient infrastructure: Conspectus and roadmap. ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering. 2021 Jun 1;7(2):03121002.
  7. Nohrstedt D, Parker CF, von Uexkull N, Mård J, Albrecht F, Petrova K, Nyberg L, Göteman M, Hileman J, Messori G, Di Baldassarre G. Disaster risk reduction and the limits of truisms: Improving the knowledge and practice interface. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction. 2022 Jan 1;67:102661.
  8. Munawar HS, Mojtahedi M, Hammad AW, Kouzani A, Mahmud MP. Disruptive technologies as a solution for disaster risk management: A review. Science of the total environment. 2022 Feb 1;806:151351.
  9. Saulnier D, Dixit A, Nunes A, Murray V. Disaster risk factors–hazards, exposure and vulnerability. WHO guidance on research methods for health emergency and disaster risk management. 2021:151-63.
  10. Huq ME, Sarker MN, Prasad R, Kormoker T, Hossain MA, Rahman MM, Al Dughairi AA. Resilience for disaster management: opportunities and challenges. Climate vulnerability and resilience in the global south: human adaptations for sustainable futures. 2021:425-42.
  11. Wamsler C, Johannessen Å. Meeting at the crossroads? Developing national strategies for disaster risk reduction and resilience: Relevance, scope for, and challenges to, integration. International journal of disaster risk reduction. 2020 May 1;45:101452.
  12. Zuccaro G, Leone MF, Martucci C. Future research and innovation priorities in the field of natural hazards, disaster risk reduction, disaster risk management and climate change adaptation: A shared vision from the ESPREssO project. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction. 2020 Dec 1;51:101783.
Regular Issue Subscription Original Research
Volume 01
Issue 01
Received April 22, 2024
Accepted May 10, 2024
Published May 13, 2024
Views: 43