Determining the Effect of Applying Different type and Rate of NPSB Fertilizers on Yield of Common Bean at Wolaita Zone Boloso Sore Woreda, South Ethiopia

Year : 2024 | Volume : | : | Page : –
By

Yehuala alemneh

Zerihun Achiso

  1. Researcher Southern agricultural research institution, Areka Agricultura research center Areka Ethiopia
  2. Researcher Southern agricultural research institution, Areka Agricultura research center Areka Ethiopia

Abstract

The research was conducted to determine effect of different types and rate of NPSB and CU fertilizers on yield of common bean at boloso sore woreda at rain-feid condition for two years (2016 & 2017) at Areka research center, located at an altitude of 1830 masl, latitude 07° 4’ 24’’ N, longitude 37° 41’ 30’’ E, temperature: 20.3° C, rainfall: 1200-1700 mm, soil type: Haplic alisol. A completely randomized block design (RCBD) was with six treatments replicated three times across farmers. The experiment had six treatments these were: T1: control (No fertilizer), T2 (NPSB: 69N, 54 P2O5,10S, 0.1B ); T3(NPSBCu:23N, 36 P2O5, 6.7S,0.71B + 0.4Cu ),T4(NPSBCU: 46N, 54 P2O5, 10S, 1.07B + 0.4 kg Cu),T5(NPSBCu: 69N, 72 P2O5,13S, 1.4B+0.4Cu) and T6 (NPSBCu: 92N, 90 P2O5, 17S, 1.7B + 0.4Cu). The plot size was 4m with 4m and spacing between row and plants were 40 and10 cm respectively. Common bean is the most responsive legume to fertilization if soil fertility is poor. At Boloso sore (Areka), it responded well to application of NPSB and NPSBCu when compared to untreated control. Excluding Cu from NPSBCu did not affect the yield of common bean. Therefore, from our current results it could be concluded and recommended that farmers at the study area can use NPSB @ the rate of 69, 54, 13, 1.4 kg ha-1 for production of common bean. Further research is needed to verify and demonstrate the effects and for wider use.

Keywords: NPSB Fertilizers, Ethiopia, Soil Sampling ,Yield , Agronomic

How to cite this article: Yehuala alemneh, Zerihun Achiso. Determining the Effect of Applying Different type and Rate of NPSB Fertilizers on Yield of Common Bean at Wolaita Zone Boloso Sore Woreda, South Ethiopia. Research & Reviews : Journal of Botany. 2024; ():-.
How to cite this URL: Yehuala alemneh, Zerihun Achiso. Determining the Effect of Applying Different type and Rate of NPSB Fertilizers on Yield of Common Bean at Wolaita Zone Boloso Sore Woreda, South Ethiopia. Research & Reviews : Journal of Botany. 2024; ():-. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/rrjob/article=2024/view=0


References

  1. Mulugeta Habte and Abay Ayalew. 2017. Blended Fertilizers as Sources of Balanced Nutrients for Growth and Yield of Wheat at Hulla District in Southern Ethiopia. Journal of Natural Sciences Research, .7 (9):69-73.
  2. Alexander, M. (1977). Introduction to Soil Microbiology.2nd edition. Wiley and Sons, New York.
  3.  Graham, P.H. and Rosas, J.C (1979). Phosphorus fertilization and symbiotic nitrogen fixation in common bean. Agric. J.71, 925–926.
  4. Franco, A.A. (1977). Nutritional restraints for tropical grain legume symbiosis. In: Exploiting the Legume—Rhizobium symbiosis in Tropical                Agriculture (J.M. Vincent, A.S. Whitney and J. Bose, eds), University of Hawaii NifTAL Project, U.S.A.
  5. Graham, P.H. (1981). Some problems of nodulation and symbiotic nitrogen fixation in Phaseolus vulgaris L Field Crops Research, 4, 93,-112.
  6. Graham,.H. and Halliday, J. (1977). Inoculation and nitrogen fixation in the genus Phaseolus. In: Exploiting the Legume-Rhizobium Symbiosis in Tropical Agriculture. (J.M. Vincent, A.S. Whitney and J. Bose, eds): University of Hawaii NifTAL Project, U.S.A.
  7. Gobara, L.A.M,. A.A. Mahdi,. A.M. El-Tilib and M.H.M. Abdel. (1993). Response of Haricot bean to inoculation, nitrogen and phosphorus fertilization in Sudan. East African Agricultural and Forestry Journal.59:41-51
  8. Sahlemedhin Sertsue and Taye Bekele, 2000. Procedures for soil and plant analysis. National Soil Research Center, Ethiopian Agricultural Research Organization, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. 110 p.
  9. Gomez, K.A. and A.A. Gomez, (1984). Statistical procedures for agricultural research (2 ed.). John wiley and sons, NewYork, 680p
  10. Flores, N. M., Miller, T. R., and Stockwell, J. D. (2018). Concentrations of cyanotoxins in fresh water and fish.Environmental Data Initiative doi: 10.6073/pasta/0c250018ee7732d984be74e2043b84b4.
  11. Berhanu Debele, 1980. The physical criteria and their rating proposed for land evaluation in the highland region of Ethiopia. Land Use Planning and Regulatory Department, Ministry of Agriculture, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
  12. ETHIOSIS (Ethiopian Soil Fertility status, 2016). Fertilizer Recommendation Atlas of Southern Ethiopia nation nationality and people regional state, Ethiopia Pp 81, https//ww.ata.gov.et/download/soil fertility statusfertilizer.reccomendation-atlas-tigray-regional-state-jul2014
  13. Tekalign Tadese. 1991. Soil, plant, water, fertilizer, animal manure and compost analysis. Working Document No. 13. International Livestock Research Center for Africa, Addis Ababa.
  14. A and LA Black, 1934. An examination of the degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter, and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Science 37(1): 29-38.doi:10.1097/00010694-193401000- 00003
  15. Booker, T. L., (1991). Tropical soil manual A hand book for soil survey and Agricultural land.
  16. Marx, E.S., Hart, J. and Stevens, R.G. 1999. Soil Test Interpretation Guide. Oregon State University. Soil Sci. 120: 1120-1322.
  17. Horneck, D.A., Sullivan, D.M., Owen, J.S. and Hart, J.M. 2011. Soil test interpretation guide. Oregon State University Extension Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture. pp. 3-5.

Ahead of Print Subscription Original Research
Volume
Received June 15, 2024
Accepted June 27, 2024
Published July 6, 2024

function myFunction2() {
var x = document.getElementById(“browsefigure”);
if (x.style.display === “block”) {
x.style.display = “none”;
}
else { x.style.display = “Block”; }
}
document.querySelector(“.prevBtn”).addEventListener(“click”, () => {
changeSlides(-1);
});
document.querySelector(“.nextBtn”).addEventListener(“click”, () => {
changeSlides(1);
});
var slideIndex = 1;
showSlides(slideIndex);
function changeSlides(n) {
showSlides((slideIndex += n));
}
function currentSlide(n) {
showSlides((slideIndex = n));
}
function showSlides(n) {
var i;
var slides = document.getElementsByClassName(“Slide”);
var dots = document.getElementsByClassName(“Navdot”);
if (n > slides.length) { slideIndex = 1; }
if (n (item.style.display = “none”));
Array.from(dots).forEach(
item => (item.className = item.className.replace(” selected”, “”))
);
slides[slideIndex – 1].style.display = “block”;
dots[slideIndex – 1].className += ” selected”;
}