> 
 > 
Subscription Review Article

Effect of Tilt Angle on the Performance of Solar Photovoltaic Power Plant – A Quantitative Approach

by 
   Sachin Vrajlal Rajani,    Alpesh Adeshara,
Volume :  14 | Issue :  01 | Received :  March 20, 2024 | Accepted :  May 24, 2024 | Published :  May 30, 2024
DOI :  10.37591/JoPEPS

[This article belongs to Journal of Power Electronics and Power Systems(jopeps)]

Keywords

Solar photovoltaic systems, tilt angle, azimuth angle, power yield per annum

Abstract

Solar photovoltaic systems have now become integral part of Indian as well as global power systems. Rooftop and ground mounted solar systems have become very popular across India these days. The ground mounted systems produce large scale power and hence, are used for industrial applications also. This paper presents a detailed analysis of a 100-kW solar photovoltaic system with the different tilt angles taken into consideration for orientation of solar panels. Three different tilt angles 23°, 38° and 8° are considered in the software PVSyst® and output yield over a year are compared for the location of Rajkot, Gujarat, India. The findings are presented in the numeric form as well as in the graphical form.

Full Text

References

  1. Sachin Vrajlal Rajani, Vivek J Pandya (2015), Simulation and comparison of perturb and observe and incremental conductance MPPT algorithms for solar energy system connected to grid Sadhana, 40(1), pp. 139–153.
  2. M. S. Carvalho P. F. Correia L. A. F. Ferreira (2008), Distributed reactive power generation control for voltage rise mitigation in distribution networks, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.23, pp. 766-772.
  3. V. P. Kumar and R. Bhimasingu, “Optimal sizing of microgrid for an urban community building in south India using HOMER,” 2014 IEEE International Conference on Power Electronics, Drives and Energy Systems (PEDES), Mumbai, India, 2014, pp. 1-6, doi: 10.1109/PEDES.2014.7042059.
  4. Kachhiya Kinal, Lokhande Makarand, Patel Mukesh (2011) MATLAB/Simulink Model of Solar PV Module and MPPT Algorithm, National Conference on Recent Trends in Engineering & Technology, B.V.M. Engineering College, V.V. Nagar, Gujarat, India
  5. Sachin Vrajlal Rajani, Vivek J Pandya (2016), Experimental verification of the rate of charge improvement using photovoltaic MPPT hardware for the battery and ultracapacitor storage devices, Solar Energy, 139, 142-148.
  6. Armstrong S and Hurley W G (2004), Self-regulating maximum power point tracking for solar energy systems Universities Power Engineering Conference, 39th International IEEE, 604–609.
  7. Sachin Vrajlal Rajani, Vivek J Pandya, Varsha A. Shah (2016), Experimental validation of the ultracapacitor parameters using the method of averaging for photovoltaic applications, Journal of Energy Storage, 5, 120-126.
  8. Bruendlinger Roland, Benoît Bletterie, Matthias Milde, Henk Oldenkamp( 2007), Maximum Power Point Tracking Performance Under Partially Shaded PV Array Conditions,  OTTI PV- Symposium, Staffelstein, Germany: pp. 141–144.
  9. Sachin Vrajlal Rajani, Vivek J Pandya (2016), Ultracapacitor-battery hybrid energy storage for pulsed, cyclic and intermittent loads, Power Systems (ICPS) IEEE 6th International Conference on.
  10. Canova L. Giaccone F. Spertino M. Tartaglia (2009), Electrical impact of photovoltaic plant in distributed network. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Applications, 45, pp. 341-347.
  11. Thomson D. G. Infield (2007), Network power-flow analysis for a high penetration of distributed generation, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.22, pp. 1157-1162.