Ravi Kumar Chittoria
Swaroop Johnson Michael
Amrutha J.S.
Abstract
Pressure ulcers, stemming mainly from friction and shear forces, manifest as chronic wounds
that worsen over time. They commonly afflict individuals who are bedridden or have limited
mobility. Our investigation involved a 62-year-old male with a hypertrophic scar on his back
resulting from the excision of a carbuncle. Subsequently, he developed a lumbar pressure sore at
the scar site. To address this issue, adjustments were made to his pressure garment, transforming
it into a practical solution for alleviating pressure, complemented by the addition of a belt. This
modification proved to be both cost-effective and conducive to the patient’s adherence to
treatment.
Enhancing the pressure garment to serve as a pressure-relieving apparatus with the incorporation
of a belt not only mitigated the risk of further pressure ulcers but also offered a solution tailored
to the patient’s needs. This approach, which repurposed existing resources, underscores the
importance of innovative strategies in healthcare management. By repurposing the garment,
healthcare costs are minimized while maximizing the patient’s comfort and compliance. This
adaptation not only addresses the immediate concern of pressure ulcer management but also
exemplifies a proactive approach to patient care, emphasizing practicality and patient-centered
solutions. Moreover, such interventions highlight the significance of individualized care plans
tailored to each patient’s unique circumstances, fostering optimal outcomes and overall well-
being
Keywords: Pressure ulcer, lumbar, form, pressure garment
References
1. Odden MC, Coxson PG, Moran A, Lightwood JM, Goldman L, Bibbins-Domingo K. The
impact of the aging population on coronary heart disease in the United States. Am J Med
2011;124:827–833.e5.
2. Murphy RA, Patel KV, Kritchevsky SB, et al.Weight change, body composition, and risk of
mobility disability and mortality in older adults: a population-based cohort study. J Am Geriatr
Soc 2014;62:1476–1483.
3. Sen CK, Gordillo GM, Roy S, et al. Human skin wounds: a major and snowballing threat to
public health and the economy. Wound Repair Regen 2009;17:763–771.
4. Coleman S, Nixon J, Keen J, et al. A new pressure ulcer conceptual framework. J Adv Nurs
2014;70:2222–2234.
5. Gould L, Abadir P, Brem H, et al. Chronic wound repair and healing in older adults: current
status and future research. Wound Repair Regen 2015;23:1–13.
6. Groeneveld A, Anderson M, Allen S, et al. The prevalence of pressure ulcers in a tertiary care
pediatric and adult hospital. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 2004;31:108–120; quiz 121–2.
7. Bluestein D, Javaheri A. Pressure ulcers: prevention, evaluation, and management. Am Fam
Physician 2008;78:1186–1194.
8. Kosiak M. Etiology and pathology of ischemic ulcers. Arch Phys Med Rehabil
1959;40:62–69.
9. Kosiak M. Prevention and rehabilitation of pressure ulcers. Decubitus 1991;4:60–62, 64, 66
passim.
10. Walton-Geer PS. Prevention of pressure ulcers in the surgical patient. AORN J
2009;89:538–548; quiz 549–51.
| Volume | |
| Received | February 8, 2024 |
| Accepted | February 19, 2024 |
| Published | March 30, 2024 |
