Bioconjugates and Biohybrid Polymers: Intricate Cellular Integration Methods and Sophisticated Biofunctionalization Techniques for Tailored Properties in Medical Contexts

Open Access

Year : 2024 | Volume : | : | Page : –
By

Jadhav R.S,

Waghmode R. R,

Gavhane Y. N,

Dr. Snehal Masurkar,

  1. Assistant Professor Department of Pharmaceutical chemistry, Krishna Institute of Pharmacy, Krishna Vishwa Vidyapeeth Maharashtra India
  2. Assistant Professor Department of Pharmaceutics, Krishna Institute of Pharmacy, Krishna Vishwa Vidyapeeth Maharashtra India
  3. Assistant Professor Department of Pharmaceutics, Government College of pharmacy, Karad Maharashtra India
  4. Assistant Professor Faculty of Allied Sciences, Krishna Vishwa Vidyapeeth Maharashtra India

Abstract

Bioconjugates are made when biological molecules are covalently linked to manufactured polymers. They can be used in many ways for imaging, diagnosis, and specific drug delivery. Getting perfect cellular fusion is very important for how well they work. Biomolecules can be attached to polymer scaffolds in a controlled way using techniques like click chemistry and site-specific conjugation. This makes sure that the molecules connect optimally with their biological targets. Using methods with stimuli-responsive linkers also lets bioconjugates be released at specific times and places inside cells, which improves treatment accuracy and reduces side effects that aren’t supposed to happen. At the same time, biohybrid polymers, which are made by mixing biological substances with manufactured polymer frameworks, show a lot of promise for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. For mimicking native tissue microenvironments, it is important to make sure that organic and manufactured parts work together without any problems. Modern methods of making things, like electrospinning and self-assembly, make it possible to make biomimetic supports with adjustable material qualities and hierarchical structures that help cells stick to them, grow, and differentiate. Biofunctionalization methods that use peptide patterns, growth factors, and extracellular matrix proteins improve biohybrid polymer surfaces with bioactive cues, which helps cells connect with scaffolds in a particular way and tissues grow back. Bioconjugates and biohybrid polymers are very useful for many medical problems because they have specific qualities that can be adjusted. By making small changes to their chemical makes-up, building plans, and biofunctionalization methods, these materials can be made to fit the specific needs of different medical uses. Combining biological and synthetic parts opens up a world of new ways to improve patient results and advance precision medicine. These new ways include biomimetic structures that help tissues grow back and focused drug delivery systems that avoid being detected by the immune system. As study in this area grows, bioconjugates and biohybrid polymers will likely change the way medical technology is used, bringing about a new age of personalized healthcare.

Keywords: Bioconjugates, Biohybrid polymers, Cellular integration, Biofunctionalization, precision medicine

How to cite this article: Jadhav R.S, Waghmode R. R, Gavhane Y. N, Dr. Snehal Masurkar. Bioconjugates and Biohybrid Polymers: Intricate Cellular Integration Methods and Sophisticated Biofunctionalization Techniques for Tailored Properties in Medical Contexts. Journal of Polymer and Composites. 2024; ():-.
How to cite this URL: Jadhav R.S, Waghmode R. R, Gavhane Y. N, Dr. Snehal Masurkar. Bioconjugates and Biohybrid Polymers: Intricate Cellular Integration Methods and Sophisticated Biofunctionalization Techniques for Tailored Properties in Medical Contexts. Journal of Polymer and Composites. 2024; ():-. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/jopc/article=2024/view=160402

Full Text PDF Download


References

  1. Low SS, Ji D, Chai WS, Liu J, Khoo KS, Salmanpour S, et al. Recent progress in nanomaterials modified electrochemical biosensors for the detection of MicroRNA. Micromachines. 2021;12:1409.
  2. Jones RG, Kahovec J, Stepto R, Wilks ES, Hess M, Kitayama T, et al. Definitions of terms relating to the structure and processing of sols, gels, networks, and inorganic-organic hybrid materials (IUPAC Recommendations 2007). Pure Appl Chem. 2007;79:1801–29.
  3. Suni II. Substrate materials for biomolecular immobilization within electrochemical biosensors. Biosensors. 2021;11:239.
  4. Singh A, Sharma A, Ahmed A, Sundramoorthy AK, Furukawa H, Arya S, et al. Recent advances in electrochemical biosensors: Applications, challenges, and future scope. Biosensors. 2021;11:336.
  5. Yüce M, Kurt H. How to make nanobiosensors: Surface modification and characterisation of nanomaterials for biosensing applications. RSC Adv. 2017;7:49386–403.
  6. Rocchitta G, Spanu A, Babudieri S, Latte G, Madeddu G, Galleri G, et al. Enzyme biosensors for biomedical applications: Strategies for safeguarding analytical performances in biological fluids. Sensors. 2016;16:780.
  7. Taylor-Pashow KML, Della Rocca J, Huxford RC, Lin W. Hybrid nanomaterials for biomedical applications. Chem Commun. 2010;46:5832–49.
  8. Hu Y, Huang Y, Tan C, Zhang X, Lu Q, Sindoro M, et al. Two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenide nanomaterials for biosensing applications. Mater Chem Front. 2016;1:24–36.
  9. Du XJ, Wang JL, Iqbal S, Li HJ, Cao ZT, Wang YC, et al. The effect of surface charge on oral absorption of polymeric nanoparticles. Biomater Sci. 2018;6:642–50.
  10. Ajani SN, Khobragade P, Dhone M, Ganguly B, Shelke N, Parati N. Advancements in computing: Emerging trends in computational science with next-generation computing. Int J Intell Syst Appl Eng. 2023;12(7s):546–59.
  11. El Badawy AM, Silva RG, Morris B, Scheckel KG, Suidan MT, Tolaymat TM. Surface charge-dependent toxicity of silver nanoparticles. Environ Sci Technol. 2011;45:283–7.
  12. Deprey K, Becker L, Kritzer J, Plückthun A. Trapped! A critical evaluation of methods for measuring total cellular uptake versus cytosolic localization. Bioconjug Chem. 2019;30:1006–27.
  13. Sharma AR, Kundu SK, Nam JS, Sharma G, Priya Doss CG, Lee SS, et al. Next generation delivery system for proteins and genes of therapeutic purpose: Why and how? Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:e327950.
  14. Kleineberg C, Wölfer C, Abbasnia A, Pischel D, Bednarz C, Ivanov I, et al. Light-driven ATP regeneration in diblock/grafted hybrid vesicles. ChemBioChem. 2020;21:2149–60.
  15. Khan S, Li M, Muench SP, Jeuken LJC, Beales PA. Durable proteo-hybrid vesicles for the extended functional lifetime of membrane proteins in bionanotechnology. Chem Commun. 2016;52:11020–3.
  16. Han Z, Wang P, Lu Y, Jia Z, Qu S, Yang W. A versatile hydrogel network-repairing strategy achieved by the covalent-like hydrogen bond interaction. Sci Adv. 2022;8:eabl5066.
  17. Vasile C, Pamfil D, Stoleru E, Baican M. New developments in medical applications of hybrid hydrogels containing natural polymers. Molecules. 2020;25:1539.
  18. Soni KS, Desale SS, Bronich TK. Nanogels: An overview of properties, biomedical applications and obstacles to clinical translation. J Control Release. 2016;240:109–26.
  19. El-Husseiny HM, Mady EA, Hamabe L, Abugomaa A, Shimada K, Yoshida T, et al. Smart/stimuli-responsive hydrogels: Cutting-edge platforms for tissue engineering and other biomedical applications. Mater Today Bio. 2022;13:100186.
  20. Jia X, Kiick KL. Hybrid multicomponent hydrogels for tissue engineering. Macromol Biosci. 2009;9:140–56.
  21. Bashir S, Hina M, Iqbal J, Rajpar AH, Mujtaba MA, Alghamdi NA, et al. Fundamental concepts of hydrogels: Synthesis, properties, and their applications. Polymers. 2020;12:2702.
  22. Ho TC, Chang CC, Chan HP, Chung TW, Shu CW, Chuang KP, et al. Hydrogels: Properties and applications in biomedicine. Molecules. 2022;27:2902.
  23. Palaniappan, M., Palanisamy, S., Murugesan, T., Tadepalli, S., Khan, R., Ataya, S., and Santulli, C. (2024). “Influence of washing with sodium lauryl sulphate (SLS) surfactant on different properties of ramie fibres,” BioResources 19(2), 2609-2625.
  24. Mylsamy B, Shanmugam SKM, Aruchamy K, Palanisamy S, Nagarajan R, Ayrilmis N. A review on natural fiber composites: Polymer matrices, fiber surface treatments, fabrication methods, properties, and applications. Polym Eng Sci. 2024; 64(6): 2345-2373. doi:10.1002/pen.26713
  25. Palanisamy, S., Rajan, V.K., Mani, A.K., Palaniappan, M., Santulli, C., Alavudeen, A. et al. (2024) Extraction and characterization of fiber from the flower stalk of Sansevieria cylindrica. Physiologia Plantarum, 176(2), e14279. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/ppl.14279
  26. Palaniappan, M., Palanisamy, S., Murugesan, T.M. et al. Novel Ficus retusa L. aerial root fiber: a sustainable alternative for synthetic fibres in polymer composites reinforcement. Biomass Conv. Bioref. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-024-05495-4
  27. Palaniappan, M., Palanisamy, S., Khan, R. et al. Synthesis and suitability characterization of microcrystalline cellulose from Citrus x sinensis sweet orange peel fruit waste-based biomass for polymer composite applications. J Polym Res 31, 105 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10965-024-03946-0
  28. Karthik, M. Bhuvaneshwaran, M. S. Senthil Kumar, S. Palanisamy, M. Palaniappan, N. Ayrilmis, ChemistrySelect 2024, 9, e202400650. https://doi.org/10.1002/slct.202400650

 

Ahead of Print Open Access Review Article
Volume
Received May 15, 2024
Accepted June 26, 2024
Published July 11, 2024
Views: 78

Check Our other Platform for Workshops in the field of AI, Biotechnology & Nanotechnology.
Learn more
Check Out Platform for Webinars in the field of AI, Biotech. & Nanotech.
Learn more