Utilizing Amniotic Membrane Allograft as Regenerative Therapy for Treating Burns

[{“box”:0,”content”:”[if 992 equals=”Open Access”]n

n

n

n

Open Access

nn

n

n[/if 992]n

n

Year : July 20, 2024 at 4:20 pm | [if 1553 equals=””] Volume :13 [else] Volume :13[/if 1553] | [if 424 equals=”Regular Issue”]Issue[/if 424][if 424 equals=”Special Issue”]Special Issue[/if 424] [if 424 equals=”Conference”][/if 424] : 02 | Page : 26-31

n

n

n

n

n

n

By

n

[foreach 286]n

n

n

Nishant Visvas Dumont, Ravi Kumar Chittoria, Kanav Gupta, Jacob Antony Chakiath, Padmalakshmi Bharathi Mohan,

n

    n t

  • n

n

n[/foreach]

n

n[if 2099 not_equal=”Yes”]n

    [foreach 286] [if 1175 not_equal=””]n t

  1. n[/if 1175][/foreach]

n[/if 2099][if 2099 equals=”Yes”][/if 2099]n

n

Abstract

nBurn injuries, affecting individuals across all age groups, can result from thermal, scald, or electrical sources. To enhance the healing process and minimize scar formation, various scaffolds are currently employed in burn treatment. One such scaffold is collagen, which facilitates tissue regeneration and promotes the formation of new blood vessels. Additionally, scaffolds like the amniotic membrane play a crucial role in proper epithelialization and scar reduction. The amniotic membrane is particularly noteworthy for its unique anti-inflammatory and bacteriostatic properties, which contribute to its effectiveness in wound healing. In our study, we focused on the use of amniotic membrane allografts as biological dressings for burn wounds. Specifically, we applied this treatment to an adult patient’s right thigh, which had sustained significant burn injuries. The choice of the amniotic membrane was based on its proven benefits in enhancing the healing process and reducing complications associated with burn injuries. The results from our study reinforce the potential of amniotic membrane allografts in treating burn wounds. By providing a conducive environment for tissue regeneration and minimizing the risk of infection, the amniotic membrane allograft proved to be an effective dressing for the patient’s burn wounds. Moreover, its anti-inflammatory properties helped reduce inflammation, further accelerating the healing process and improving the overall outcome for the patient. In conclusion, the use of amniotic membrane as a scaffold in burn treatment offers significant advantages. Its ability to promote tissue regeneration, reduce scar formation, and provide anti-inflammatory and bacteriostatic effects makes it a valuable tool in the management of burn injuries. This study underscores the importance of continued research and clinical application of amniotic membrane allografts to improve patient outcomes in burn care.

n

n

n

Keywords: Amniotic membrane allograft, wound healing, regenerative therapy

n[if 424 equals=”Regular Issue”][This article belongs to Research & Reviews : Journal of Surgery(rrjos)]

n

[/if 424][if 424 equals=”Special Issue”][This article belongs to Special Issue under section in Research & Reviews : Journal of Surgery(rrjos)][/if 424][if 424 equals=”Conference”]This article belongs to Conference [/if 424]

n

n

n

How to cite this article: Nishant Visvas Dumont, Ravi Kumar Chittoria, Kanav Gupta, Jacob Antony Chakiath, Padmalakshmi Bharathi Mohan. Utilizing Amniotic Membrane Allograft as Regenerative Therapy for Treating Burns. Research & Reviews : Journal of Surgery. June 30, 2024; 13(02):26-31.

n

How to cite this URL: Nishant Visvas Dumont, Ravi Kumar Chittoria, Kanav Gupta, Jacob Antony Chakiath, Padmalakshmi Bharathi Mohan. Utilizing Amniotic Membrane Allograft as Regenerative Therapy for Treating Burns. Research & Reviews : Journal of Surgery. June 30, 2024; 13(02):26-31. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/rrjos/article=June 30, 2024/view=0

nn[if 992 equals=”Open Access”] Full Text PDF Download[/if 992] n

n[if 992 not_equal=’Open Access’] [/if 992]nn

n

nn[if 379 not_equal=””]n

Browse Figures

n

n

[foreach 379]n

n[/foreach]n

n

n

n[/if 379]n

n

References

n[if 1104 equals=””]n

Haghpanah S, Bogie K, Wang X, Banks PG, Ho CH. Reliability of electronic versus manual measurement techniques. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006; 87: 1396-1402.

  1. Chitoria RK, Kumar P, Baljaj SP, Singh AK, Gupta DK. General clinical guidelines for wound management: Redefining acronym SWCR. Journal of SWCR. 2014; 7(1): 2-7.
  2. Shetty R, Sreekar H, Lamba S, Gupta AK. A novel and accurate technique of photographic wound measurement. Indian J Plast Surg. 2012; 45(2): 425-429.
  3. Majeske C. Reliability of wound surface area measurement. PhyTher. 1992; 72: 138-141.
  4. Mayrovitz HN, Soontupe LB. Wound area by computerized planimetry of digital images. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2009; 22: 222-229.
  5. Pandey S, Chitoria RK, Mohapatra DP, et al. Application of digital planimetry: A novel technique of wound measurement in diabetic foot ulcer. Dermatology International. 2016; 21: 343-331.
  6. Pires IM, Garcia NM. Wound area assessment using mobile application. Proceedings of the International Conference on Biomedical Electronics and Devices-Volume 1: SmartMedDev, International Conference on Biomedical Elechonics and Devices; January 12-15; Lisbon, Portugal. 2015. pp. 271-282.
  7. 2011. Mowa-Mobile Wound Analyzer For Iphone And Ipad-Healthpath [Online]. Available: Http://Www.Healthpath.It/Imowa.Html [Accessed January 12th 2014].
  8. Hettiarachchi, N. D. J., Mahindaratne, R. B. H., Mendis, G. D. C., Nanayakkara, H. T. & Nanayakkara, N. D. 2013. Mobile Based Wound Measurement. 2013 Ieee Point-Of-Care Healthcare Technologies (Pht), 298-301.
  9. Kim, H. M., Lowery, J. C., Hamill, J. B. & Wilkins, E. G. 2003. Accuracy Of A Web-Based System For Monitoring Chronic Wounds. Telemed J E Health, 9, 129-40.

nn[/if 1104][if 1104 not_equal=””]n

    [foreach 1102]n t

  1. [if 1106 equals=””], [/if 1106][if 1106 not_equal=””],[/if 1106]
  2. n[/foreach]

n[/if 1104]

nn


nn[if 1114 equals=”Yes”]n

n[/if 1114]

n

n

[if 424 not_equal=””]Regular Issue[else]Published[/if 424] Subscription Original Research

n

n

n

n

n

Research & Reviews : Journal of Surgery

n

[if 344 not_equal=””]ISSN: 2319-3425[/if 344]

n

n

n

n

n

[if 2146 equals=”Yes”][/if 2146][if 2146 not_equal=”Yes”][/if 2146]n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n[if 1748 not_equal=””]

[else]

[/if 1748]n

n

n

Volume 13
[if 424 equals=”Regular Issue”]Issue[/if 424][if 424 equals=”Special Issue”]Special Issue[/if 424] [if 424 equals=”Conference”][/if 424] 02
Received May 29, 2024
Accepted June 5, 2024
Published June 30, 2024

n

n

n

n

n

n nfunction myFunction2() {nvar x = document.getElementById(“browsefigure”);nif (x.style.display === “block”) {nx.style.display = “none”;n}nelse { x.style.display = “Block”; }n}ndocument.querySelector(“.prevBtn”).addEventListener(“click”, () => {nchangeSlides(-1);n});ndocument.querySelector(“.nextBtn”).addEventListener(“click”, () => {nchangeSlides(1);n});nvar slideIndex = 1;nshowSlides(slideIndex);nfunction changeSlides(n) {nshowSlides((slideIndex += n));n}nfunction currentSlide(n) {nshowSlides((slideIndex = n));n}nfunction showSlides(n) {nvar i;nvar slides = document.getElementsByClassName(“Slide”);nvar dots = document.getElementsByClassName(“Navdot”);nif (n > slides.length) { slideIndex = 1; }nif (n (item.style.display = “none”));nArray.from(dots).forEach(nitem => (item.className = item.className.replace(” selected”, “”))n);nslides[slideIndex – 1].style.display = “block”;ndots[slideIndex – 1].className += ” selected”;n}n”}]