Subscription Original Research

Engineering Design Process of Door Handle

by 
   Sachin S. Chavan,    Prashant D. Yadav,    Dadaso D. Mohite,    Pramod V. Londhe,    Lakshit Kumar,
Volume :  14 | Issue :  01 | Received :  February 24, 2024 | Accepted :  April 13, 2024 | Published :  June 7, 2024
DOI :  10.37591/JoPRM

[This article belongs to Journal of Production Research & Management(joprm)]

Keywords

Door Handle, market survey, Product architecture, modular, quality functional deployment, concept generation, aesthetic, ergonomics, design for manufacturing, design for environment, product life cycle.

Abstract

The most important piece of hardware that people use on a daily basis is doors. We use doors to give ourselves a sense of security. The most crucial component of the door is the handle, which is required to operate the door. Door handles are used to open and close doors with the least amount of effort. We encounter many different kinds of door handles in our daily lives, including pull, lever, and doorknob handles. We are not aware of any selection criteria for door handles because there are so many different designs available. Depending on how the user responds to the available door handle, various shapes can be designed. It’s not just a device used for opening and closing of doors but also for locking purpose. Door handles are divided based on different types of doors, finishes, and shapes.

Full Text

References

  1. Journal of Material Science and Mechanical Engineering (JMSME) Quality Function Deployment in Tube Forming Industry: A Case Study Akshay D. Kulkarni, Ashish S. Bhalerao, B.M. Dabade and J. G. Naphade
  2. Production Planning & Control, 2017, Quality Function Deployment and operational design decisions – a healthcare infrastructure development case study. Benjamin Dehe and David Bamfor
  3. Application of Product Modularity in Industry: a Case Study, Ahm Shamsuzzoha* , Mahmood Al-Kindi, and Nasr Al-Hinai Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat, Oman
  4. Assessing Impacts of Modular Product Architectures On the Firm: A Case Study
  5. Windheim, J. Hackl, N. Gebhardt and D. Krause
  6. Aldien, Y., Welcome, D., Rakheja, S., Dong, R., Boileau, P. E.: “Contact pressure distribution at
  7. hand–handle interface: role of hand forces and handle size”, International Journal of Industrial
  8. Ergonomics 35, 267–286, 2005.Agranovich-Ponomareva, E. S. (2009). Architectural design: a reference. Phoenix.Borev, I. B. (1988). Aesthetics. Politizdat
  9. Booth, J. W., Taborda, E. A., Ramani, K., & Reid, T. (2016). Interventions for teaching sketching skills and reducing inhibition for novice engineering designers. Design studies, 43, 1-23.
  10. Chan, J., Dow, S. P., & Schunn, C. D. (2018). Do the best design ideas (really) come from conceptually distant sources of inspiration?. In Engineering a Better Future (pp. 111-139). Springer, Cham
  11. Securing the Future. One Planet Economy. Sustainable Development Strategy. Chapter 3, Defra, March 2005: http://www.defra.gov.uk/environment/business/scp/
  12. Champeney, Anna. 2006. Adapted from Reclaimed:Contemporary British Craft and Design, The British Council: http://www.britishcouncil.org/arts-design-craft-reclaimed.htm
  13. Goggin, Phillip & Dewberry, Emma. Spaceship Ecodesign. 1997: http://www.co-design.co.uk/edew+pgo.htm
  14. Dewhurst and G. Boothroyd, “Early cost estimation in product design,” Journal of Manufacturing Systems, vol. 26, no. 7, pp. 505-520, 1994.
  15. Katja, J. Miikka, and P. Jari, “Activity-based costing and process modeling for cost-conscious product design: A case study in a manufacturing company,” International Journal Productions Economic., vol. 79, pp. 75-82, 2002.
  16. Anderson, C., & Zeithaml, C. (1984). Stage of the product life cycle, business strategy, and business performance. The Academy of Management Journal, 27(1), 5-24.
  17. Bilhah, U.I. (2012). Reasons for failure of new products in the consumer goods industry. Business Review Journal, 7(2).