Clinical study of ERAS programs for chronic anal diseases

Year : 2024 | Volume :13 | Issue : 02 | Page : –
By

Kim Ryong,

Ro Bom,

Choe Un Kyong,

Ri Ok Kyong,

Abstract

Background: ERAS protocols were implemented for the management of chronic anal diseases in our clinical setting.

Patients and Methods: The clinical outcomes of these ERAS programs were systematically analyzed.

Results: Our study revealed significant improvements with the implemented ERAS protocols. Specifically, the average time for healing with these protocols was 7.9±0.76 days, notably shorter compared to the previous standard protocols which averaged 14.3±0.4 days. Moreover, there was a marked reduction in postoperative complications, and a higher proportion of patients achieved complete cure.

Conclusion: The findings from our analysis demonstrate the applicability and efficacy of ERAS programs in surgical interventions and treatments for chronic anal diseases. These results highlight the superiority of ERAS protocols over traditional approaches, emphasizing faster healing times, fewer postoperative complications, and higher rates of complete cure. This underscores the potential of ERAS in optimizing patient outcomes and improving the overall quality of care in the surgical management of chronic anal diseases. Thus, integrating ERAS principles into clinical practice represents a significant advancement in enhancing treatment effectiveness and patient recovery in this specialized field.

Keywords: chronic, anal disease, chronic anal disease, ERAS

[This article belongs to Research & Reviews : Journal of Surgery(rrjos)]

How to cite this article: Kim Ryong, Ro Bom, Choe Un Kyong, Ri Ok Kyong. Clinical study of ERAS programs for chronic anal diseases. Research & Reviews : Journal of Surgery. 2024; 13(02):-.
How to cite this URL: Kim Ryong, Ro Bom, Choe Un Kyong, Ri Ok Kyong. Clinical study of ERAS programs for chronic anal diseases. Research & Reviews : Journal of Surgery. 2024; 13(02):-. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/rrjos/article=2024/view=157104

References

. Feldman L, Delaney CP, Ljungqvist O, Carli F. The SAGES/ERAS Society Manual of Enhanced Recovery Programs for Gastrointestinal Surgery. New York, NY: Springer; 2015. 2. Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry. Tjock-och ändtarmscancer http://www.kvalitetsregister .se/hittaregister/registerarkiv /tjockochandtarmscancer.2315.html. Accessed December 7, 2016.

  1. The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland. National Bowel Cancer Audit (NBOCA). http://www.acpgbi.org.uk/members /groups/nbocap/. Accessed December 7, 2016.
  2. Weiser TG, Haynes AB, Molina G, et al. Estimate of the global volume of surgery in 2012: an assessment supporting improved health outcomes. Lancet. 2015;385(suppl 2):S11.
  3. Greco M, Capretti G, Beretta L, Gemma M, Pecorelli N, Braga M. Enhanced recovery program in colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. World J Surg. 2014;38 (6):1531-1541.
  4. Gillissen F, Hoff C, Maessen JM, et al. Structured synchronous implementation of an enhanced recovery program in elective colonic surgery in 33 hospitals in the Netherlands. World J Surg. 2013;37 (5):1082-1093.
  5. Gillissen F, Ament SM, Maessen JM, et al. Sustainability of an enhanced recovery after surgery program (ERAS) in colonic surgery. World J Surg. 2015;39(2):526-533.
  6. Roulin D, Donadini A, Gander S, et al. Cost-effectiveness of the implementation of an enhanced recovery protocol for colorectal surgery. Br J Surg. 2013;100(8):1108-1114.
  7. Pearsall EA, Meghji Z, Pitzul KB, et al. A qualitative study to understand the barriers and enablers in implementing an enhanced recovery after surgery program. Ann Surg. 2015;261(1):92-96.
  8. Ament SM, Gillissen F, Moser A, et al. Identification of promising strategies to sustain improvements in hospital practice: a qualitative case study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14(1):641.
  9. Gustafsson UO, Scott MJ, Schwenk W, et al; Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society for Perioperative Care; European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN); International Association for Surgical Metabolism and Nutrition (IASMEN). Guidelines for perioperative care in elective colonic surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS(®) Society recommendations. World J Surg. 2013;37(2):259-284.
  10. Ljungqvist O. Jonathan E. Rhoads lecture 2011: insulin resistance and enhanced recovery after surgery.JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2012;36(4): 389-398.
  11. Bragg D, El-Sharkawy AM, Psaltis E, Maxwell-Armstrong CA, Lobo DN. Postoperative ileus: recent developments in pathophysiology and management. Clin Nutr. 2015;34(3):367-376.
  12. Gustafsson UO, Oppelstrup H, Thorell A, Nygren J, Ljungqvist O. Adherence to the ERAS-protocol is associated with 5-year survival after colorectal cancer surgery: a retrospective cohort study. World J Surg. 2016;40(7):1741-1747.
  13. Song W, Wang K, Zhang RJ, Dai QX, Zou SB. The Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) program in liver surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Springerplus. 2016;5: 207.
  14. Jeong O, Ryu SY, Park YK. Postoperative functional recovery after gastrectomy in patients undergoing Enhanced Recovery After Surgery: a prospective assessment using standard discharge criteria. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95(14):e3140.
  15. Porteous GH, Neal JM, Slee A, Schmidt H, Low DE. A standardized anesthetic and surgical clinical pathway for esophageal resection: impact on length of stay and major outcomes. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2015;40(2):139-149.
  16. Madani A, Fiore JF Jr, Wang Y, et al. An enhanced recovery pathway reduces duration of stay and complications after open pulmonary lobectomy. Surgery. 2015;158(4):899-910.
  17. Xu W, Daneshmand S, Bazargani ST, et al. Postoperative pain management after radical cystectomy: comparing traditional versus enhanced recovery protocol pathway.J Urol. 2015;194(5): 1209-1213.
  18. Nelson G, Kalogera E, Dowdy SC. Enhanced recovery pathways in gynecologic oncology. Gynecol Oncol. 2014;135(3):586-594.
  19. Stowers MD, Manuopangai L, Hill AG, Gray JR, Coleman B, Munro JT. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery in elective hip and knee arthroplasty reduces length of hospital stay. ANZ J Surg. 2016;86 (6):475-479.
  20. Jørgensen CC, Madsbad S, Kehlet H; Lundbeck Foundation Centre for Fast-track Hip and Knee Replacement Collaborative Group. Postoperative morbidity and mortality in type-2 diabetics after fast-track primary total hip and knee arthroplasty. Anesth Analg. 2015;120(1):230-238.
  21. Roulin D, Blanc C, Muradbegovic M, Hahnloser D, Demartines N, Hübner M. Enhanced recovery pathway for urgent colectomy. World J Surg. 2014;38(8):2153-2159.
  22. Nelson G, Kiyang LN, Crumley ET, et al. Implementation of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) across a provincial healthcare system: the ERAS Alberta colorectal surgery experience. World J Surg. 2016;40(5):1092-1103.
  23. Neville A, Lee L, Antonescu I, et al. Systematic review of outcomes used to evaluate enhanced recovery after surgery. Br J Surg. 2014;101(3):159-170.
Regular Issue Subscription Review Article
Volume 13
Issue 02
Received July 15, 2024
Accepted July 19, 2024
Published July 20, 2024
Views: 3