Open AI Chat GPT in Educational System: Evaluating the Efficacy of AI driven Learning

Year : 2024 | Volume : | : | Page : –
By

Zainab Raees,

Rubaid Ashfaq,

  1. Student Department of Electronics and Telecommunication Engineering, Amity University, Noida Uttar Pradesh India
  2. Associate Professor Department of Electronics and Telecommunication Engineering, Amity University, Noida Uttar Pradesh India

Abstract

This research delves into the effects of implementing OpenAI ChatGPT into educational systems and how it affects the results of student learning. The cutting-edge natural language processing model known as OpenAI ChatGPT has the ability to provide adaptive and individualized learning experiences, which might completely transform conventional teaching approaches. The purpose of this research is to determine if ChatGPT is more effective than more conventional approaches in enhancing students’ interest, understanding, and memory of course content. Additionally, it delves at how ChatGPT helps with personalized learning, how people see AI-driven education, and what ethical concerns come with using it in the classroom. This study aims to enlighten educators, lawmakers, and technology developers on the pros, cons, and ethical considerations of using ChatGPT in the classroom via empirical research and analysis.

Keywords: OpenAI ChatGPT, artificial intelligence, educational system, learning outcomes, personalized learning.

How to cite this article: Zainab Raees, Rubaid Ashfaq. Open AI Chat GPT in Educational System: Evaluating the Efficacy of AI driven Learning. Journal of Instrumentation Technology & Innovations. 2024; ():-.
How to cite this URL: Zainab Raees, Rubaid Ashfaq. Open AI Chat GPT in Educational System: Evaluating the Efficacy of AI driven Learning. Journal of Instrumentation Technology & Innovations. 2024; ():-. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/joiti/article=2024/view=167952

References

  1. Sharma, S., & Yadav, R. (2022). Chat GPT–A technological remedy or challenge for education system. Global Journal of Enterprise Information System, 14(4), 46-51.
  2. Tajik, E. (2024). A comprehensive Examination of the potential application of Chat GPT in Higher Education Institutions.
  3. Firat, M. (2023). How chat GPT can transform autodidactic experiences and open education?.
  4. Yu, H. (2023). Reflection on whether Chat GPT should be banned by academia from the perspective of education and teaching. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1181712.
  5. Fuchs, K. (2023, May). Exploring the opportunities and challenges of NLP models in higher education: is Chat GPT a blessing or a curse?. In Frontiers in Education (Vol. 8, p. 1166682). Frontiers.

 

  1. Allam, H., Dempere, J., Akre, V., Parakash, D., Mazher, N., & Ahamed, J. (2023, May). Artificial intelligence in education: an argument of Chat-GPT use in education. In 2023 9th International Conference on Information Technology Trends (ITT) (pp. 151-156). IEEE.
  2. Castillo, A. G. R., Rivera, H. V. H., Teves, R. M. V., Lopez, H. R. P., Reyes, G. Y., Rodriguez, M. A. M., … & Arias-Gonzáles, J. L. (2023). Effect of Chat GPT on the digitized learning process of university students. Journal of Namibian Studies: History Politics Culture, 33, 1-15.
  3. Brown, P. F., & Yarowsky, D. (2000). Natural language processing. In M. Arbib (Ed.), The Handbook of Brain Theory and Neural Networks (2nd ed., pp. 727-730). MIT Press.
  4. Gafni, R., & Dermody, J. (2020). Leveraging natural language processing in education: Applications, opportunities, and challenges. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 19, 197-223.
  5. Howard, J., & Ruder, S. (2018). Universal language model fine-tuning for text classification. arXiv preprint arXiv:1801.06146.
  6. Johnson, A. E., Pollard, T. J., & Shen, L. (2018). MIMIC-III, a freely accessible critical care database. Scientific Data, 5(1), 1-9.
  7. Linn, M. C., & Eylon, B. S. (2011). Science learning and instruction: Taking advantage of technology to promote knowledge integration. Routledge.
  8. Maas, A. L., & Daly, R. E. (2020). Learning Word Vectors for Sentiment Analysis. arXiv preprint arXiv:1301.3781.
  9. Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63(2), 81-97.
  10. Pascanu, R., Gulcehre, C., Cho, K., & Bengio, Y. (2014). How to construct deep recurrent neural networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1312.6026.
  11. Pennington, J., Socher, R., & Manning, C. (2014). GloVe: Global vectors for word representation. Proceedings of the 2014 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing (EMNLP), 1532-1543.
  12. Peters, M. E., Neumann, M., Iyyer, M., Gardner, M., Clark, C., Lee, K., & Zettlemoyer, L. (2018). Deep contextualized word representations. arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.05365.
  13. Radford, A., & Wu, J. (2019). Language Models are Unsupervised Multitask Learners. arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.00597.
  14. Raffel, C., Shazeer, N., & Roberts, A. (2020). Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformer. arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.10683.
  15. Reimers, N., & Gurevych, I. (2019). Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1908.10084.
  16. Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., & Gomez, A. N. (2017). Attention is all you need. Advances in neural information processing systems, 30, 5998-6008.
  17. Wang, A., Singh, A., Michael, J., Hill, F., Levy, O., & Bowman, S. R. (2019). GLUE: A multi-task benchmark and analysis platform for natural language understanding. arXiv preprint arXiv:1804.07461.
  18. Wolf, T., Debut, L., Sanh, V., Chaumond, J., Delangue, C., & Moi, A. (2020). Transformers: State-of-the-art Natural Language Processing. arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.03771.
  19. Yang, Z., Dai, Z., Yang, Y., Carbonell, J., Salakhutdinov, R., & Le, Q. (2019). XLNet: Generalized autoregressive pretraining for language understanding. arXiv preprint arXiv:1906.08237.
  20. Zhang, Y., & Wallace, B. (2015). A sensitivity analysis of (and practitioners’ guide to) convolutional neural networks for sentence classification. arXiv preprint arXiv:1510.03820.
  21. Ivanov S, Soliman M. Game of algorithms: ChatGPT implications for the future of tourism education and research. Journal of Tourism Futures. 2023 Apr 4;9(2):214-21.
  22. Jeon J, Lee S, Choe H. Beyond ChatGPT: A conceptual framework and systematic review of speech-recognition chatbots for language learning. Computers & Education. 2023 Aug 18:104898.
  23. Keiper A. Science and congress. The New Atlantis. 2004 Oct 1(7):19-50.
  24. van den Berg G, du Plessis E. ChatGPT and generative AI: Possibilities for its contribution to lesson planning, critical thinking and openness in teacher education. Education Sciences. 2023 Sep 29;13(10):998.
  25. Adams NJ, Conselice CJ, Ferreira L, Austin D, Trussler JA, Juodžbalis I, Wilkins SM, Caruana J, Dayal P, Verma A, Vijayan AP. Discovery and properties of ultra-high redshift galaxies (9< z< 12) in the JWST ERO SMACS 0723 Field. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 2023 Jan;518(3):4755-66.
  26. Adame AG, Aguilar J, Ahlen S, Alam S, Aldering G, Alexander DM, Alfarsy R, Prieto CA, Alvarez M, Alves O, Anand A. The early data release of the dark energy spectroscopic instrument. The Astronomical Journal. 2024 Jul 5;168(2):58.
  27. Chaudhry IS, Sarwary SA, El Refae GA, Chabchoub H. Time to revisit existing student’s performance evaluation approach in higher education sector in a new era of ChatGPT—a case study. Cogent Education. 2023 Dec 31;10(1):2210461.
  28. Jauhiainen JS, Guerra AG. Generative AI and ChatGPT in school children’s education: Evidence from a school lesson. Sustainability. 2023 Sep 21;15(18):14025.

 

Ahead of Print Subscription Review Article
Volume
Received June 9, 2024
Accepted June 28, 2024
Published August 14, 2024
Views: 38

Check Our other Platform for Workshops in the field of AI, Biotechnology & Nanotechnology.
Learn more
Check Out Platform for Webinars in the field of AI, Biotech. & Nanotech.
Learn more