[{“box”:0,”content”:”[if 992 equals=”Open Access”]n
n
Open Access
nn
n
n[/if 992]n
n
n
n
n
n
Payel Chakraborty, Shubhankar Jha,
n
- n t
n
n
n[/foreach]
n
n[if 2099 not_equal=”Yes”]n
- [foreach 286] [if 1175 not_equal=””]n t
- Student,, Assistant Professor, Department of Computer Applications, Maulana Abul Kalam Azad University of Technology, Kolkata,, , Department of Computer Applications, Maulana Abul Kalam Azad University of Technology, Kolkata, West Bengal,, West Bengal, India, India
n[/if 1175][/foreach]
n[/if 2099][if 2099 equals=”Yes”][/if 2099]n
Abstract
nSince cancer is still one of the world’s top causes of death, precise and effective detection techniques must be developed. Machine learning (ML) approaches have shown promise in recent years for enhancing cancer prognosis and detection. This paper presents a comprehensive review of the application of ML in cancer detection, focusing on various modalities including medical imaging, genomic data, and clinical records. We highlight the challenges associated with traditional cancer detection methods and discuss how ML algorithms can address these limitations by analyzing complex patterns and extracting meaningful features from diverse datasets. Additionally, we look at the most recent developments in machine learning (ML)-based cancer detection systems, such as deep learning models, the use of support vector machines (SVMs), and convolutional neural networks (CNNs). We also discuss the importance of large-scale datasets and feature selection techniques in training accurate ML models for cancer detection. Additionally, we review the integration of multimodal data fusion techniques to improve the performance of ML-based cancer detection systems. Additionally, we go over the difficulties and ethical issues surrounding the application of machine learning (ML) techniques in healthcare contexts, including bias mitigation, interpretability, and reproducibility. Finally, we outline future research directions and potential opportunities for the development of more robust and reliable ML-based cancer detection systems. This review aims to provide insights into the current state-of-the-art, challenges, and prospects of utilizing ML for enhancing cancer detection, ultimately contributing to improved patient outcomes and personalized treatment strategies
n
Keywords: Heterogeneous, malignant, benign, convolutional
n[if 424 equals=”Regular Issue”][This article belongs to International Journal of Radio Frequency Innovations(ijrfi)]
n
n
n
n
n
nn[if 992 equals=”Open Access”] Full Text PDF Download[/if 992] n
nn[if 379 not_equal=””]n
Browse Figures
n
n[/if 379]n
References
n[if 1104 equals=””]n
- Barlow WE, Chi C, Carney PA, et al. Accuracy of screening mammography interpretation by characteristics of radiologists. JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 2004; 96:1840–1850.
- Esteva A, Chou K, Yeung S, Naik N, Madani A, Mottaghi A, Liu Y, Topol E, Dean J, Socher R. Deep learning-enabled medical computer vision. NPJ digital medicine. 2021 Jan 8;4(1):5.
- Kumar G, Kumar P, Kumar D. Brain tumor detection using convolutional neural network. In2021 IEEE International Conference on Mobile Networks and Wireless Communications (ICMNWC) 2021 Dec 3 (pp. 1–6). IEEE.
- Lambin P, Rios-Velazquez E, Leijenaar R, Carvalho S, Van Stiphout RG, Granton P, Zegers CM, Gillies R, Boellard R, Dekker A, Aerts HJ. Radiomics: extracting more information from medical images using advanced feature analysis. European journal of cancer. 2012 Mar 1;48(4):441-6.
- Xue R, Chen LU, Zhang C, Fujita M, Li R, Yan SM, Ong CK, Liao X, Gao Q, Sasagawa S, Li Y. Genomic and transcriptomic profiling of combined hepatocellular and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma reveals distinct molecular subtypes. Cancer cell. 2019 Jun 10;35(6):932–47.
- Shen R, Li P, Li B, Zhang B, Feng L, Cheng S. Identification of distinct immune subtypes in colorectal cancer based on the stromal compartment. Frontiers in oncology. 2020 Jan 10;9:1497.
- Hu H, Mu Q, Bao Z, Chen Y, Liu Y, Chen J, Wang K, Wang Z, Nam Y, Jiang B, Sa JK. Mutational landscape of secondary glioblastoma guides MET-targeted trial in brain tumor. Cell. 2018 Nov 29;175(6):1665–78.
- Yan R, Zhang F, Rao X, Lv Z, Li J, Zhang L, Liang S, Li Y, Ren F, Zheng C, Liang J. Richer fusion network for breast cancer classification based on multimodal data. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making. 2021 Apr;21:1–5.
- Lundberg SM, Lee SI. A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. Advances in neural information processing systems. 2017;30.
- Elmore JG, Miglioretti DL, Reisch LM, et al. Screening Mammograms by Community Radiologists: Variability in False-Positive Rates. JNCI Cancer Spectrum. 2002; 94:1373–1380.
- Dean JC, Ilvento CC. Improved Cancer Detection Using Computer-Aided Detection with Diagnostic and Screening Mammography: Prospective Study of 104 Cancers. American Journal of Roentgenology. 2006; 187:20–28.
- Fischer EA, Lo JY, Markey MK. Bayesian Networks of BI-RADS Descriptors for Breast Lesion Classification. IEEE EMBS.
- Taplin SH, Thompson RS, Schnitzer F, Anderman C, Immanuel V. Revisions in the risk-based Breast Cancer Screening Program at Group Health Cooperative. 1990; 66:812–818. Wor
- Chugh G, Kumar S, Singh N. Survey on machine learning and deep learning applications in breast cancer diagnosis. Cognitive Computation. 2021 Nov;13(6):1451–70.
- Meyer-Bäse A, Morra L, Meyer-Bäse U, Pinker K. Current status and future perspectives of artificial intelligence in magnetic resonance breast imaging. Contrast Media & Molecular Imaging. 2020;2020(1):6805710.
- Sahu A, Qazi S, Raza K, Singh A, Verma S. Machine learning-based approach for early diagnosis of breast cancer using biomarkers and gene expression profiles. InComputational intelligence in oncology: applications in diagnosis, prognosis and therapeutics of cancers 2022 Mar 2 (pp. 285–306). Singapore: Springer Singapore.
- Sattlecker M, Stone N, Bessant C. Current trends in machine-learning methods applied to spectroscopic cancer diagnosis. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry. 2014 Jul 1;59:17–25.
- Tufail AB, Ma YK, Kaabar MK, Martínez F, Junejo AR, Ullah I, Khan R. Deep learning in cancer diagnosis and prognosis prediction: a minireview on challenges, recent trends, and future directions. Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine. 2021;2021(1):9025470.
- Zhang Z, Sejdić E. Radiological images and machine learning: trends, perspectives, and prospects. Computers in biology and medicine. 2019 May 1; 108:354–370.st perimeter 94.52
nn[/if 1104][if 1104 not_equal=””]n
- [foreach 1102]n t
- [if 1106 equals=””], [/if 1106][if 1106 not_equal=””],[/if 1106]
n[/foreach]
n[/if 1104]
nn
nn[if 1114 equals=”Yes”]n
n[/if 1114]
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
| Volume | 02 | |
| [if 424 equals=”Regular Issue”]Issue[/if 424][if 424 equals=”Special Issue”]Special Issue[/if 424] [if 424 equals=”Conference”][/if 424] | 01 | |
| Received | May 30, 2024 | |
| Accepted | June 26, 2024 | |
| Published | July 29, 2024 |
n
n
n
n
n
n nfunction myFunction2() {nvar x = document.getElementById(“browsefigure”);nif (x.style.display === “block”) {nx.style.display = “none”;n}nelse { x.style.display = “Block”; }n}ndocument.querySelector(“.prevBtn”).addEventListener(“click”, () => {nchangeSlides(-1);n});ndocument.querySelector(“.nextBtn”).addEventListener(“click”, () => {nchangeSlides(1);n});nvar slideIndex = 1;nshowSlides(slideIndex);nfunction changeSlides(n) {nshowSlides((slideIndex += n));n}nfunction currentSlide(n) {nshowSlides((slideIndex = n));n}nfunction showSlides(n) {nvar i;nvar slides = document.getElementsByClassName(“Slide”);nvar dots = document.getElementsByClassName(“Navdot”);nif (n > slides.length) { slideIndex = 1; }nif (n (item.style.display = “none”));nArray.from(dots).forEach(nitem => (item.className = item.className.replace(” selected”, “”))n);nslides[slideIndex – 1].style.display = “block”;ndots[slideIndex – 1].className += ” selected”;n}n”}]