[{“box”:0,”content”:”[if 992 equals=”Open Access”]n
n
Open Access
nn
n
n[/if 992]n
n
n
n
n
n
Shaik Ayesha, Ravi Kumar Chittoria, Padmalakshmi Bharati Mohan, Jacob Antony Chakiath,
n
- n t
n
n
n[/foreach]
n
n[if 2099 not_equal=”Yes”]n
- [foreach 286] [if 1175 not_equal=””]n t
n[/if 1175][/foreach]
n[/if 2099][if 2099 equals=”Yes”][/if 2099]n
Abstract
nWound management stands as a cornerstone within surgical specialties, representing a fusion of art
and science aimed at orchestrating the intricate dance of tissue repair. Since the dawn of modern
medicine, the saga of wound healing has been meticulously chronicled, each chapter revealing the
evolving narrative of treatment modalities. Central to this narrative is the pivotal role of wound
assessment, a compass guiding clinicians through the labyrinth of therapeutic options. At the heart of
our practice lies the Bates-Jensen Wound Assessment Tool, a beacon illuminating the path to
comprehensive wound evaluation. Developed by Bates and Jensen in 1990, this tool has since
emerged as a stalwart companion in the realm of wound assessment, offering a structured framework
to navigate the complexities of tissue integrity. Through our experiential lens, the Bates-Jensen
Wound Assessment Tool emerges as a sentinel of precision, guiding clinicians through a systematic
evaluation encompassing wound dimensions, tissue types, exudate characteristics, and peri-wound
skin integrity. Its structured approach fosters consistency and objectivity, transcending the subjective
whims of individual interpretation. Moreover, the tool’s adaptability renders it a versatile instrument
across a spectrum of clinical settings, from acute care to long-term facilities. Its simplicity belies its
depth, affording clinicians of all cadres a common language to articulate wound characteristics and
track progression over time. In our clinical milieu, the Bates-Jensen Wound Assessment Tool has
emerged not merely as a tool, but as a conduit for dialogue and collaboration. Its standardized
parameters facilitate interdisciplinary communication, fostering a shared understanding among
caregivers and enhancing continuity of care. As we traverse the landscape of wound management, the
Bates-Jensen Wound Assessment Tool remains a steadfast companion, a testament to the enduring
legacy of innovation in healthcare. Through its lens, we glimpse not only the present state of the
wound but also the promise of healing yet to
unfold.
n
Keywords: Bates Jenson Wound Assessment Tool, Wound, assessment, Management.
n[if 424 equals=”Regular Issue”][This article belongs to International Journal of Biomedical Innovations and Engineering(ijbie)]
n
n
n
n
n
nn[if 992 equals=”Open Access”] Full Text PDF Download[/if 992] n
nn[if 379 not_equal=””]n
Browse Figures
n
n[/if 379]n
References
n[if 1104 equals=””]n
Beitz JM, Van Rijswijk L, using wound care algorithm, a content validity study.J. Wound Ostomy Ostomy continence Nurs. 1999;26(5):238-49.
2. Doughty DB. Wound assessment tips and techniques. Adv skin Wound care. 2004;17:369-72.
3. Harris C, Bates-Jensen B, Parslow N, Raizman R, Singh M, Ketchen R. Bates-Jensen wound assessment tool: pictorial guide validation project. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs [Internet]. 2010 [cited 2018 Dec 31];37(3):253-9.
4. Kobza L, Scheurich A. The impact of telemedicine on outcomes of chronic wounds in the home care setting. Ostomy wound management. 2000; 46:48-53.
5. Sibbald R G, Williamson D, Orsted H L, et al. Preparing the wound bed-debridement, bacterial balance, and moisture balance. Ostomy Wound management. 2000;46:14-35.
6. Bolton L, McNees P, van Rijswijk L, de Leon J, Lyder C, Kobza L, et al. Wound-Healing Outcomes Using Standardized Assessment and Care in Clinical Practice. J Wound Ostomy Cont Nurs [Inernet]. 2004 [cited 2018 Dec 31];31(2):65-71.
7. Bates Janeson BM, Vredeaue DL, Bretch ML. Validity and reliability of the pressure sore status tool. Decubitus. 1992;55(6):20-8.
8. Gould L, Stuntz M, Giovannelli M, Ahmad A, Aslam R, Mullen-Fortino M Whitney J, Calhoun J, Kirsner RS, Gordino GM. Wound healing society 2015 update on guidelines for pressure ulcers. Wound Rep Reg 2016; 24: 145–162. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
9. Matsui Y, Furue M, Sanada H, Tachibana T, Nakayama T, Sugama J, Furuta K, Tachi M, Tokunaga K, Miyachi Y. Development of the DESIGN-R with an observational study: an absolute evaluation tool for monitoring pressure ulcer wound healing. Wound Rep Regen. 2011. May-Jun;19(3):309–15. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
10. Thompson N, Gordey L, Bowles H, Parslow N, Houghton P. Reliability and validity of the revised photographic wound assessment tool on digital images taken of various types of chronic wounds. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2013. August;26(8):360–73. doi: [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
nn[/if 1104][if 1104 not_equal=””]n
- [foreach 1102]n t
- [if 1106 equals=””], [/if 1106][if 1106 not_equal=””],[/if 1106]
n[/foreach]
n[/if 1104]
nn
nn[if 1114 equals=”Yes”]n
n[/if 1114]
n
n
n
International Journal of Biomedical Innovations and Engineering
n
n
n
n
n
n
| Volume | 02 | |
| [if 424 equals=”Regular Issue”]Issue[/if 424][if 424 equals=”Special Issue”]Special Issue[/if 424] [if 424 equals=”Conference”][/if 424] | 02 | |
| Received | April 19, 2024 | |
| Accepted | April 20, 2024 | |
| Published | May 5, 2024 |
n
n
n
n
n
n nfunction myFunction2() {nvar x = document.getElementById(“browsefigure”);nif (x.style.display === “block”) {nx.style.display = “none”;n}nelse { x.style.display = “Block”; }n}ndocument.querySelector(“.prevBtn”).addEventListener(“click”, () => {nchangeSlides(-1);n});ndocument.querySelector(“.nextBtn”).addEventListener(“click”, () => {nchangeSlides(1);n});nvar slideIndex = 1;nshowSlides(slideIndex);nfunction changeSlides(n) {nshowSlides((slideIndex += n));n}nfunction currentSlide(n) {nshowSlides((slideIndex = n));n}nfunction showSlides(n) {nvar i;nvar slides = document.getElementsByClassName(“Slide”);nvar dots = document.getElementsByClassName(“Navdot”);nif (n > slides.length) { slideIndex = 1; }nif (n (item.style.display = “none”));nArray.from(dots).forEach(nitem => (item.className = item.className.replace(” selected”, “”))n);nslides[slideIndex – 1].style.display = “block”;ndots[slideIndex – 1].className += ” selected”;n}n”}]